Cited by 38Speech and dialogue systemsTopic ModelingAI in Service Interactions

An analysis of three chatbots: BlenderBot, ChatGPT and LaMDA

Open access
O'Leary, Daniel E.·2023·Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management

Abstract

Summary: Google, Facebook, OpenAI, and others have released access to versions of language chatbots that they have developed. These chatbots have been trained on massive amounts of text using neural networks for language processing. Using an approach similar to security penetration testing, this paper investigates and compares three different chatbots, assessing potential strengths and limitations of these systems. The paper presents several findings, including a comparison of those systems across answers to common questions, an analysis of the use of names and activities to guide discussion in two systems, an analysis of the extent of differences in responses arising from “regeneration” of a question, the determination of a weakness in a system of knowing “who” invented something, development of a potential new subfield, sensitive topic classifiers, and an analysis of some of the implications of these findings. As part of this analysis, I find emerging topics in chatbots, such as “topic stalemate” and the use of sensitive topic classifiers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/isaf.1531

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Leary, D. E.
Affiliations
University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
Venue
Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
41-54
ISSN
  • 1055-615X (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-1949
  • 2160-0074
OpenAlex
W4361858653
Cited by
38
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Intelligent systems in accounting, finance and management/Intelligent systems in accounting, finance & management (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
chatbots, ChatGPT, LaMDA, large language models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review