Polyploid incidence and evolution
Abstract
▪ Abstract Changes in ploidy occurred early in the diversification of some animal and plant lineages and represent an ongoing phenomenon in others. While the prevalence of polyploid lineages indicates that this phenomenon is a common and successful evolutionary transition, whether polyploidization itself has a significant effect on patterns and rates of diversification remains an open question. Here we review evidence for the creative role of polyploidy in evolution. We present new estimates for the incidence of polyploidy in ferns and flowering plants based on a simple model describing transitions between odd and even base chromosome numbers. These new estimates indicate that ploidy changes may represent from 2 to 4% of speciation events in flowering plants and 7% in ferns. Speciation via polyploidy is likely to be one of the more predominant modes of sympatric speciation in plants, owing to its potentially broad-scale effects on gene regulation and developmental processes, effects that can produce immediate shifts in morphology, breeding system, and ecological tolerances. Theoretical models support the potential for increased adaptability in polyploid lineages. The evidence suggests that polyploidization can produce shifts in genetic systems and phenotypes that have the potential to result in increased evolutionary diversification, yet conclusive evidence that polyploidy has changed rates and patterns of diversification remains elusive.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Whole-genome duplication is far more common in plants than in animals.
“given that whole-genome duplication (WGD) is far more common in plants than it is in animals (Otto and Whitton, 2000)”
From Genomics of plant speciation (2023) · cites this paper as Otto and Whitton, 2000
Cites
Paquin, C., & Adams, J. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/302495a0 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hybridization as an invasion of the genome
Mallet, J. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.010 · Cited by 2,196 · see citing works
Ecology and the origin of species
Schluter, D. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02198-x · Cited by 1,878 · see citing works
The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications
Van de Peer, Y., Maere, S., & Meyer, A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2600 · Cited by 1,129 · see citing works
A Recent Polyploidy Superimposed on Older Large-Scale Duplications in the <i>Arabidopsis</i> Genome
Blanc, G., Hokamp, K., & Wolfe, K. H. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.751803 · Cited by 724 · see citing works
Sympatric speciation in palms on an oceanic island
Savolainen, V., Anstett, M.-C., Lexer, C., Hutton, I., Clarkson, J. J., Norup, M. V., Powell, M. P., Springate, D., Salamin, N., & Baker, W. J. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04566 · Cited by 681 · see citing works
Redundancy, antiredundancy, and the robustness of genomes
Krakauer, D. C., & Plotkin, J. B. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.032668599 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Polyploid titan cells produce haploid and aneuploid progeny to promote stress adaptation
Gerstein, A. C., Fu, M. S., Mukaremera, L., Li, Z., Ormerod, K. L., Fraser, J. A., Berman, J., & Nielsen, K. (2015) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.01340-15 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Liu, Z., & Adams, K. L. (2007) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.030 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Ploidy Variation in Fungi: Polyploidy, Aneuploidy, and Genome Evolution
Todd, R. T., Forche, A., & Selmecki, A. (2017) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.funk-0051-2016 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Bock, D. G., Cai, Z., Elphinstone, C., González-Segovia, E., Hirabayashi, K., Huang, K., Keais, G. L., Kim, A., Owens, G. L., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2023) · Plant Communications · doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100599 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
“Starting in first half of the 1900s (M€untzing, 1936; Darlington, 1937; Stebbins, 1950) and continuing more recently (Masterson, 1994; Otto and Whitton, 2000), evolutionary biologists have used estimates of base chromosome numbers, the fossil record, and phylogenies to understand the evolutionary…”
InfluentialMassey, S. (2015) · Life · doi:10.3390/life5021301 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“evolvability in plants [122,123]”
The origins and functions of hepatic polyploidy
Zhang, S., Lin, Y.-H., Tarlow, B., & Zhu, H. (2019) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.1080/15384101.2019.1618123 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
- Authors
- Otto, S. P., & Whitton, J.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Genetics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 401-437
- ISSN
- 0066-4197 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2948
- OpenAlex
- W2168557059
- Cited by
- 2,363
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 65 · 2025: 103 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 144 · 2021: 142 · 2020: 111 · 2019: 116 · 2018: 114 · 2017: 128 · 2016: 101 · 2015: 97 · 2014: 129 · 2013: 112 · 2012: 115
- FWCI
- 2.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
- Keywords
- polyploidy, polyploidization, speciation, sympatric speciation, diversification rates, ferns, flowering plants, chromosome number evolution, plant evolution
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biological Evolution, Plants, Polyploidy, Gene Duplication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review