The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understory shrub, PSYCHOTRIA OFFICINALIS (RuBIACEAE)
Abstract
Analyses of fine‐scale and macrogeographic genetic structure in plant populations provide an initial indication of how gene flow, natural selection, and genetic drift may collectively influence the distribution of genetic variation. The objective of our study is to evaluate the spatial dispersion of alleles within and among subpopulations of a tropical shrub, Psychotria officinalis (Rubiaceae), in a lowland wet forest in Costa Rica. This insect‐pollinated, self‐incompatible understory plant is dispersed primarily by birds, some species of which drop the seeds immediately while others transport seeds away from the parent plant. Thus, pollination should promote gene flow while at least one type of seed dispersal agent might restrict gene flow. Sampling from five subpopulations in undisturbed wet forest at Estación Biologíca La Selva, Costa Rica, we used electrophoretically detected isozyme markers to examine the spatial scale of genetic structure. Our goals are: 1) describe genetic diversity of each of the five subpopulations of Psychotria officinalis sampled within a contiguous wet tropical forest; 2) evaluate fine‐scale genetic structure of adults of P. officinalis within a single 2.25‐ha mapped plot; and 3) estimate genetic structure of P. officinalis using data from five subpopulations located up to 2 km apart. Using estimates of coancestry, statistical analyses reveal significant positive genetic correlations between individuals on a scale of 5 m but no significant genetic relatedness beyond that interplant distance within the studied subpopulation. Multilocus estimates of genetic differentiation among subpopulations were low, but significant (Fst = 0.095). Significant Fst estimates were largely attributable to a single locus (Lap‐2). Thus, multilocus estimates of Fst may be influenced by microgeographic selection. If true, then the observed levels of IBD may be overestimates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Environmental correlates of population differentiation in Atlantic herring
Bekkevold, D., Aandré3, C., Dahlgren, T. G., Clausen, L. A. W., Torstensen, E., Mosegaard, H., Carvalho, G. R., Christensen, T. B., Norlinder, E., & Ruzzante, D. E. (2005) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00977.x · Cited by 1,223
Cited by
New insights from fine‐scale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations
Vekemans, X., & Hardy, O. J. (2004) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2004.02076.x · Cited by 1,313
Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure
Smouse, P. E., & Peakall, R. (1999) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6885180 · Cited by 1,083
ARNAUD‐HAOND, S., & BELKHIR, K. (2007) · Molecular Ecology Notes · doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01522.x · Cited by 872
Status and prospects of genome‐wide association studies in plants
Tibbs Cortes, L., Zhang, Z., & Yu, J. (2021) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.1002/tpg2.20077 · Cited by 470
Relatedness in the post-genomic era: is it still useful?
Speed, D., & Balding, D. J. (2015) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3821 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Loiselle, B. A., Sork, V. L., Nason, J., & Graham, C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1420-1425
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W2025621308
- Cited by
- 1,337
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understory shrub, PSYCHOTRIA OFFICINALIS (RuBIACEAE). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1995.tb12679.x
- The paper
- Loiselle, B. A., Sork, V. L., Nason, J., & Graham, C. (1995). Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understory shrub, PSYCHOTRIA OFFICINALIS (RuBIACEAE). American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1995.tb12679.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.