Cited by 34Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

The incidence of post‐traumatic stress disorder following traumatic childbirth: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Open access
Lai, Xiaolu, Chen, Jingfen, Li, Haiqi, Zhou, Lepeng, Huang, Qianyi, Liao, Yan, Krewski, Daniel, Wen, Shi Wu +2 more·2023·International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Abstract

Background: Although birth trauma may be a risk factor for postpartum post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), no systematic review regarding the incidence of postpartum PTSD in women with traumatic childbirth has been reported. Objective: To estimate the incidence of PTSD in women following traumatic childbirth by systematically reviewing and synthesizing all available evidence. Search Strategy: Six databases were searched using a combination of related terms for birth trauma and PTSD. Selection Criteria: Cohort and cross‐sectional studies that were related to traumatic childbirth and PTSD were included. Data Collection and Analysis: Two reviewers independently screened potentially relevant studies and extracted key data elements. A series of meta‐analyses were conducted using STATA 17.0 software, with pooled incidence rates estimated using random effects models. Main Results: A total of nine studies were included in this study. The pooled incidence of PTSD after traumatic childbirth was 19.4% (95% confidence interval 11.9%–26.5%). The incidence of PTSD varied with the scales used to assess traumatic birth and PTSD, evaluation times of PTSD after childbirth, and types of study participants. Conclusions: The incidence of PTSD in women with traumatic childbirth is about 19%, higher than the general obstetric population, suggesting that trauma‐related care for them should be enhanced.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijgo.14643

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lai, X., Chen, J., Li, H., Zhou, L., Huang, Q., Liao, Y., Krewski, D., Wen, S. W., Zhang, L., & Xie, R.
Affiliations
  • Southern Medical University (CN)
  • Hebei Medical University (CN)
  • Foshan Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital (CN)
  • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Xie, Ri‐Hua
Venue
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-01-19
Volume
162
Issue
1
Pages
211-221
ISSN
  • 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
  • 0020-7292
  • 1879-3479
OpenAlex
W4312195968
Cited by
34
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic birth, birth trauma, postpartum mental health, incidence, obstetric trauma, maternal mental health
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Incidence, Parturition, Postpartum Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review