The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comparison of levels of genetic polymorphism and self-compatibility in geographically restricted and widespread plant congeners
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research
Sokal, R. R., & Rohlf, F. J. (1969) · Cited by 20,963
Biometry. The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research
Fienberg, S. E., Sokal, R. R., Rohlf, F. J., Rohlf, F. J., & Sokal, R. R. (1970) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529087 · Cited by 9,364
EVOLUTION IN MENDELIAN POPULATIONS
Wright, S. (1931) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/16.2.97 · Cited by 8,916
Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research (2nd ed.).
Bailey, K., Sokal, R. R., & Rohlf, F. J. (1982) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2287349 · Cited by 3,728
THE BOTTLENECK EFFECT AND GENETIC VARIABILITY IN POPULATIONS
Nei, M., Maruyama, T., & Chakraborty, R. (1975) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1975.tb00807.x · Cited by 3,498
Ecological Determinants of Genetic Structure in Plant Populations
Loveless, M. D., & Hamrick, J. L. (1984) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.000433 · Cited by 2,060
Minimum Population Sizes for Species Conservation
Shaffer, M. L. (1981) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1308256 · Cited by 2,014
(1945) · Annals of the Entomological Society of America · doi:10.1093/aesa/38.3.396 · Cited by 1,852
Grant, V. (1981) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/gran92318 · Cited by 1,741
THE EVOLUTION OF SELF‐FERTILIZATION AND INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN PLANTS. I. GENETIC MODELS
Lande, R., & Schemske, D. W. (1985) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb04077.x · Cited by 1,648
Cited by
Population Genetic Consequences of Small Population Size: Implications for Plant Conservation
Ellstrand, N. C. (1993) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.24.1.217 · Cited by 2,631
Effects of inbreeding on the genetic diversity of populations
Charlesworth, D. (2003) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2003.1296 · Cited by 466
Lavergne, S., Thompson, J. D., Garnier, E., & Debussche, M. (2004) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13423.x · Cited by 419
The biology of rarity: Patterns, causes and consequences
Kunin, W. E., & Gaston, K. J. (1993) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(93)90259-r · Cited by 364
Genetic diversity of Anopheles stephensi in Ethiopia provides insight into patterns of spread
Carter, T. E., Yared, S., Getachew, D., Spear, J., Choi, S. H., Samake, J. N., Mumba, P., Dengela, D., Yohannes, G., Chibsa, S., et al. (2021) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/s13071-021-05097-3 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Karron, J. D.
- Venue
- Evolutionary Ecology
- Published
- 1987-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-58
- ISSN
- 0269-7653 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-8477
- OpenAlex
- W1967101189
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 2.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of levels of genetic polymorphism and self-compatibility in geographically restricted and widespread plant congeners. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02067268
- The paper
- Karron, J. D. (1987). A comparison of levels of genetic polymorphism and self-compatibility in geographically restricted and widespread plant congeners. Evolutionary Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02067268
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
