Cited by 25Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesYouth, Drugs, and ViolenceChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Acceptability and feasibility of a brief substance use intervention for adolescents in Cape Town, South Africa: A pilot study

Carney, Tara, Johnson, Kim, Carrico, Adam, Myers, Bronwyn·2020·International Journal of Psychology

Abstract

Substance use is prevalent among South African adolescents, but few interventions exist to reduce risk of harm. This study assesses the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effects of a brief intervention for reducing adolescent substance use and other risk behaviours. This single‐arm feasibility test recruited 30 substance‐using adolescents and their primary caregiver. Participants received separate interventions (2 sessions for adolescents, 1 session for caregivers), with a subsample randomly selected for post‐intervention interviews. Feasibility was measured by the proportion of eligible adolescents who were enrolled and retained in the study. Interviews explored acceptability, and changes in outcomes from baseline to 1‐month follow‐up assessed preliminary effects of the intervention. Thirty of 43 (69.8%) eligible adolescents and their caregivers were enrolled, with 29 adolescents (96.7%) and 28 caregivers (93.3%) completing the intervention. Twenty‐eight adolescents (93.3%) and 29 caregivers (96.7%) were retained at follow‐up. Frequency of alcohol, cannabis use and delinquent‐type behaviours decreased significantly from baseline to follow‐up. Participants appreciated the intervention content and delivery and felt that it facilitated behaviour change. Suggestions for improving the intervention were provided. This study found that the intervention is feasible, acceptable and had promising effects on adolescent behaviour. Efficacy must be established with a randomised controlled trial.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijop.12668

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Teen Intervene has been adapted and tested for use among adolescents in South Africa and found to be feasible and acceptable.

    “'Teen intervene' has been adapted and tested for use among adolescents in South Africa (Carney et al., 2019) and found to be feasible and acceptable (Carney et al., 2020).”
  • SBI has been found effective in reducing low, moderate, and high-risk substance use among youth in the US, Czech Republic, and South Africa.

    “It has been found to be effective in reducing low, moderate, and high-risk substance use among youth in the US (Winters et al., 2014), Czech Republic (Harris et al., 2012) and South Africa (Carney et al., 2020).”
  • In adolescents in South Africa, for those who reported current alcohol use, there was a significant reduction in self-reported frequency of alcohol use in the previous 30 days (t(14) = 2.3, p = .04, Cohen's d = 0.58) and in the number of drinks containing alcohol in one sitting (t(14) = 2.7, p = .02, Cohen's d = 0.69) from baseline to follow-up.

    “For those participants who reported current use of alcohol, there was a significant reduction in the self-reported fre-quency of alcohol use in the previous 30 days (t(14) = 2.3,p = .04, Cohen’s d = 0.58) and the number of drinks containing alcohol in one sitting (t(14) = 2.7, p = .02, Cohen’s d = 0.69) from baseline to the follow-upappointment.”
  • In adolescents in South Africa, there was a significant reduction in self-reported delinquent-type behaviors from baseline to follow-up (t(27) = 2.9, p < .01, Cohen's d = 0.55).

    “There was a significant reduction in self-reported delinquent-type behaviors from baseline to the follow-up appointment (t(27) = 2.9, p < .01, Cohen’s d = 0.55).”
  • In adolescents in South Africa, self-reported cannabis use frequency in the previous 30 days decreased significantly (t(19) = 2.1, p = .05, Cohen's d = 0.47), but changes in the proportion with positive biological results for cannabis did not reach statistical significance (X2(1) = 4.9, p = .06).

    “Self-reported cannabis use frequency in the previous 30 days also decreased significantly, (t(19) = 2.1, p = .05, Cohen’s d = 0.47), but changes inin the proportion of adolescents with positive biological results for cannabis did not reach statistical significance (X2(1) = 4.9, p = .06).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carney, T., Johnson, K., Carrico, A., & Myers, B.
Affiliations
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
  • University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Carney, Tara
Venue
International Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-04-13
Volume
55
Issue
6
Pages
1016-1025
ISSN
  • 0020-7594 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-066X
OpenAlex
W3015939315
Cited by
25
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation (CSUR160412161974‐105919)
  • South African Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Youth, Drugs, and Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
adolescent substance use, brief intervention, feasibility, acceptability, alcohol consumption, cannabis use, delinquency, risk-taking, caregiver involvement, intervention retention, behavior change, Cape Town
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Crisis Intervention, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, Risk-Taking, South Africa, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review