The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
D ioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants
Abstract
Considerable effort has been spent documenting correlations between dioecy and various ecological and morphological traits for the purpose of testing hypotheses about conditions that favor dioecy. The data analyzed in these studies, with few exceptions, come from local floras, within which it was possible to contrast the subsets of dioecious and nondioecious taxa with regard to the traits in question. However, if there is a strong phylogenetic component to the presence or absence of dioecy, regional sampling may result in spurious associations. Here, we report results of a categorical multivariate analysis of the strengths of various associations of dioecy with other traits over all flowering plants. Families were scored for presence of absence of monoecy or dioecy, systematic position, numbers of species and genera, growth forms, modes of pollination and dispersal, geographic distribution, and trophic status. Seven percent of angiosperm genera (959 of 13,500) contain at least some dioecious species, and ≈6% of angiosperm species (14,620 of 240,000) are dioecious. The most consistent associations in the data set relate the presence of dioecy to monoecy, wind or water pollination, and climbing growth. At both the family and the genus level, insect pollination is underrepresented among dioecious plants. At the family level, a positive correlation between dioecy and woody growth results primarily from the association between dioecy and climbing growth (whether woody or herbaceous) because neither the tree nor the shrub growth forms alone are consistently correlated with a family's tendency to include dioecious members. Dioecy appears to have evolved most frequently via monoecy, perhaps through divergent adjustments of floral sex ratios between individual plants. Monoecy itself is related to abiotic pollination and climbing growth as revealed by multivariate analysis. Dioecy and monoecy are concentrated in the less advanced superorders of Thorne (1992) and subclasses of Cronquist (1988). The frequency of dioecy found in a local flora therefore reflects the level of dioecy in its particular pool of families as much as, or more than, local selective factors. The positive associations of dioecy with abiotic pollination and monoecy are related to floral developmental and morphological attributes, as is the negative association with bird and bat pollination; the positive association of dioecy with climbing growth is tentatively explained in terms of differential selection for optimal resource allocation to sexual function. If rapid upward growth is at a premium in climbers and if fruit set at least temporarily inhibits growth or requires the production of thicker, more slowly growing stems to support heavy fruits, it might be advantageous to postpone femaleness. If the effect is strong, this may favor male plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Flowering Plants. Eudicots: Malpighiales
(2014) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39417-1 · Cited by 2,936
The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants
Schmid, R., Kubitzki, K., Kubitzki, K., & Kadereit, J. W. (2005) · Taxon · doi:10.2307/25065407 · Cited by 2,732
Variation and Evolution in Plants
Stebbins, G. L. (1950) · doi:10.7312/steb94536 · Cited by 2,704
Richards, A. J. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3043-9 · Cited by 1,847
Evolution and classification of flowering plants
(1979) · Brittonia · doi:10.1007/bf02806171 · Cited by 1,790
Nelson, E. C., & Mabberley, D. J. (1987) · Cited by 1,436
A Model for the Evolution of Dioecy and Gynodioecy
Charlesworth, B., & Charlesworth, D. (1978) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283342 · Cited by 1,298
The effects of cross and self fertilisation in the vegetable kingdom
Darwin, C., (Firm), J. M., Sons, W. C. A., & Bradbury, A. A. C. (1878) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.104481 · Cited by 1,062
The effects of cross and self fertilisation in the vegetable kingdom /
Charles, D., & Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. (1876) · J. Murray eBooks · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.110800 · Cited by 1,054
Evolution of Dioecy in Flowering Plants
Bawa, K. S. (1980) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.000311 · Cited by 961
Cited by
Polyploid incidence and evolution
Otto, S. P., & Whitton, J. (2000) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.401 · Cited by 2,363
In Posidonia oceanica cadmium induces changes in DNA methylation and chromatin patterning
Greco, M., Chiappetta, A., Bruno, L., & Bitonti, M. B. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/err313 · Cited by 538
Evolution and classification of Cannabis sativa (marijuana, hemp) in relation to human utilization.
Small, E. (2015) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/s12229-015-9157-3 · Cited by 461
Floral Reward, Advertisement and Attractiveness to Honey Bees in Dioecious Salix caprea
Dötterl, S., Glück, U., Jürgens, A., Woodring, J., & Aas, G. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093421 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Renner, S. S., & Ricklefs, R. E.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 596-606
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W2012657725
- Cited by
- 911
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 14.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: D ioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1995.tb11504.x
- The paper
- Renner, S. S., & Ricklefs, R. E. (1995). D ioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1995.tb11504.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.