The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION, SYMPATRIC SPECIATION, AND THE ORIGIN OF A DIPLOID SPECIES OF STEPHANOMERIA
Abstract
Evidence is presented that a geographically peripheral population of the annual Stephanomcria exigua ssp. coronaria (Compositae), a widespread and ecologically diverse species, has recently given rise by a process of sympatric speciation to a diploid species presently designated “Malheurensis.” The new species comprises less than 250 individuals and is found only at a single locality in eastern Oregon where it grows interspersed with its parental population. Stephanomeria exigua ssp. coronaria is an obligate outcrosser and “Malheurensis” is highly self‐pollinating. Reproductive isolation is maintained by differences in breeding system, a crossability barrier that reduces seed set following cross‐pollination between them, and reduction in hybrid fertility caused by chromosomal structural differences. They are very similar morphologically. Electrophoretic analyses of seven enzyme systems demonstrate that all the alleles but one at the controlling 13 gene loci in “Malheurensis” are identical to alleles in ssp. coronaria . The new species displays certain maladapted features including loss of the specific requirements for seed germination characteristic of the progenitor population of ssp. coronaria . The origin of “Malheurensis” appears to be an exception to the theory of geographical speciation because spatial isolation is not necessary at any time for the origin or establishment of its reproductive isolating barriers. The nature of these barriers plus the genetic homogeneity of the species are compatible with the hypothesis that it derives from a single progenitor individual. Very little genetic change is involved initially in this mode of speciation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
Cited by
THE EVOLUTION OF SELF‐FERTILIZATION AND INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN PLANTS. I. GENETIC MODELS
Lande, R., & Schemske, D. W. (1985) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb04077.x · Cited by 1,648
Electrophoretic Evidence and Plant Systematics
Gottlieb, L. D. (1977) · Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden · doi:10.2307/2395330 · Cited by 365
Self-citationKarron, J. D. (1987) · Evolutionary Ecology · doi:10.1007/bf02067268 · Cited by 362
Phylogenetic and Systematic Inferences from Electrophoretic Studies
(1983) · Developments in Plant Genetics and Breeding · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-42226-2.50018-9 · Cited by 336
Pollinator–Plant Interactions and the Evolution of Breeding Systems
WYATT, R. (1983) · Pollination Biology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-583980-8.50011-9 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Gottlieb, L. D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1973-07
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 545-553
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W2067096581
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION, SYMPATRIC SPECIATION, AND THE ORIGIN OF A DIPLOID SPECIES OF STEPHANOMERIA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1973.tb05956.x
- The paper
- Gottlieb, L. D. (1973). GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION, SYMPATRIC SPECIATION, AND THE ORIGIN OF A DIPLOID SPECIES OF STEPHANOMERIA. American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1973.tb05956.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.