Cited by 94Dental Health and Care UtilizationDelphi Technique in ResearchHealth Education and Validation

Developing a standard set of patient-centred outcomes for adult oral health–an international, cross-disciplinary consensus

Open access
Riordain, Richeal Ni, Glick, Michael, Mashhadani, Shiamaa Shihab Ahmed Al, Aravamudhan, Krishna, Barrow, Jane, Cole, Deborah, Crall, James J., Gallagher, Jennifer E. +17 more·2021·International Dental Journal

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a minimum Adult Oral Health Standard Set (AOHSS) for use in clinical practice, research, advocacy and population health. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An international oral health working group (OHWG) was established, of patient advocates, researchers, clinicians and public health experts to develop an AOHSS. PubMed was searched for oral health clinical and patient-reported measures and case-mix variables related to caries and periodontal disease. The selected patient-reported outcome measures focused on general oral health, and oral health-related quality of life tools. A consensus was reached via Delphi with parallel consultation of subject matter content experts. Finally, comments and input were elicited from oral health stakeholders globally, including patients/consumers. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 1,453 results. After inclusion/exclusion criteria, 959 abstracts generated potential outcomes and case-mix variables. Delphi rounds resulted in a consensus-based selection of 80 individual items capturing 31 outcome and case-mix concepts. Global reviews generated 347 responses from 87 countries, and the patient/consumer validation survey elicited 129 responses. This AOHSS includes 25 items directed towards patients (including demographics, the impact of their oral health on oral function, a record of pain and oral hygiene practices, and financial implications of care) and items for clinicians to complete, including medical history, a record of caries and periodontal disease activity, and types of dental treatment delivered. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, utilising a robust methodology, a standardised core set of oral health outcome measures for adults, with a particular emphasis on caries and periodontal disease, was developed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/idj.12604

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The patient-reported outcome included within the COS was derived from the standardised core set of outcomes for adult oral health.

    “The patient-reported outcome included within the COS was derived from the standardised core set of outcomes for adult oral health.25”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence N Clinical Guideline (CG19): Dental checks: intervals between oral health reviews 2004 31869036

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Riordain, R. N., Glick, M., Mashhadani, S. S. A. A., Aravamudhan, K., Barrow, J., Cole, D., Crall, J. J., Gallagher, J. E., Gibson, J., Hegde, S., Kaberry, R., Kalenderian, E., Karki, A., Celeste, R. K., Listl, S., Myers, S. N., Niederman, R., Severin, T., Smith, M. W., Murray Thomson, W., Tsakos, G., Vujicic, M., Watt, R. G., Whittaker, S., & Williams, D. M.
Affiliations
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • American Dental Association (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Public Health Wales (GB)
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • New York University (US)
  • Hospitals Contribution Fund (Australia) (AU)
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of London (GB)
Venue
International Dental Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
40-52
ISSN
0020-6539 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3039394949
Cited by
94
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7
FWCI
11.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Dental Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Lenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • Harvard School of Dental Medicine
  • HCF Research Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
patient-centered outcomes, adult oral health, oral health-related quality of life, patient-reported outcome measures, dental caries, periodontal disease, oral hygiene habits, dental care costs, dental treatment, Delphi consensus, stakeholder validation
MeSH terms
Adult, Delphi Technique, Humans, Oral Health, Quality of Life, Reference Standards, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review