Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 558

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New-onset diabetes: a potential clue to the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer

Open access
Pannala, Rahul, Basu, Ananda, Petersen, Gloria M, Chari, Suresh T·2009·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

Summary Pancreatic cancer has a dismal prognosis as cancer-specific symptoms occur only at an advanced stage. If the cancer is to be discovered early, it will have to be done in asymptomatic individuals. Since the incidence of pancreatic cancer is low, screening for asymptomatic cancer in the general population will not be feasible. Screening will have to be restricted to subjects at high risk for pancreatic cancer. The proportion of pancreatic cancer patients who also have hyperglycemia or diabetes has previously been under appreciated; new data show that up to 80% are either hyperglycemic or diabetic and this can be evident in the pre-symptomatic phase. Diabetes improves following pancreatic cancer resection suggesting that diabetes is caused by the cancer. Conversely, older subjects with new-onset diabetes have an approximately 8 fold higher risk of having pancreatic cancer compared to the general population. Recognition of new-onset diabetes as an early manifestation of pancreatic cancer could lead to diagnosis of asymptomatic, early stage pancreatic cancer. However, primary type 2 diabetes is common and pancreatic cancer is relatively uncommon in the general population and the two forms of diabetes are clinically indistinguishable. The success of the strategy to use new-onset hyperglycemia and diabetes as a screening tool to identify subjects with a high likelihood of having asymptomatic pancreatic cancer will depend largely on our ability to differentiate pancreatic cancer-associated diabetes from the more common type 2 diabetes using a (serologic) biomarker.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(08)70337-1

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 558

Metadata

Authors
Pannala, R., Basu, A., Petersen, G. M., & Chari, S. T.
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
88-95
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155146717
Cited by
558
References
3
FWCI
7.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New-onset diabetes: a potential clue to the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(08)70337-1
The paper
Pannala, R., Basu, A., Petersen, G. M., & Chari, S. T. (2009). New-onset diabetes: a potential clue to the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(08)70337-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.