A socioemotional intervention in a Latin American orphanage
Abstract
A pilot intervention that emphasized training and technical assistance to promote warm, sensitive, and responsive one‐on‐one caregiver–child interactions primarily during feeding and bathing/changing was implemented using regular staff in a depressed orphanage for children birth to approximately 8 years of age in Latin America. Despite a variety of unanticipated irregularities in the implementation of the intervention, many beyond the researchers' control, ward environments improved; caregivers displayed more warm, sensitive, and responsive interactions with children; and children improved an average of 13.5 developmental quotient (DQ) points after 4+ months' exposure to the completed intervention. Furthermore, 82% of the children had DQs greater than 70 before the intervention, but only 27.8% did so afterward. Although the training for all caregivers was aimed at children birth to 3 years, the number of different caregivers was reduced, and technical assistance was provided only to caregivers serving children less than 3 years, younger and older children (3–8 years) improved approximately the same amount. However, children who were transitioned from a younger to an older ward during the intervention improved less than did children who remained in either a younger or an older ward, the first evidence suggesting that the common orphanage practice of periodically graduating children from one homogeneous age group to another may impede their development. The study is consistent with others that have shown that orphanages can be changed, and increases primarily in warm, sensitive, responsive caregiver–child interactions can produce improvements in children's development.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only a few evaluations of program models for group care settings have reported intervention effects on the quality of relationships between children and staff.
“only a few evaluations of program models for group care settings have reported intervention effects on the quality of relationships between children and staff”
From Improving relationship quality in group care settings: The impact of implementing the CARE model (2020) · cites this paper as McCall et al., 2010
Most other empirically-supported models are based on studies at a single agency, making it difficult to know the extent to which findings were influenced by unique conditions at those locations.
“Most other empirically-supported models are based on studies at a single agency (Elwyn, Esaki, and Smith, 2015;Hodgdon et al., 2013;McCall et al., 2010;McCurdy & McIntyre, 2004;Morral, McCaffrey, & Ridgeway, 2004;Rivard, Bloom, McCorkle, & Abramovitz, 2005), making it difficult to know the extent to which findings were influenced by unique conditions at those locations.”
From Improving relationship quality in group care settings: The impact of implementing the CARE model (2020) · cites this paper as McCall et al., 2010
Cites
Cognitive Recovery in Socially Deprived Young Children: The Bucharest Early Intervention Project
Nelson, C. A., Zeanah, C. H., Fox, N. A., Marshall, P. J., Smyke, A. T., & Guthrie, D. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1143921 · Cited by 951 · see citing works
Rutter's Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
(2015) · doi:10.1002/9781118381953 · Cited by 639 · see citing works
A Neurobiological Perspective on Early Human Deprivation
Nelson, C. A. (2007) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2007.00004.x · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Petersburg, S. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9781444309683 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Taneja, V., Sriram, S., Beri, R. S., Sreenivas, V., Aggarwal, R., & Kaur, R. (2002) · Child: Care, Health and Development · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2214.2002.00246.x · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Improving relationship quality in group care settings: The impact of implementing the CARE model
Izzo, C. V., Smith, E. G., Sellers, D. E., Holden, M. J., & Nunno, M. A. (2020) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104623 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Predictors of Better Functioning among Institutionalized Youth: A Systematic Review
Wright, A. W., Richard, S., Sosnowski, D. W., & Kliewer, W. (2019) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-019-01527-0 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- McCall, R. B., Groark, C. J., Fish, L., Harkins, D., Serrano, G., & Gordon, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Corresponding author
- McCall, Robert B.
- Venue
- Infant Mental Health Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 521-542
- ISSN
- 0163-9641 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0355
- OpenAlex
- W2084756175
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 7.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Infant Mental Health Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
- Keywords
- orphanage care, caregiver-child interaction, caregiver education, responsive caregiving, child development, developmental quotient, technical assistance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review