The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Development of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index
Abstract
The development of measures for assessing oral health status is essential to the evolution and maturation of a scientific knowledge base in geriatric dentistry. The literature suggests a high prevalence of dental diseases in older adults, yet valid and reliable instruments to assess the impact of oral diseases on older individuals or populations are lacking. This paper describes the rationale for and the development of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI), a self‐reported measure designed to assess the oral health problems of older adults. Following a review of the literature and consultation with health care providers and patients, a pilot instrument was developed. The GOHAI was initially tested on a convenience sample of 87 older adults. A revised instrument was then administered to a sample of 1755 Medicare recipients in Los Angeles County. The GOHAI demonstrated a high level of internal consistency and reliability as measured by a Cronbach's alpha of 0.79. Associations of the GOHAI with a single‐item rating of dental health and with clinical and sociodemographic supported the construct validity of the index. Having fewer teeth, wearing a removable denture and perceiving the need for dental treatment were significantly related to a worse (lower) GOHAI score. Respondents who were white, well educated, and with a higher annual household income were more likely to have a high GOHAI score, indicating fewer dental problems. Additional applications of the GOHAI are necessary to further evaluate the instrument's validity and reliability, and to establish population norms of oral health in older adult populations as measured by the GOHAI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Derivation and validation of a short‐form oral health impact profile
Slade, G. D. (1997) · Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00941.x · Cited by 2,746
Development, feasibility and performance of a health risk appraisal questionnaire for older persons
Stuck, A. E., Kharicha, K., Dapp, U., Anders, J., von Renteln-Kruse, W., Meier-Baumgartner, H. P., Harari, D., Swift, C. G., Ivanova, K., Egger, M., et al. (2007) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-7-1 · Cited by 324
Duong, H., Roccuzzo, A., Stähli, A., Salvi, G. E., Lang, N. P., & Sculean, A. (2022) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/prd.12419 · Cited by 283
Tonetti, M. S., Sanz, M., Avila‐Ortiz, G., Berglundh, T., Cairo, F., Derks, J., Figuero, E., Graziani, F., Guerra, F., Heitz‐Mayfield, L., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/jcpe.13808 · Cited by 107
Riordain, R. N., Glick, M., Mashhadani, S. S. A. A., Aravamudhan, K., Barrow, J., Cole, D., Crall, J. J., Gallagher, J. E., Gibson, J., Hegde, S., et al. (2021) · International Dental Journal · doi:10.1111/idj.12604 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Atchison, K., & Dolan, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Dental Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-11
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 680-687
- ISSN
- 0022-0337 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-7837
- OpenAlex
- W1932352339
- Cited by
- 1,197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.0022-0337.1990.54.11.tb02481.x
- The paper
- Atchison, K., & Dolan, T. (1990). Development of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index. Journal of Dental Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.1990.54.11.tb02481.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.