Cited by 147Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Longitudinal trajectories of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after birth and associated risk factors

Dikmen-Yildiz, Pelin, Ayers, Susan, Phillips, Louise·2018·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Although longitudinal trajectories of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are well-established in general trauma populations, very little is known about the trajectories of birth-related PTSD. This study aimed to identify trajectories of birth-related PTSD; determine factors associated with each trajectory; and identify women more likely to develop birth-related PTSD.Method 226 women who had traumatic childbirth according to DSM-IV criterion A were drawn from a community sample of 950 women. Measures were taken of PTSD, affective symptoms, fear of childbirth and social support in pregnancy, 4-6 weeks and 6-months postpartum. Information on some obstetric and psychosocial factors were also prospectively obtained.Results Four trajectories were identified: resilience (61.9%), recovery (18.5%), chronic-PTSD (13.7%) and delayed-PTSD (5.8%). Resilience was consistently distinguished from other PTSD trajectories by less affective symptoms at 4-6 weeks postpartum. Poor satisfaction with health professionals was associated with chronic-PTSD and delayed-PTSD. When affective symptoms at 4-6 weeks postpartum were removed from the model, less social support and higher fear of childbirth 4-6 weeks after birth predicted chronic and recovery trajectories; whereas experience of further trauma and low levels of satisfaction with health professionals were predictive of chronic-PTSD and delayed-PTSD, compared to resilience. Additional variables associated with different trajectories included antenatal affective symptoms, caesarean-section, preterm birth and receiving professional help.Limitations Use of self-report measures, use of DSM-IV criteria for PTSD diagnosis, and no follow-up beyond six months are the main limitations of this study.Conclusion Identified factors may inform preventive and treatment interventions for women with traumatic birth experiences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2017.12.074

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Improving resilience has been shown to prevent the development and recurrence of depression and other adverse outcomes such as PTSD.

    “while improving resilience has shown to prevent the development and recurrence of depression and other adverse outcomes such as PTSD [12, 27].”

    From Effectiveness of a guided ACT-based self-help resilience training for depressive symptoms during pregnancy: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial embedded in a prospective cohort. (2020) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Results (section 2.4, page unavailable) compare observed resilient and non-resilient PTSD trajectories, and the Discussion (section 3, page unavailable) links postpartum affective symptoms with later PTSD. Neither reports that improving resilience prevents depression, its recurrence, or PTSD. Searches for resilience-improving interventions and prevention found no such finding in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dikmen-Yildiz, P., Ayers, S., & Phillips, L.
Affiliations
City, University of London (GB)
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
229
Pages
377-385
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2781643719
Cited by
146
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
12.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of National Education of the Republic of Turkey
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic birth, PTSD trajectories, resilience, chronic PTSD, postpartum period, affective symptoms, fear of childbirth, cesarean section, preterm birth, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Fear, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Pregnancy, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Social Support, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Parturition, Postpartum Period, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review