The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Repression of genes by DNA methylation depends on CpG density and promoter strength: evidence for involvement of a methyl‐CpG binding protein.
Open accessAbstract
Repression of transcription from densely methylated genes can be mediated by the methyl-CpG binding protein MeCP-1 (Boyes and Bird, 1991). Here we have investigated the effect of methylation on genes with a low density of methyl-CpG. We found that sparse methylation could repress transfected genes completely, but the inhibition was fully overcome by the presence in cis of an SV40 enhancer. Densely methylated genes, however, could not be reactivated by the enhancer. In vitro studies showed that the sparsely methylated genes bound weakly to MeCP-1 and that binding interfered with transcription. In the absence of available MeCP-1, methylation had minimal effects on transcription. From these and other results we propose that sparsely methylated genes form an unstable complex with MeCP-1 which prevents transcription when the promoter is weak. This complex can be disrupted by a strong promoter, thereby allowing the methylated gene to be transcribed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“DNA methylation (5-methylcytosine or 5mC) is associated with gene repression (16) and can disrupt the binding of many TFs (17, 18).”
From Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4‐Alpha Is Essential for the Active Epigenetic State at Enhancers in Mouse Liver (2019) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Our finding that targeted DNA methylation outside of annotated CGIs can lead to robust memorized gene silencing extends the canonical model of methylation-based gene silencing, which posits that a high density of CpG methylation is a requirement for stable propagation of silencing (Boyes and Bird, 1992).”
From Genome-wide programmable transcriptional memory by CRISPR-based epigenome editing (2021) · cites this paper as Boyes and Bird, 1992
Citations
Cites
CpG-rich islands and the function of DNA methylation
Bird, A. P. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/321209a0 · Cited by 3,777
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–387 of 387
Luo, J.-F., Yao, Y.-D., Cheng, C., Lio, C., Liu, J.-X., Huang, Y.-F., He, F., Xie, Y., Liu, L., Liu, Z.-Q., et al. (2022) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. Gene Regulatory Mechanisms · doi:10.1016/j.bbagrm.2022.194813 · Cited by 10
Xiang, D., Sun, S., Wang, G., & Liu, Z. (2021) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2021.644663 · Cited by 14
“Previous data indicate that an increase in DNA methylation at specific genomic sites may reduce gene expression (Boyes and Bird, 1992).”
BackgroundDNA Methylation Inhibits the Expression of CFSH in Mud Crab
Jiang, Q., Lin, D., Huang, H., Wang, G., & Ye, H. (2020) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2020.00163 · Cited by 15
“It has been reported that the effect of methylation on gene expression depended on several parameters, including the location of CpG dinucleotide relative to the promoter (47), the local density of methylated CpG dinucleotide (48), the strength of the promoter (48), and the dependence of promoter function on transcrip…”
BackgroundIkawa, Y., Sugimoto, N., Koizumi, S., Yachie, A., & Saikawa, Y. (2010) · Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology · doi:10.1097/mph.0b013e3181c29c3c · Cited by 10
Allelic methylation bias of the RARB2 tumor suppressor gene promoter in cancer
Pappas, J. J., Toulouse, A., Hébert, J., Fetni, R., & Bradley, W. (2008) · Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer · doi:10.1002/gcc.20603 · Cited by 10
“In all these lines, the level of methylation in the hypomethylated allele was unlikely sufficient to be responsible for inactivation (Boyes and Bird, 1992).”
BackgroundGorelick, R., & Bertram, S. (2003) · Theory in biosciences · doi:10.1007/s12064-003-0061-8 · Cited by 10
Brodzik, R., & Hennig, J. (1998) · doi:10.1016/s0981-9428(98)80082-x · Cited by 9
Martin, V., Ribieras, S., Rio, M., & Dante, R. (1998) · Biological chemistry · doi:10.1515/bchm.1998.379.4-5.409 · Cited by 9
Partial Purification of a Pea Seed DNA-Binding Protein That Specifically Recognizes 5-MethyIcytosine
Ehrlich, K. (1993) · Preparative Biochemistry · doi:10.1080/10826069308544567 · Cited by 7
Pagano, L., Lagrotteria, D., Facconi, A., Saraceno, C., Longobardi, A., Bellini, S., Ingannato, A., Bagnoli, S., Ducci, T., Mingrino, A., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26094198 · Cited by 9
“On the contrary, unmethylated CpG islands in promoters result in the transcription of a particular gene [16,17].”
Dudzik, P., Trojan, S., Ostrowska, B., Zemanek, G., Dulińska-Litewka, J., Laidler, P., & Kocemba-Pilarczyk, K. (2019) · Anticancer Research · doi:10.21873/anticanres.13357 · Cited by 8
The Epigenetic Landscape of Aneuploidy: Constitutional Mosaicism Leading the Way?
Davidsson, J. (2014) · Epigenomics · doi:10.2217/epi.13.78 · Cited by 11
Henry, I., Forlani, S., Vaillant, S., Muschler, J., Choulika, A., & Nicolas, J. (1999) · doi:10.1016/s0764-4469(99)00105-5 · Cited by 8
DNA Methylation and retrovirus expression
Bednarik, D. P. (1993) · Birkhäuser Basel eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-9118-9_13 · Cited by 9
Griffiths, J., Finger, A. J., Baerwald, M., Rahman, M. M., Hung, T.-C., Fangue, N., & Whitehead, A. (2025) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1111/eva.70220 · Cited by 7
“The fractions correspond to the number of genes that exceeded the unadjusted p < 0.05 over the total number of genes in that GO category. rearing temperature were primarily involved in immune functions, a common response to prolonged exposure to elevated temperatures in fish (Huang et al. 2018;…”
InfluentialCosta, A. L., Doncevic, D., Wu, Y., Yang, L., Man, K.-H., Spreng, A.-S., Winter, H., Fletcher, M., Radlwimmer, B., & Herrmann, C. (2025) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-025-03670-y · Cited by 7
“Hypermethylation of CGIs at the promoters of tumor suppressor genes is considered to be a key driver of carcinogenesis, and accordingly, therapeutic agents that target the responsible epigenetic enzymes have also shown some efficacy in specific tumors [9–11].”
Episomes and Transposases—Utilities to Maintain Transgene Expression from Nonviral Vectors
Kreppel, F., & Hagedorn, C. (2022) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes13101872 · Cited by 7
A new chimeric protein represses HIV-1 LTR-mediated expression by DNA methylase.
Martinez-Colom, A., Lasarte, S., Fernández-Pineda, A., Relloso, M., & Muñoz-Fernández, M. (2013) · Antiviral Research · doi:10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.04.007 · Cited by 7
“DNA modification by CpG nucleotide methylation can control mRNA transcription (Boyes and Bird, 1992).”
BackgroundTransgenic animals and nutrition research
Prieto, P. A., Kopchick, J. J., & Kelder, B. (1999) · The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0955-2863(99)00063-7 · Cited by 10
Evaluation of methylated DNA binding protein-1 in mouse liver.
Samiec, P. S., & Goodman, J. (1999) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/49.2.255 · Cited by 7
“The degree of methylation in the promoter and body of a gene has been shown to correlate inversely with its expression (Costellot al., 1994) and has a direct influence upon the extent of repression by a methylated DNA-binding protein, e.g., MeCP1 and MeCP2 (Boyes and Bird, 1992; Nanet al., 1997).”
BackgroundInfluentialRewriting DNA Methylation Signatures at Will: The Curable Genome Within Reach?
Stolzenburg, S., Goubert, D., & Rots, M. G. (2016) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-43624-1_17 · Cited by 16
“Gene promoters found with high levels of DNA methylation are generally transcriptionally inactive (Boyes and Bird 1992; Siegfried et al. 1999; Jones and Takai 2001).”
BackgroundPositional cloning and multicolor in situ hybridization. Principles and protocols.
Lebo, R. V., & Su, Y.-B. (1994) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1385/0-89603-280-9:409 · Cited by 7
Robakis, T. K., Lee, S., Werner, E. A., Liu, G., Miller, M., Wylie, D., Champagne, F. A., Salas, M. C., Do, C., Tycko, B., et al. (2020) · Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health · doi:10.1016/j.bbih.2020.100044 · Cited by 6
Total parenteral nutrition induces sustained hypomethylation of DNA in newborn guinea pigs
Yara, S., Levy, E., Elremaly, W., Rouleau, T., & Lavoie, J. (2013) · Pediatric Research · doi:10.1038/pr.2013.35 · Cited by 6
Genomic Instability and DNA Repair
Gagos, S. (2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470025079.chap07.pub2
Identification and Characterization of a Family of Mammalian Methyl-CpG Binding Proteins
Hendrich, B., & Bird, A. P. (1998) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.18.11.6538 · Cited by 1,386
“come by the presence of an enhancer (10).”
Self-citationDNA methylation and gene activity: towards the end of the debate?
Christophe, D., & Pichon, B. (1994) · Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/0303-7207(94)90295-x · Cited by 6
Exploiting Genome Plasticity for the Detection of Hypervariable Sequences
Buiatti, M., & Bogani, P. (1998) · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-0019-6_83 · Cited by 6
Wieland, J., Buchan, S., SenGupta, S. B., & Mantzouratou, A. (2022) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.06.001 · Cited by 5
Grigorenko, E. L., & Burenkova, O. V. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108770422.007 · Cited by 2
Drouet, E. (2019) · Human Herpesvirus Infection - Biological Features, Transmission, Symptoms, Diagnosis and Treatment · doi:10.5772/intechopen.88607 · Cited by 5
Memon, D., Bi, J., & Miller, C. J. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-43758-7 · Cited by 6
Intracrine oestrogen production and action in breast cancer: An epigenetic focus
Knower, K. C., To, S. Q., & Clyne, C. D. (2013) · The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.01.009 · Cited by 3
Epigenetic epidemiology of age-related diseases
Vaiserman, A. M., Voitenko, V. P., & Mekhova, L. (2011) · Russian Journal of Developmental Biology · doi:10.1134/s1062360411010127 · Cited by 8
“It has been shown that even insignificant changes in DNA methylation can significantly change the expression of genes (Boyes and Bird, 1992; Hsieh, 1994).”
BackgroundChang, Z., & Cheng, S. (1992) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications - BBRC · doi:10.1016/0006-291x(92)91583-c · Cited by 5
Zheng, B., Xiaoming, S. H. E. N., Han, N., Guo, X. D., & Wan, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1778348 · Cited by 4
Bogan, S. N., Strader, M., & Hofmann, G. (2021) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.09.23.461091 · Cited by 4
“The majority of ecological epigenomic studies in metazoans have focused on the singular effects of DM on expression, likely due to the predictive power of promoter methylation in vertebrates (Boyes & Bird, 1992).”
BackgroundPotential energy landscapes reveal the information-theoretic nature of the epigenome
Jenkinson, G., Pujadas, E., Goutsias, J., & Feinberg, A. (2016) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/059766 · Cited by 4
Tran, A., Escovedo, C., Migdall-Wilson, J., Chou, A. P., Chen, W.-D., Cloughesy, T., Nelson, S., & Lai, A. (2009) · Front. Neurogen. · doi:10.3389/neuro.15.005.2009 · Cited by 4
“Since CpG dinucleotides cluster in genomic regions called CpG islands that frequently overlap with promoter regions, one of the effects of cytosine methylation is the inhibition of gene transcription by enabling interference via methyl-CpG binding proteins (Boyes and Bird, 1992).”
BackgroundGST Polymorphism: Where to Now? Clinical Applications and Functional Analysis
Holley, S., Fryer, A., Hoban, P., & Strange, R. (2006) · Informa Healthcare eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420004489.ch7 · Cited by 4
Genetic Engineering of Plant Cells
Kahl, G., & Weising, K. (2001) · Biotechnology Set · doi:10.1002/9783527620999.ch15a · Cited by 2
Ichikawa, K. (1998) · DNA Research · doi:10.1093/dnares/5.2.103 · Cited by 3
Chu, C., & Shen, C. ‐. J. (1993) · Birkhäuser Basel eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-9118-9_17 · Cited by 4
Liu, Y.-H., Li, J.-T., Cao, Y.-R., & Lv, M.-Z. (2025) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2025.1583752 · Cited by 3
Dehdari, H., Moradian, F., Barzegar, A., & Ebrahimzadeh, M. (2022) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2022.113062 · Cited by 3
Golyshev, S., Vichreva, P. N., Sheval, E. V., Kiryanov, G., & Polyakov, V. (2008) · Cell and Tissue Biology · doi:10.1134/s1990519x08060059 · Cited by 3
“It has been reported that methyl groups on cytosine residues are sites for binding specific proteins known as MeCP (Boyes and Bird, 1992; Craig, 2004).”
Inhibition of CpG methylation in linker DNA by H1 histone.
d'Erme, M., Santoro, R., Allegra, P., Reale, A., Marenzi, S., Strom, R., & Caiafa, P. (1993) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta · doi:10.1016/0167-4781(93)90183-e · Cited by 3
Kazakov, V., & Tomilin, N. (2004) · Genetica · doi:10.1007/bf00132576 · Cited by 3
“…somatic tissues (Schmid, 1991; Kochanek, Renz & Doerfler, 1993) and binding to Afu (Tomilin et al., 1992) of the CpG-methylation-sensitive proteins (Boyes & Bird, 1992) should not necessarily interfere with their possible enhancer functions, since the presence of a strong transcription enhancer…”
BackgroundPromoters for Expression of Gene Products within Neurons and Glia
Henson, J. (1998) · Humana Press eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-59259-478-8_8 · Cited by 3
Gibson, E. F., Torres-Velarde, J., Ensminger, D. C., Moreno-Santillán, D. D., Crocker, D. E., & Vázquez-Medina, J. (2025) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.250046 · Cited by 2
“Generally, DNA methylation suppresses gene expression as a result of the methyl groups interfering with protein – DNA and DNA – DNA interactions that activate transcription (Boyes and Bird, 1992).”
Lee, E. J., Lee, H., Kang, J., Kim, K., & Yang, Y.-J. (2025) · Environmental Analysis Health and Toxicology · doi:10.5620/eaht.2025s05 · Cited by 2
“A low level of methylation in promoter regions may still permit transcription machinery to bind, and sparsely methylated genes can be activated by enhancers despite the presence of global methylation [51, 53, 54].”
Durable HTT silencing using non-evolved dCas9 epigenome editors in patient-derived cells
Waldo, J. J., Halmai, J. A. N. M., Singh, A., Gonzalez, C. E., Chen, Y., Carthen, S. A., Nolta, J. A., & Fink, K. D. (2025) · Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2025.102561 · Cited by 3
“53 Although unlikely, it is possible that the methylation of a single CpG can affect gene expression if it is in the binding site of a methylation-sensitive transcription factor-binding site.”
Magiera, R., & Fronk, J. (1994) · Cell Biology International · doi:10.1006/cbir.1994.1129 · Cited by 2
“In spite of numerous studies, the mechanisms whereby DNA methylation influences transcription are only beginning to be understood (Boyes and Bird, 1992), while the causes of differential gene methylation remain unknown (see Szyf, 1991 for hypotheses).”
Background5-Methycytosine and 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine in Psychiatric Epigenetics
Grayson, D. R., & Guidotti, A. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-417114-5.00010-3 · Cited by 1
DNA methylation and chromatin structure
Zlatanova, J. S., Stancheva, I., & Caiafa, P. (2004) · New comprehensive biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0167-7306(03)39012-x · Cited by 7
Chapter 5.3 Trinucleotide repeat disorders
Sandberg, G., Lindblad‐Toh, K., Oostra, B. A., Schalling, M., Crusio, W. E., Gerlai, R. T., & Huston, J. P. (1999) · Techniques in the behavioral and neural sciences · doi:10.1016/s0921-0709(99)80060-1
Methylated DNA-binding proteins and chromatin structure
Meehan, R., Jeppesen, P., Lewis, J., & Bird, A. (1993) · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-1510-0_29 · Cited by 2
Self-citationTelle, W., & Hildebrandt, A. (1992) · doi:10.1016/s0309-1651(05)80048-7 · Cited by 2
Sun, L.-F., Miao, X.-F., Cui, J., Deng, J.-W., Wang, X., Wang, Y.-F., Zhang, Y., Gao, S., & Yang, K.-J. (2018) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/s10681-017-2076-0 · Cited by 1
“Even if it is possible, this effect could be overcome by an enhancer (Boyes and Bird 1992).”
BackgroundThe Effects of Larval Cryopreservation on the Epigenetics of the Pacific Oyster Crassostrea gigas
Liu, Y.-B., Bao, L.-S., Catalano, S. R., Zhu, X.-C., & Li, X. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms242417262 · Cited by 1
“In mammals, DNA methylation generally occurs at the promoter regions with the hyper ‐ methylation of promoters having the potential to inhibit the initiation of transcription [30].”
BackgroundDifferential Methylation of Microsatellite and Minisatellite Loci in Rice
Ramakrishna, W., Gupta, V. S., & Ranjekar, P. (1999) · doi:10.1007/bf03543550 · Cited by 1
Identification and characterization of a family of mammalian methyl CpG-binding proteins
Hendrich, B., & Bird, A. P. (1998) · Genetics Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672398533307 · Cited by 17
Self-citationAnne, A., Kumar, L., Singh, M., Choudhury, S., Das, S., Zimmer-Bensch, G., Bandyopadhyay, D., & Mohan, K. N. (2026) · bioRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.07.18.738653
“In several autosomal genes with CGI promoters, the strength of gene repression is directly proportional to the density of methylated CpGs 8,9 .”
Marcoli, R., Jones, D. B., Massault, C., Moran, M., Harrison, P., Cate, H., & Jerry, D. (2026) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/jfb.70325
Xia, Y.-X., Zhang, Y., Zheng, C., Wang, J., Di, W.-Y., Zhang, M., & Yang, M. (2025) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2025.1585450
CpGmotifs: a tool to discover DNA motifs associated to CpG methylation events
Scala, G., Federico, A., & Greco, D. (2021) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-021-04191-8 · Cited by 2
“composition and the stability of the associated methylation patterns [3, 4].”
BackgroundEfeito de antagonistas do receptor NMDA sobre a metilação do DNA
Montezuma, K. (2017) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/d.60.2017.tde-24102016-163014
Editing of DNA epigenetic modifications
Грин, И. Р., Petrova, D. V., & Zharkov, D. O. (2016) · Genes and Cells · doi:10.23868/gc120575
Chatagnon, A. (2009) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/961a765bz6db3z4b84zb18fz9f5730f0bb83
“Ce complexe, découvert 10 ans plus tôt, a été le premier complexe caractérisé pour ses propriétés de fixation à l’ADN méthylé et d’induction de la répression transcriptionnelle (Meehan et al., 1989;Antequera et al., 1990;Boyes and Bird, 1991;Boyes and Bird, 1992).”
Cancer-Linked DNA Hypermethylation and Hypomethylation
Ehrlich, M. (2008) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420045802.ch13
DNA Structures of Biological Relevance, Studies of Unusual Sequences
Wang, Y.-H. (2006) · Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1002/9780470027318.a1409
One Carbon Metabolism and Methylation in Breast Tumors
Sumner, S. B., & Shields, P. G. (2004) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · doi:10.21236/ada428992
Potential CpG-rich islands clustering around single-minded gene in Down syndrome chromosomal region
Osoegawa, K., Susukida, R., Okano, S., Kato, Y., Lehrach, H., Nižetić, D., & Soeda, E. (1996) · Mammalian Genome · doi:10.1007/s003359900134
5-Methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in psychiatric epigenetics
Grayson, D. R., & Dunn, J. T. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-823577-5.00033-7
Role of senataxin in RNA : DNA hybrids resolution at DNA double strand breaks
Cohen, S. (2019) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/465fb65cz43b4z4822z956czcf570478abea
“Promoter regions with unmethylated CpG are usually active promoters whereas inactive/silenced promoters are characterized by important methylated 5mCpG (Boyes and Bird, 1992).”
Eid, A. (2016) · Digital Commons - URI (University of Rhode Island) · doi:10.23860/diss-eid-aseel-2016
Turnover and function of DNA methylation at transcription factor binding sites
Feldmann, A. (2014) · edoc (University of Basel) · doi:10.5451/unibas-006266256
“Regions with a high correlation between silencing and DNA methylation have an elevated CpG density, suggesting that the density of DNA methylation is more decisive for gene repression than the pure presence of the mark (Boyes and Bird 1992; Weber et al, 2007).”
BackgroundEvolution or adaptation? What do heritable adaptive changes imply?
Irmak, M. (2014) · doi:10.5455/jeim.021113.hp.008
“The methyl group does not change the coding properties of the base, but may influence the gene expression [3, 12].”
BackgroundGlobal DNA Demethylation During Erythropoiesis: A Dissertation
Shearstone, J. R. (2011) · The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) · doi:10.13028/hs36-k802
Mechanisms of Epigenetic Gene Activation in Disease: Dynamics of DNA Methylation and Demethylation
Grange, T., & Lourenço, É. E. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-84882-644-1_4 · Cited by 1
Franklin, T. B. (2009) · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · doi:10.3929/ethz-a-005948772
“This extends previous evidence demonstrating that it is the density of DNA methylation rather than the pattern of DNA methylation itself which is most important for regulating gene transcription (Boyes and Bird, 1992; Lorincz, Schubeler et al, 2002).”
BackgroundEntwicklung von Realtime-PCR-Methoden zur Analyse von DNA-Methylierung
Tetzner, R. (2007) · Publications of the UdS (Saarland University) · doi:10.22028/d291-22376
Embryo Manipulation for Biotechnology in Domestic Animals
Tatham, B. (2006) · Books in soils, plants, and the environment · doi:10.1201/9781420049275.ch18
Molecular Biology of Human Lung Cancer
Dong, X., & Li, M. (2002) · Humana Press eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-59259-093-3_4
Markman, M. (2002) · Current Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/978-1-59259-093-3
Metadata
- Authors
- Boyes, J., & Bird, A.
- Affiliations
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (AT)
- Venue
- The EMBO Journal
- Published
- 1992-01-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 327-333
- ISSN
- 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2075
- PMC
- PMC556453
- OpenAlex
- W1821654469
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 9.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
- Keywords
- DNA methylation, transcriptional repression, CpG density, promoter strength, methyl-CpG binding proteins, SV40 enhancer, gene reactivation, transcriptional silencing
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Binding Sites, DNA-Binding Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Globins, Methylation, Models, Genetic, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Simian virus 40, Transcription, Genetic, Transfection, DNA Modification Methylases, DNA-Cytosine Methylases, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review