Effectiveness of a digital telemonitoring platform for cancer care of older patients: The ConnectElderlyPatientToDoctor study
Abstract
While telemedicine has been shown to improve the quality of care for cancer patients, it remains underused for older patients (OP), partly due to the assumption that OPs are unabled or unwilling to use digital tools. However, more than 50% of new cancers are diagnosed in people over 70. The ConnectElderlyPatientToDocto r study aimed to evaluate the OP compliance with the use of the digital telemonitoring platform Cureety in oncology. All cancer patients followed at the Military Hospital Bégin were eligible for the study. Patients were invited to respond to a symptomatology questionnaire personalized to their pathology and treatment. An algorithm evaluated the health status of the patient based on the reported adverse events. The population was divided into two groups, OP and younger patients (YP), based on a cut‐off at 70 years. The primary endpoint was to assess the compliance of OPs with the use of the digital oncology platform Cureety, compared to YP. From July 2020 to September 2021, a total of 117 patients were included in our study. We found that 66% of the patients were compliant, with no difference between the two groups (71.2% of YP, 61.7% of OP, P = .29). In OPs, progression free survival (PFS) ratio at 6‐months was 64.6% in the tolerant patients vs 23.4% in the nontolerant patients (HR = 0.1980, 95% CI = 0.04431‐0.8845, P = .0339). The median PFS was 23.3 months in the tolerant group vs 3.3 months in the nontolerant group (P = .0339). The data of overall survival are immature. OPs had a clear benefit from using this platform, similar to what was observed for YP. Patients felt less isolated and felt that they benefited from personalized care with early ambulatory medical care of adverse events. We also found that the health indicators collected with the platform in the first month of treatment are predictive of the progression of the disease. This solution makes it possible to streamline and improve the care pathway of OP.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Smaller, single-institution studies of RPM in routine care in France reported an overall 66%-72% adherence rate with weekly ePRO reporting.
“In addition, smaller, single-institution studies of RPM in routine care in France reported an overall 66%–72% adherence rate with weekly ePRO reporting.30,31”
From Implementation of a remote symptom monitoring pathway in oncology care: analysis of real-world experience across 33 cancer centres in France and Belgium (2024) · cites this paper as [30]
Cites
Basch, E., Deal, A. M., Dueck, A. C., Scher, H. I., Kris, M. G., Hudis, C., & Schrag, D. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.7156 · Cited by 2,302 · see citing works
Management of Cancer in the Older Person: A Practical Approach
Balducci, L., & Extermann, M. (2000) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.5-3-224 · Cited by 937 · see citing works
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events
National Cancer Institute (2020) · Definitions · doi:10.32388/erjxiq · Cited by 568 · see citing works
Remote patient monitoring: a comprehensive study
Malasinghe, L. P., Ramzan, N., & Dahal, K. (2019) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing · doi:10.1007/s12652-017-0598-x · Cited by 534 · see citing works
Denis, F., Lethrosne, C., Pourel, N., Molinier, O., Pointreau, Y., Domont, J., Bourgeois, H., Senellart, H., Trémolières, P., Lizée, T., et al. (2017) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djx029 · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Wu, Y., Yao, X., Vespasiani, G., Nicolucci, A., Dong, Y., Kwong, J., Li, L., Sun, X., Tian, H., & Li, S. (2017) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.6522 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
VA Telemedicine: An Analysis of Cost and Time Savings
Russo, J. E., McCool, R. R., & Davies, L. (2015) · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2015.0055 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Impact of telemonitoring at home on the management of elderly patients with congestive heart failure
Antonicelli, R., Testarmata, P., Spazzafumo, L., Gagliardi, C., Bilo, G., Valentini, M., Olivieri, F., & Parati, G. (2008) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1258/jtt.2008.071213 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Lesende, I. M., Orruño, E., Bilbao, A., Vergara, I., Rojas, M. C. C., Bayón, J. C., Reviriego, E., Romo, M. I. R., Larrañaga, J., Asua, J., et al. (2013) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-118 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Jonker, L. T., Plas, M., de Bock, G. H., Buskens, E., van Leeuwen, B. L., & Lahr, M. M. H. (2020) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-020-08705-1 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Jiang, C. Y., Strohbehn, G. W., Dedinsky, R., Raupp, S., Pannecouk, B., Yentz, S. E., & Ramnath, N. (2021) · JCO Oncology Practice · doi:10.1200/op.21.00317 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Pritchett, J. C., Borah, B. J., Desai, A. P., Xie, Z., Saliba, A. N., Leventakos, K., Coffey, J. D., Pearson, K. K., Speicher, L. L., Orenstein, R., et al. (2021) · JCO Oncology Practice · doi:10.1200/op.21.00307 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Jiang, X., Yao, J., & You, J. H. S. (2020) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/17846 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
The Use of Telemedicine in Cancer Clinical Trials: Connect-Patient-to-Doctor Prospective Study
Meghiref, Y., Parnot, C., Duverger, C., Difoum, F. L., Gourden, A., Yssaad, H., Leiterer, C., Bedekovic, C., Blanchard, J., Ammar, H. N., et al. (2021) · JMIR Cancer · doi:10.2196/31255 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationPourquoi et comment évaluer les sujets âgés atteints de cancer ?
Hélissey, C., Geiss, R., Baldini, C., et al. (2021) · Bulletin du Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bulcan.2021.01.011 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Franzoi, M. A., Ferreira, A. R., Lemaire, A., Rodriguez, J., Grosjean, J., Ribeiro, J. M., Polastro, L., Grellety, T., Artignan, X., Le Du, K., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Regional Health - Europe · doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101005 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Helissey, C., Parnot, C., Rivière, C., Duverger, C., Schernberg, A., Becherirat, S., Picchi, H., Le Roy, A., Vuagnat, P., Pristavu, R., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2023.1104700 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Rivière, C., Brureau, L., Parnot, C., Becherirat, S., Duverger, C., Picchi, H., Le Roy, A., Vuagnat, P., Schernberg, A., Vanquaethem, H., & Helissey, C.
- Affiliations
- Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Bégin (FR)
- Inserm (FR)
- Cureety Dinan France
- Department of Medical Oncology Military Hospital Begin Saint‐Mandé France
- Department of Internal Medicine Military Hospital Begin Saint‐Mandé France
- Clinical Research Unit Military Hospital Begin Saint‐Mandé France
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-07-09
- Volume
- 152
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 504-510
- ISSN
- 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0215
- OpenAlex
- W4283736134
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 1.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
- Keywords
- elderly cancer patients, telemedicine, medication adherence, adverse event reporting, symptom monitoring, progression-free survival, overall survival, individualized care, social isolation, outpatient care, military hospitals
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Neoplasms, Telemedicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review