The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Different activation domains stimulate transcription from remote (‘enhancer’) and proximal (‘promoter’) positions.
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schreiber, E., Matthias, P., Müller, M. M., & Schaffner, W. (1989) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/17.15.6419 · Cited by 4,179
Self-citationTranscriptional Regulation in Mammalian Cells by Sequence-Specific DNA Binding Proteins
Mitchell, P. J., & Tjian, R. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2667136 · Cited by 3,114
Expression of a β-globin gene is enhanced by remote SV40 DNA sequences
Banerji, J., Rusconi, S., & Schaffner, W. (1981) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(81)90413-x · Cited by 1,724
Self-citationCourey, A. J., & Tjian, R. (1988) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(88)90144-4 · Cited by 1,354
GAL4-VP16 is an unusually potent transcriptional activator
Sadowski, I., Ma, J., Triezenberg, S., & Ptashne, M. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/335563a0 · Cited by 1,333
Control of eukaryotic messenger RNA synthesis by sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins
Dynan, W. S., & Tjian, R. (1985) · Nature · doi:10.1038/316774a0 · Cited by 1,191
Functional dissection of a eukaryotic transcriptional activator protein, GCN4 of Yeast
Hope, I. A., & Struhl, K. (1986) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(86)90070-x · Cited by 880
Deletion analysis of GAL4 defines two transcriptional activating segments
Ma, J., & Ptashne, M. (1987) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(87)90081-x · Cited by 858
Triezenberg, S. J., Kingsbury, R. C., & McKnight, S. L. (1988) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.2.6.718 · Cited by 811
The p65 subunit is responsible for the strong transcription activating potential of NF-kappa B.
Schmitz, M. L., & Baeuerle, P. A. (1991) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04950.x · Cited by 796
Cited by
Asakawa, K., Suster, M. L., Mizusawa, K., Nagayoshi, S., Kotani, T., Urasaki, A., Kishimoto, Y., Hibi, M., & Kawakami, K. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0704963105 · Cited by 560
Sizemore, N., Leung, S., & Stark, G. R. (1999) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.19.7.4798 · Cited by 557
Klucher, K. M., Chow, H., Reiser, L., & Fischer, R. L. (1996) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.8.2.137 · Cited by 485
Pip, a novel IRF family member, is a lymphoid-specific, PU.1-dependent transcriptional activator.
Eisenbeis, C. F., Singh, H., & Storb, U. (1995) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.9.11.1377 · Cited by 447
Positive and negative regulation of endogenous genes by designed transcription factors
Beerli, R. R., Dreier, B., & Barbas, C. F. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.040552697 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Seipel, K., Georgiev, O., & Schaffner, W.
- Venue
- The EMBO Journal
- Published
- 1992-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 4961-4968
- ISSN
- 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1958059146
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 8.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Different activation domains stimulate transcription from remote (‘enhancer’) and proximal (‘promoter’) positions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05603.x
- The paper
- Seipel, K., Georgiev, O., & Schaffner, W. (1992). Different activation domains stimulate transcription from remote (‘enhancer’) and proximal (‘promoter’) positions. The EMBO Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05603.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
