Cited by 53Sleep and related disordersCircadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Cross-cultural comparison of seven morningness and sleep-wake measures from Germany, India and Slovakia: MORNINGNESS IN GERMANY, SLOVAKIA AND INDIA

Randler, Christoph, Prokop, Pavol, Sahu, Subhashis, Haldar, Prasun·2015·International Journal of Psychology

Abstract

Morningness-eveningness or circadian typology can be viewed as an interesting aspect of individual differences. Morningness-eveningness is a preference for a given time of day for physical or mental performance, but also reflects aspects of affect. Here, we used seven different measures to assess differences in morningness-eveningness between Germany, Slovakia and India. The hypothesis was that Indians should be earliest chronotypes, followed by Slovakia and then Germany, because of higher temperatures in India, and the fact that Slovakia is located farther east compared to Germany. We applied the Composite Scale of Morningness (CSM), the Circadian Energy Scale (CIRENS), the CAEN Chronotype Questionnaire (CCQ), and habitual sleep-wake variables to calculate sleep duration, midpoint of sleep and social jetlag. Sample sizes were N = 300 (Germany), N = 482 (Slovakia) and N = 409 (India). Country had the strongest influence on morningness-eveningness. Germans were latest chronotypes and differed in all seven measures from Indians but differed from Slovakians only in the energy level at the evening and midpoint of sleep. Slovakians and Indians differed in all measures but the energy level (CIRENS). Women scored higher on the CSM, lower on CIRENS, lower on the morningness-eveningness (ME) scale, but higher on distinctness (DI) scale. Women slept longer and had an earlier midpoint of sleep.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijop.12098

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 53

Authors
Randler, C., Prokop, P., Sahu, S., & Haldar, P.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University of Education (DE)
  • University of Trnava (SK)
  • University of Kalyani (IN)
Corresponding author
Randler, Christoph
Venue
International Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-08-30
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
279-287
ISSN
0020-7594 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1934731779
Cited by
53
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
chronotype, cross-cultural comparison, sleep-wake behavior, social jetlag, sleep duration, circadian rhythm, gender differences, Composite Scale of Morningness, India, Germany, Slovakia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Circadian Rhythm, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Germany, Humans, India, Individuality, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Slovakia, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review