Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 406

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 165 of the 165 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

FIGO recommendations on the management of postpartum hemorrhage 2022

Open access
Escobar, Maria Fernanda, Nassar, Anwar H., Theron, Gerhard, Barnea, Eythan R., Nicholson, Wanda, Ramasauskaite, Diana, Lloyd, Isabel, Chandraharan, Edwin, Miller, Suellen, Burke, Thomas, Ossanan, Gabriel, Andres Carvajal, Javier, Ramos, Isabella, Hincapie, Maria Antonia, Loaiza, Sara, Nasner, Daniela, FIGO Safe Motherhood and Newborn Health Committee·2022·International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Abstract

OBJETIVO E ESCOPO: O objetivo deste documento é atualizar conceitos-chave no tratamento da hemorragia pós-parto (HPP) e fornecer ferramentas claras e precisas ao pessoal de saúde em países de baixa e média renda (PRMB) para realizar tratamentos baseados em evidências, com o objectivo de reduzir a morbilidade e mortalidade materna relacionadas. PÚBLICO-ALVO: Ginecologistas, obstetras, parteiras, enfermeiras, clínicos gerais e demais profissionais de saúde responsáveis ​​pelo atendimento de gestantes com HPP. MÉTODOS: As recomendações foram desenvolvidas como uma síntese e atualização de evidências da literatura. Baseiam-se nas diretrizes do Comitê de Maternidade Segura e Saúde Neonatal da FIGO (SMNH), publicadas em 2021, e incluem pesquisas e diretrizes de consenso. Para o presente documento, foi realizada uma revisão bibliográfica e foram identificados estudos de países de baixa e média renda e de todas as regiões usando os motores de busca PubMed, Medline, Embase, Science Direct e Google Scholar. De acordo com a abordagem GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation), esta atualização não gera um nível universal de evidência. Contudo, cada seção e as conclusões e recomendações geradas utilizam os graus de evidência que foram identificados na revisão bibliográfica.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijgo.14116

Cites

165 of 165 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 165 references

Cited by

See all 406

Metadata

Authors
Escobar, M. F., Nassar, A. H., Theron, G., Barnea, E. R., Nicholson, W., Ramasauskaite, D., Lloyd, I., Chandraharan, E., Miller, S., Burke, T., Ossanan, G., Andres Carvajal, J., Ramos, I., Hincapie, M. A., Loaiza, S., Nasner, D., & FIGO Safe Motherhood and Newborn Health Committee
Venue
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-03
Volume
157
Issue
S1
Pages
3-50
ISSN
  • 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
  • 0020-7292
  • 1879-3479
OpenAlex
W4220758644
Cited by
406
References
165
FWCI
81.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FIGO recommendations on the management of postpartum hemorrhage 2022. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijgo.14116
The paper
Escobar, M. F., Nassar, A. H., Theron, G., Barnea, E. R., Nicholson, W., Ramasauskaite, D., Lloyd, I., Chandraharan, E., Miller, S., Burke, T., Ossanan, G., Andres Carvajal, J., Ramos, I., Hincapie, M. A., Loaiza, S., Nasner, D., & FIGO Safe Motherhood and Newborn Health Committee. (2022). FIGO recommendations on the management of postpartum hemorrhage 2022. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14116

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.