Cited by 2Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsProstate Cancer Treatment and Research

Editorial Comment to Combination therapy with radiation and hyperthermia‐induced clinical complete response of small cell carcinoma of prostate

Open access
Shoji, Sunao·2022·IJU Case Reports

Abstract

Small cell carcinoma of the prostate (SCCP) is usually treated with chemotherapy, such as cisplatin/etoposide, carboplatin/etoposide, docetaxel/carboplatin, and participation in clinical trials. However, it would be difficult to introduce chemotherapy in elderly patients and patients who have other diseases that affect chemotherapy, such as renal dysfunction and heart failure. The authors reported their experience on whole-pelvic radiation therapy with an additional dose administered to the prostate and concurrent 8-MHz radiofrequency capacitive regional hyperthermia for sensitizing the effect of radiation therapy for an 87-year-old man with SCCP.1 As other modalities of hyperthermia for prostate cancer, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has been used for whole-gland2 and focal therapies.3 HIFU is an extracorporeal ablative technology that delivers ultrasonic energy to pinpoint the foci only millimeters wide, and only minor temperature changes from 70 to 98.6°C are observed in the focal zone.3, 4 The 8-MHz radiofrequency capacitive regional hyperthermia warms the wide part sandwiched between electrodes to 42°C. Due to the present case having bladder invasion and right obturator lymph node metastasis of SCCP, radiofrequency hyperthermia was appropriately used due to the wide heat effect around the prostate. The safety of the surrounding large abdominal vessels during the radiofrequency hyperthermia5 encouraged the treatment for the lymph node near the large blood vessels. As a result, the authors encountered an effective case of SCCP treated with a combination of radiotherapy and hyperthermia therapy. For patients who have difficulty in receiving chemotherapy, the present treatment has the possibility to be the novel strategy for SCCP. I would like to pay tribute to the authors’ attitude toward patients and their challenging spirit. The author declares no conflict of interest.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/iju5.12417

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shoji, S.
Affiliations
Tokai University (JP)
Corresponding author
Shoji, Sunao
Venue
IJU Case Reports
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-01-18
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
116-117
ISSN
2577-171X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4205773868
Cited by
2
References
5
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IJU Case Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Keywords
whole pelvic radiotherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound, elderly patients, chemotherapy-ineligible patients, lymph node metastasis, bladder invasion, clinical complete response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review