Cited by 652Blockchain Technology Applications and SecuritySemantic Web and OntologiesFood Supply Chain Traceability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toward an ontology‐driven blockchain design for supply‐chain provenance

Kim, Henry M., Laskowski, Marek·2018·Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management

Abstract

Summary An interesting research problem in our age of Big Data is that of determining provenance. Granular evaluation of provenance of physical goods (e.g., tracking ingredients of a pharmaceutical or demonstrating authenticity of luxury goods) has often not been possible with today's items that are produced and transported in complex, interorganizational, often internationally spanning supply chains. Recent adoptions of the Internet of Things and blockchain technologies give promise at better supply‐chain provenance. We are particularly interested in the blockchain, as many favored use cases of blockchain are for provenance tracking. We are also interested in applying ontologies, as there has been some work done on knowledge provenance, traceability, and food provenance using ontologies. In this paper, we make a case for why ontologies can contribute to blockchain design. To support this case, we analyze a traceability ontology and translate some of its representations to smart contracts that execute a provenance trace and enforce traceability constraints on the Ethereum blockchain platform.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/isaf.1424

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 22 references

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Fox M. S., 1998, Enterprise modelling, AI Magazine, 19, 109
  2. The Economist Staff, 2015, The great chain of being sure about things, The Economist
  3. The Economist Staff, 2016, Not‐so‐clever contracts, The Economist

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 651

Metadata

Authors
Kim, H. M., & Laskowski, M.
Affiliations
York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Kim, Henry M.
Venue
Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
18-27
ISSN
  • 1055-615X (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-1949
  • 2160-0074
OpenAlex
W3123722958
Cited by
652
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 111 · 2019: 79 · 2018: 40
FWCI
133.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Intelligent systems in accounting, finance and management/Intelligent systems in accounting, finance & management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Supply Chain Traceability
Keywords
blockchain design, ontology (information science), smart contracts, Ethereum, provenance tracking, Internet of Things, knowledge provenance, food origin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review