The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Repression of genes by DNA methylation depends on CpG density and promoter strength: evidence for involvement of a methyl‐CpG binding protein.
Open accessAbstract
Repression of transcription from densely methylated genes can be mediated by the methyl-CpG binding protein MeCP-1 (Boyes and Bird, 1991). Here we have investigated the effect of methylation on genes with a low density of methyl-CpG. We found that sparse methylation could repress transfected genes completely, but the inhibition was fully overcome by the presence in cis of an SV40 enhancer. Densely methylated genes, however, could not be reactivated by the enhancer. In vitro studies showed that the sparsely methylated genes bound weakly to MeCP-1 and that binding interfered with transcription. In the absence of available MeCP-1, methylation had minimal effects on transcription. From these and other results we propose that sparsely methylated genes form an unstable complex with MeCP-1 which prevents transcription when the promoter is weak. This complex can be disrupted by a strong promoter, thereby allowing the methylated gene to be transcribed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“DNA methylation (5-methylcytosine or 5mC) is associated with gene repression (16) and can disrupt the binding of many TFs (17, 18).”
From Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4‐Alpha Is Essential for the Active Epigenetic State at Enhancers in Mouse Liver (2019) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Our finding that targeted DNA methylation outside of annotated CGIs can lead to robust memorized gene silencing extends the canonical model of methylation-based gene silencing, which posits that a high density of CpG methylation is a requirement for stable propagation of silencing (Boyes and Bird, 1992).”
From Genome-wide programmable transcriptional memory by CRISPR-based epigenome editing (2021) · cites this paper as Boyes and Bird, 1992
Citations
Cites
CpG-rich islands and the function of DNA methylation
Bird, A. P. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/321209a0 · Cited by 3,777
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 387
Lopatina, N., Poole, J. C., Saldanha, S. N., Hansen, N. J., Key, J. S., Pita, M. A., Andrews, L. G., & Tollefsbol, T. O. (2003) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/s0006-291x(03)01033-7 · Cited by 82
Jane, S. M., Gumucio, D. L., Ney, P. A., Cunningham, J. M., & Nienhuis, A. W. (1993) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.13.6.3272 · Cited by 93
“The -y promoter is an archetype of a sparsely methylated promoter, containing only three CpG residues within the first 340 bp 5' to the cap site (3, 38).”
BackgroundTranscriptional repression by methylation of CpG
Meehan, R. R., Lewis, J., Cross, S. H., Nan, X., Jeppesen, P., & Bird, A. P. (1992) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.1992.supplement_16.2 · Cited by 90
“The three parameters which determine the effects of DNA methyl ation on gene expression are: (1) location of the methylated sites relative to the promoter; (2) density of methylated sites; (3) promoter strength (Boyes and Bird, 1992; Bird, 1992).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSingal, R., Ferris, R. C., Little, J. A., Wang, S. Z., & Ginder, G. D. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.25.13724 · Cited by 82
DNA methylation in osteoarthritic chondrocytes: a new molecular target.
Roach, H., & Aigner, T. (2007) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2006.07.002 · Cited by 92
GFP as a Genetic Marker Scorable Throughout the Life Cycle of Transgenic Zebra Fish
Gibbs, P. D., & Schmale, M. (2000) · Marine Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s101269900014 · Cited by 92
“…content has been associated with repression of transcription and implicated in silencing of transgenic expression (Jahner et al., 1982; Boyes and Bird, 1992); (3) lack of an intron, a component shown to increase expression levels in mouse cell culture (Buchman and Berg, 1988), transgenic mice…”
Forrester, W. C., Fernández, L. Á., & Grosschedl, R. (1999) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.13.22.3003 · Cited by 84
“Recently, a direct link between DNA methylation and inaccessible chromatin structure was provided by the finding that the methyl-CpG-binding protein-2 (MeCP2), which acts as a repressor when artificially tethered to a reporter gene, recruits the mSin3/histone deacetylase complex (Nan et al. 1997, 1998; Jones et al. 19…”
BackgroundInfluentialOxidative Stress and DNA Methylation Regulation in the Metabolic Syndrome
Yara, S., Lavoie, J., & Levy, E. H. (2015) · Epigenomics · doi:10.2217/epi.14.84 · Cited by 99
Epigenetic Regulation of Vascular Endothelial Gene Expression
Matouk, C. C., & Marsden, P. A. (2008) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.107.171025 · Cited by 232
Bhende, P. M., Seaman, W. T., Delecluse, H., & Kenney, S. C. (2005) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.79.12.7338-7348.2005 · Cited by 89
“It has been proposed that DNA methylation causes transcriptional repression by multiple different mechanisms, including modification of the histone acetylation state and prevention of transcription factor binding to DNA (5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 16, 26, 29, 31, 32, 35, 36, 40, 48, 49, 54).”
BackgroundMethylation-Dependent Binding of the Epstein-Barr Virus BZLF1 Protein to Viral Promoters
Dickerson, S., Xing, Y., Robinson, A. R., Seaman, W. T., Gruffat, H., & Kenney, S. C. (2009) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000356 · Cited by 88
Evolution of dioecy and sex chromosomes via methylation driving Muller's ratchet
Gorelick, R. (2003) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00244.x · Cited by 89
“In some but not all promoters, the degree of suppression of transcription is proportional to the density of cytosines that are methylated (Boyes & Bird, 1992; Tate & Bird, 1993).”
BackgroundEvidence for erosion of mouse CpG islands during mammalian evolution
Matsuo, K., Clay, O., Takahashi, T., Silke, J., & Schaffner, W. (1993) · Somatic Cell and Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf01233381 · Cited by 84
Newell-Price, J. (2003) · Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1677/joe.0.1770365 · Cited by 86
“The density of methylation is important since a weak promoter will be silenced by only a few methylated CpGs whilst a higher density of methylation is required to repress a strong promoter (Boyes & Bird 1992).”
Rideout, W. M., Eversole-Cire, P., Spruck, C., Hustad, C. M., Coetzee, G. A., Gonzales, F. A., & Jones, P. A. (1994) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.14.9.6143 · Cited by 75
“Bird and colleagues (2, 7, 29, 30) have shown that the methylation of CpG islands can repress transcription by an indirect mechanism involving the presumed participation of methylated DNA-binding proteins, which prevent transcription.”
BackgroundEpigenetic Mechanisms of Neurodegeneration in Huntington's Disease
Lee, J.-H., Hwang, Y. J., Kim, K. Y., Kowall, N. W., & Ryu, H. (2013) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1007/s13311-013-0206-5 · Cited by 90
“The recognition sequence for the mammalian DNMT is relatively conserved, with nearly all cytosine methylation occurring on 5-C-p-G-3 (CpG) [33, 35, 36].”
Evidence for local control of gene expression in the epidermal differentiation complex
Elder, J. T., & Zhao, X. (2002) · Experimental Dermatology · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0625.2002.110503.x · Cited by 81
“As many studies have found a strong correlation between CpG methylation and ‘closed’ chromatin (31), this result indicates that chromatin structural alterations also participate in the control of genes located in the EDC.”
BackgroundBaumann, M., Pontiller, J., & Ernst, W. (2010) · Molecular Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s12033-010-9265-6 · Cited by 75
Paulson, E. J., & Speck, S. H. (1999) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.73.12.9959-9968.1999 · Cited by 75
“In vitro methylation studies have shown that as little as 7% methylation of a reporter construct can lead to a 60 to 90% reduction in transcription, and higher levels of methylation almost completely abolish transcription, even in the presence of a strong transcriptional enhancer (8, 22, 32).”
BackgroundTao, Q., Robertson, K. D., Manns, A., Hildesheim, A., & Ambinder, R. F. (1998) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.72.9.7075-7083.1998 · Cited by 79
“Moreover, methylation-specific transcription repressors such as MeCP1 and MeCP2 may compete with transcription factors for binding sites and result in transcriptional repression (6, 7).”
BackgroundMagdinier, F., Billard, L.-M., Wittmann, G., Frappart, L., Benchaïb, M., Lenoir, G., Guérin, J.-F., & Dante, R. (2000) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.99-0817com · Cited by 90
“Transient transfection of fusion proteins have identified a MeCP2 domain that is capable of longrange repression of vectors (19, 24).”
BackgroundMacleod, D., Ali, R. R., & Bird, A. P. (1998) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.18.8.4433 · Cited by 66
Self-citationMizumoto, Y., Kimura, T., & Ivell, R. (1997) · Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s0303-7207(97)00195-0 · Cited by 79
Jhaveri, M. S., & Morrow, C. S. (1998) · Gene · doi:10.1016/s0378-1119(98)00021-3 · Cited by 76
Gopisetty, G., Xu, J., Sampath, D., Colman, H., & Puduvalli, V. K. (2012) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2012.331 · Cited by 77
Mammalian X-chromosome inactivation and the XIST gene.
Ballabio, A., & Willard, H. (1992) · Current Opinion in Genetics and Development · doi:10.1016/s0959-437x(05)80155-8 · Cited by 78
Yuan, X.-M., Tsujimoto, K., Hashimoto, K., Kawahori, K., Hanzawa, N., Hamaguchi, M., Seki, T., Nawa, M., Ehara, T., Kitamura, Y., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03038-w · Cited by 77
Ramachandran, K., Gopisetty, G., Gordián, E. R., Navarro, L., Hader, C., Reis, I., Schulz, W., & Singal, R. (2009) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-3609 · Cited by 77
“Similar results were obtained when the human a-globin promoter with dense CpG clusters was methylated to a lower density (35).”
ResultThe DNA methylation machinery as a target for anticancer therapy
Szyf, M. (1996) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/0163-7258(96)00002-2 · Cited by 84
X chromosome inactivation and DNA methylation
Singer–Sam, J., & Riggs, A. D. (1993) · Birkhäuser Basel eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-9118-9_16 · Cited by 79
Thakur, A., Wong, J. C. H., Wang, E. Y., Lotto, J., Kim, D., Cheng, J., Mingay, M., Cullum, R., Moudgil, V., Ahmed, N., et al. (2019) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.30631 · Cited by 68
“DNA methylation (5-methylcytosine; 5mC) is associated with gene repression(16) and can disrupt the binding of many TFs.”
BackgroundDNA methylation and polyamines in embryonic development and cancer.
Heby, O. (1995) · International Journal of Developmental Biology · doi:10.1387/ijdb.8645558 · Cited by 75
Links between DNA methylation and nucleosome occupancy in the human genome
Collings, C. K., & Anderson, J. N. (2017) · Epigenetics & Chromatin · doi:10.1186/s13072-017-0125-5 · Cited by 77
“One possible answer could be derived from the influential silencing mechanisms of methyl-binding proteins [65, 66].”
Epigenetic Gene Inactivation Induced by a Cis-acting Methylation Center (*)
Mummaneni, P., Walker, K., Bishop, P. L., & Turker, M. (1995) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.270.2.788 · Cited by 74
DNA repeats in the human genome
Catasti, P., Chen, X., Mariappan, S. V. S., Bradbury, E. M., & Gupta, G. (1999) · Genetica · doi:10.1023/a:1003716509180 · Cited by 79
“methyl-CpG-binding proteins [36–40] leading to the suppression of the FMR-1 gene.”
BackgroundEpigenetics by DNA methylation for development of normal and cloned animals.
Shiota, K., & Yanagimachi, R. (2002) · Differentiation; research in biological diversity · doi:10.1046/j.1432-0436.2002.690406.x · Cited by 74
Potential link between estrogen receptor-alpha gene hypomethylation and uterine fibroid formation.
Asada, H., Yamagata, Y., Taketani, T., Matsuoka, A., Tamura, H., Hattori, N., Ohgane, J., Hattori, N., Shiota, K., & Sugino, N. (2008) · Molecular human reproduction · doi:10.1093/molehr/gan045 · Cited by 73
pEPito: a significantly improved non-viral episomal expression vector for mammalian cells
Haase, R., Argyros, O., Wong, S., Harbottle, R. P., Lipps, H. J., Ogris, M., Magnusson, T., Vizoso-Pinto, M. G., Haas, J., & Baiker, A. E. (2010) · BMC Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/1472-6750-10-20 · Cited by 79
“The majority of human promoters belong to the highCpG class of promoters, for which it is well established that the methylation status of the surrounding CpG islands has a direct influence on the promoter activity unmethylated CpG islands in the promoter region correspond to active promoters, whereas heavily methylate…”
BackgroundDNA Methylation and Cancer Therapy
Szyf, M. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/b139080 · Cited by 69
Trasler, J., Deng, L.-Y., Melnyk, S., Pogribny, I., Hiou-Tim, F., Sibani, S., Oakes, C., Li, E., James, S., & Rozen, R. (2003) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/24.1.39 · Cited by 72
Yin, H., & Blanchard, K. (2000) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v95.1.111.001k20_111_119 · Cited by 71
Hong, K., Sherley, J., & Lauffenburger, D. (2001) · Biomolecular Engineering · doi:10.1016/s1389-0344(01)00100-9 · Cited by 70
Ramirez, M. I., Rishi, A., Cao, Y.-X., & Williams, M. C. (1997) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.272.42.26285 · Cited by 70
Yan, P. S., Efferth, T., Chen, H., Lin, J. J., Rödel, F., FÜZESI, L., & Huang, T. H. ‐. (2002) · Methods · doi:10.1016/s1046-2023(02)00070-1 · Cited by 59
Hu, C.-J., Chen, S.-D., Yang, D.-I., Lin, T.-N., Chen, C.-M., Huang, T., & Hsu, C.-Y. (2006) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600304 · Cited by 66
“…direct interactions between methyl group tags and transcription factors or other regulatory proteins (e.g., methylcytosine binding proteins (MeCPs)), steric hindrance of protein– DNA interactions or alteration of the nucleosome and chromatin structure (Boyes and Bird, 1992; Pennings et al, 2005).”
BackgroundMolecular-clinical spectrum of the ATR-X syndrome
Gibbons, R. J., & Higgs, D. R. (2000) · American Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1002/1096-8628(200023)97:3 · Cited by 240
Wang, Y. H., & Griffith, J. D. (1996) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.271.38.22937 · Cited by 64
Kuramasu, A., Saito, H., Suzuki, S., Watanabe, T., & Ohtsu, H. (1998) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.273.47.31607 · Cited by 67
Salomon, B. L., Maury, S., Loubiere, L., Caruso, M., Onclercq, R., & Klatzmann, D. (1995) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.15.10.5322 · Cited by 64
“(i) The TK gene is a GC-rich gene (65% GC and 15% CpG dinucleotide sites); thus, its expression may be methylation dependent (7).”
BackgroundRay, J. S., Harbison, M., Mcclain, R., & Goodman, J. (1994) · Molecular Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1002/mc.2940090307 · Cited by 64
Yang, H.-P., Huang, Z.-Z., Zeng, Z., Chen, C.-J., Selby, R. R., & Lu, S. C. (2001) · American Journal of Physiology - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpgi.2001.280.2.g184 · Cited by 63
“Recently, the mechanism of methylation-dependent gene silencing has been shown to involve binding of histone deacetylase and methylcytosine-binding protein such as MeCP2, which appear to be essential for the assembly of the methylated sequences into a condensed state (2, 16).”
BackgroundStudies of DNA methylation in animals
Bird, A. P., Tate, P. H., Nan, X., Campoy, J., Meehan, R. R., Cross, S. H., Tweedie, S., Charlton, J., & Macleod, D. (1995) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.1995.supplement_19.5 · Cited by 66
Self-citationDNA methylation dynamics in muscle development and disease
Carrió, E. (2015) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2015.00019 · Cited by 67
“In addition, DNA methylation has an important role in gene regulation that depends on the genomic CpG context: promoter methylation is associated with gene silencing (Boyes and Bird, 1992; Hsieh, 1994), gene body methylation has variable effects on gene transcription (Gelfman et al.”
BackgroundDNA Methylation Regulates Placental Lactogen I Gene Expression
Cho, J.-H., Kimura, H., Minami, T., Ohgane, J., Hattori, N., Tanaka, S., & Shiota, K. (2001) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/en.142.8.3389 · Cited by 62
“To date, most data on methylation-mediated gene repression concern TATA-less and GC-rich promoters that are associated with the CpG islands (48, 49).”
BackgroundZardo, G., & Caiafa, P. (1998) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.273.26.16517 · Cited by 62
Acetylation and MAPK phosphorylation cooperate to regulate the degradation of active GATA-1.
Hernández-Hernández, Á., Ray, P., Litos, G., Ciró, M., Ottolenghi, S., Beug, H., & Boyes, J. (2007) · EMBO Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bcmd.2006.10.021 · Cited by 61
“RNase protection, S1 mapping and luciferase assay The RNase protection assay was as described (Boyes and Bird, 1992); S1 mapping and probes are as described (Cairns et al, 2003).”
MethodSelf-citationDNA methylation: regulation of gene expression and role in the immune system
Mostoslavsky, R., & Bergman, Y. (1997) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0304-419x(97)00010-3 · Cited by 48
Chan, Q. K. Y., Khoo, U., Chan, K. Y. K., Ngan, H., Li, S., Chiu, P. M., Man, L.-S., Ip, P. P. C., Xue, W., & Cheung, A. (2005) · Journal of Molecular Diagnostics · doi:10.1016/s1525-1578(10)60003-7 · Cited by 53
Rapid analysis of CpG methylation patterns using RNase T1 cleavage and MALDI-TOF.
Schatz, P., Dietrich, D., & Schuster, M. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gnh165 · Cited by 59
“by interfering with the binding of transcription factors (1) and is involved in fundamental processes like X-chromosome inactivation (2), imprinting (3), tumorigenesis (4), aging and cell differentiation (5).”
BackgroundRegulation of myogenic gene expression
Vicente‐García, C., Hernández‐Camacho, J. D., & Carvajal, J. J. (2022) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2022.113299 · Cited by 65
“Indeed, intra-genic methylation is generally associated with alternative splicing regulation [17,26], alternative promoter usage [18,27] and activation of gene expression [28], while intergenic methylation on promoters and enhancers is involved in silencing [23,28,29].”
BackgroundThe Molecular Mechanism of Induced Pluripotency: A Two-Stage Switch
Scheper, W., & Copray, S. C. V. M. (2009) · Stem Cell Reviews and Reports · doi:10.1007/s12015-009-9077-x · Cited by 60
“However, the relevance of these small differences to stem cell identity is debatable, as it is has been shown that it is not the exact DNA methylation pattern that determines gene activity, but rather the overall density of methylation marks [152, 153].”
BackgroundKovařík, A., van Houdt, H., Holý, A., & Depicker, A. (2000) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(00)01077-2 · Cited by 57
Ngô, V., Gourdji, D., & Laverrière, J. (1996) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.16.7.3245 · Cited by 57
“Therefore, it is not at all self-evident that the mechanisms whereby DNA methylation operates on such genes are similar to those preventing transcription of genes with GC-rich and TATA-less promoters (5).”
BackgroundAnticancer Natural Compounds as Epigenetic Modulators of Gene Expression
Ratovitski, E. A. (2017) · Current Genomics · doi:10.2174/1389202917666160803165229 · Cited by 66
“In addition to regulation of gene expression by DNA methylation, MBD proteins can bind to the methylated cytosine [198, 245-249].”
BackgroundMagnusson, T., Haase, R., Schleef, M., Wagner, E., & Ogris, M. (2011) · Journal of Gene Medicine · doi:10.1002/jgm.1585 · Cited by 56
“Apparently, in both cases, this reduction appears to be a result of the well reported fast CMV-promoter inactivation by methylation [1,49].”
BackgroundMichelotti, G., Brinkley, D., Morris, D. P., Smith, M. P., Louie, R. J., & Schwinn, D. (2007) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.06-7118com · Cited by 56
Hordein promoter methylation and transcriptional activity in wild-type and mutant barley endosperm
Sørensen, M. B., Müller, M., Skerritt, J. H., & Simpson, D. J. W. (1996) · Molecular and General Genetics MGG · doi:10.1007/bf02172987 · Cited by 74
“There is strong evidence that MeCP-1 participates in transcriptional inactivation (Boyes and Bird 1991), and that the degree of inhibition depends on the density of methylated CpGs in the promoter (Boyes and Bird 1992).”
BackgroundInheritance of chromatin states.
Wolffe, A. (1994) · Developmental Genetics · doi:10.1002/dvg.1020150604 · Cited by 56
Parental Chromosome-specific Chromatin Conformation in the Imprinted U2af1-rs1 Gene in the Mouse
Feil, R., Boyano, M. D., Allen, N. D., & Kelsey, G. (1997) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.272.33.20893 · Cited by 50
Eukaryotic DNA methyltransferases – structure and function
Adams, R. L. P. (1995) · Bioessays · doi:10.1002/bies.950170209 · Cited by 55
Arabidopsis histone deacetylase 6: a green link to RNA silencing
Aufsatz, W., Stoiber, T., Rakic, B., & Naumann, K. (2007) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1210615 · Cited by 49
“However, in vivo, the strength of MBDmediated repression likely depends on a delicate balance between CpG methylation density and promoter strength, with a high density of CpG methylation correlating with strong and stable repression (Boyes and Bird, 1992).”
BackgroundJanssen, J., Imoto, I., Inoue, J., Shimada, Y., Ueda, M., Imamura, M., Bartram, C., & Inazawa, J. (2002) · Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s100380200065 · Cited by 53
“DNA methylation is thought to play a key role in the regulation of gene expression, and various genes show an inverse relationship between DNA methylation and transcription in both normal and malignant cells (Boyes and Bird 1992; Ponder 2001; Baylin et al. 2001).”
BackgroundDNMT1: catalytic and non-catalytic roles in different biological processes.
Mohan, K. N. (2022) · Epigenomics · doi:10.2217/epi-2022-0035 · Cited by 52
Overexpression of DNA methyltransferase in myoblast cells accelerates myotube formation.
Takagi, H., Tajima, S., & Asano, A. (1995) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.0282e.x · Cited by 52
Karam, J. A., Fan, J.-H., Stanfield, J., Richer, E., Benaim, E., Frenkel, E., Antich, P., Sagalowsky, A., Mason, R. P., & Hsieh, J.-T. (2007) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.22405 · Cited by 51
“Although, hypermethylation of CpG islands is also found in the 30 end of some genes, the density of DNA methylation in promoter or first exon regions correlates inversely with the level of gene transcription.(34) DNA hypermethylation, particularly in the GC-rich promoter region, results in transcription repression tha…”
BackgroundManton, K., Douglas, M., Netzel-Arnett, S., Fitzpatrick, D., Nicol, D., Boyd, A., Clements, J., & Antalis, T. (2005) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602373 · Cited by 51
“Mechanisms of silencing of gene transcription by DNA methylation occur either through methylation of specific CpG dinucleotides contained within the binding sites for transcription factors (Tate and Bird, 1993) or through methylation of a region of CpG dinucleotides resulting in binding of methyl CpG proteins to the D…”
BackgroundNon-viral therapeutic approaches to ocular diseases: An overview and future directions
Zulliger, R., Conley, S. M., & Naash, M. I. (2015) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.10.007 · Cited by 50
Acetylation and MAPK phosphorylation cooperate to regulate the degradation of active GATA‐1
Hernández‐Hernández, Á., Ray, P., Litos, G., Cirò, M., Ottolenghi, S., Beug, H., & Boyes, J. (2006) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601228 · Cited by 106
“…1 h at room temperature except anti-ubiquitin and anti-acetyl-GATA-1 antibodies, which were incubated overnight at 41C. RNase protection, S1 mapping and luciferase assay The RNase protection assay was as described (Boyes and Bird, 1992); S1 mapping and probes are as described (Cairns et al, 2003).”
MethodSelf-citationPark, J.-G., & Chapman, V. M. (1994) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.14.12.7975-7983.1994 · Cited by 43
“Recent studies have shown that the methyl-CpGbinding protein (MeCP-1) (30) is an indirect inhibitor of transcription from many methylated promoters, including the PGKJ promoter (8, 9).”
BackgroundDNA hypomethylation and activation of germline-specific genes in cancer.
Smet, C. D., & Loriot, A. (2013) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9967-2_7 · Cited by 50
Jung, B., Zhang, G., Ho, W., Francis, J., & Eubanks, J. H. (2002) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(02)00383-4 · Cited by 49
Yew, N., & Cheng, S. H. (2004) · Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery · doi:10.1517/17425247.1.1.115 · Cited by 48
“(2004) 1(1) An additional major limitation of globally methylating the plasmid is that it inhibits the transcriptional activity of most promoters [61].”
BackgroundExpression of Tumor Suppressor Gene p16INK4 Products in Primary Gastric Cancer
Tsujie, M., Yamamoto, H., Tomita, N., Sugita, Y., Ohue, M., Sakita, I., Tamaki, Y., Sekimoto, M., Doki, Y., Inoue, M., et al. (2000) · Oncology · doi:10.1159/000012089 · Cited by 48
Binding of Histone H1 to DNA Is Indifferent to Methylation at CpG Sequences
Campoy, F. J., Meehan, R. R., McKay, S. J., Nixon, J. E. J., & Bird, A. P. (1995) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.270.44.26473 · Cited by 45
Self-citationDNA Methylation Represses the Murine αl (I) Collagen Promoter by an Indirect Mechanism
Rhodes, K., Rippe, R. A., Umezawa, A., Nehls, M. C., Brenner, D. A., & Breindl, M. (1994) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.14.9.5950-5960.1994 · Cited by 9
“It has been suggested that a combination of three different parameters determines the effect of DNA methylation on gene expression: the strength of a promoter, the CpG density, and the location of methylated sites relative to the promoter (9, 43, 50).”
BackgroundMethodNightingale, K. P., & Wolffe, A. P. (1995) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.270.9.4197 · Cited by 47
Li, J., Braganza, A., & Sobol, R. W. (2013) · Antioxidants and Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2012.5107 · Cited by 50
“Methylation of cytosine to 5mC at the CpG sites is an important step in epigenetic transcriptional regulation related to transcriptional repression, X-chromosome inactivation, imprinting, and suppression of parasitic sequences (13,60,83).”
Noninfectious Gene Transfer and Expression Systems for Cancer Gene Therapy
Cooper, M. J. (2002) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012437551-2/50003-3 · Cited by 48
Methylation status of immunoglobulin x e segments correlates with their recombination potential
Goodhardt, M., Cavelier, P., Doyen, N., Kallenbach, S., Babinet, C., & Rougeon, F. (1993) · European Journal of Immunology · doi:10.1002/eji.1830230809 · Cited by 46
Ford, E., Grimmer, M. R., Stolzenburg, S., Bogdanovic, O., Mendoza, A. D., Farnham, P. J., Blancafort, P., & Lister, R. (2017) · doi:10.1101/170506 · Cited by 45
DNA Methylation Editing by CRISPR-guided Excision of 5-Methylcytosine
Devesa-Guerra, I., Morales‐Ruíz, T., Pérez-Roldán, J., Parrilla-Doblas, J. T., León, M. D., García‐Ortiz, M. V., Ariza, R. R., & Roldán‐Arjona, T. (2020) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2020.02.007 · Cited by 51
Graessmann, A., Sandberg, G., Guhl, E., & Graessmann, M. (1994) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.14.3.2004 · Cited by 40
“There is experimental evidence that DNA methylation per se does not block the RNA polymerase but that inhibition requires a further interplay of additional cellular proteins (6, 7, 21, 23, 24).”
BackgroundRobakis, T. K., Zhang, S., Rasgon, N., Li, T., Wang, T., Roth, M. C., Humphreys, K., Gotlib, I., Ho, M., Khechaduri, A., et al. (2020) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-020-0703-3 · Cited by 44
Methionine Adenosyltransferase ( S ‐Adenosylmethionine Synthetase)
Pajares, M. A., & Markham, G. D. (2011) · Advances in enzymology and related areas of molecular biology/Advances in enzymology and related subjects · doi:10.1002/9781118105771.ch11 · Cited by 44
Raver, R. M., Panfil, A. R., Hagemeier, S. R., & Kenney, S. (2013) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.00546-13 · Cited by 43
Liu, H.-W., Lin, H.-L., Yen, J., Tsai, W.-C., Chiou, S., Chang, J.-G., Ou, T.-T., Wu, C.-C., & Chao, N. (2014) · Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2014.05.002 · Cited by 42
Nagji, A. S., Liu, Y., Stelow, E., Stukenborg, G. J., & Jones, D. R. (2010) · Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.2707 · Cited by 42
“Recently, methylation-specific gene expression arrays or ‘methylomes’ have shown that CGI methylation can localize to genomic regions distal to the promoters [26], although the majority of evidence supports that it is methylation of the promoter-associated CGI that directly affects gene transcription [18,27,28].”
BackgroundOrigin and maintenance of sex: the evolutionary joys of self sex
Gorelick, R., & Carpinone, J. (2009) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01334.x · Cited by 59
“In both eukaryotes and prokaryotes, cytosine methylation is involved with silencing regulatory genes (Boyes & Bird, 1992; Noyer-Weidner & Trautner, 1993).”
BackgroundMethylation and expression of p16INK4 tumor suppressor gene in primary colorectal cancer tissues.
Kim, B., Yamamoto, H., Ikeda, K., Damdinsuren, B., Sugita, Y., Ngan, C., Fujie, Y., Ogawa, M., Hata, T., Ikeda, M., et al. (2005) · International Journal of Oncology · doi:10.3892/ijo.26.5.1217 · Cited by 42
DNA methylation regulated microRNAs in human cervical cancer
Varghese, V. K., Shukla, V., Kabekkodu, S. P., Pandey, D., & Satyamoorthy, K. (2018) · Molecular Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1002/mc.22761 · Cited by 41
“may contribute to greater repression as per the hypothesis established earlier.(48) ThemiR-200b has 28CpG siteswith the region of 364 bp and showed highest density of methylation in the CpG sites 8-17 and 1925.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Boyes, J., & Bird, A.
- Affiliations
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (AT)
- Venue
- The EMBO Journal
- Published
- 1992-01-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 327-333
- ISSN
- 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2075
- PMC
- PMC556453
- OpenAlex
- W1821654469
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 9.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
- Keywords
- DNA methylation, transcriptional repression, CpG density, promoter strength, methyl-CpG binding proteins, SV40 enhancer, gene reactivation, transcriptional silencing
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Binding Sites, DNA-Binding Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Globins, Methylation, Models, Genetic, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Simian virus 40, Transcription, Genetic, Transfection, DNA Modification Methylases, DNA-Cytosine Methylases, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review