The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New insights from fine‐scale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations
Abstract
Many empirical studies have assessed fine‐scale spatial genetic structure (SGS), i.e. the nonrandom spatial distribution of genotypes, within plant populations using genetic markers and spatial autocorrelation techniques. These studies mostly provided qualitative descriptions of SGS, rendering quantitative comparisons among studies difficult. The theory of isolation by distance can predict the pattern of SGS under limited gene dispersal, suggesting new approaches, based on the relationship between pairwise relatedness coefficients and the spatial distance between individuals, to quantify SGS and infer gene dispersal parameters. Here we review the theory underlying such methods and discuss issues about their application to plant populations, such as the choice of the relatedness statistics, the sampling scheme to adopt, the procedure to test SGS, and the interpretation of spatial autocorrelograms. We propose to quantify SGS by an ‘Sp’ statistic primarily dependent upon the rate of decrease of pairwise kinship coefficients between individuals with the logarithm of the distance in two dimensions. Under certain conditions, this statistic estimates the reciprocal of the neighbourhood size. Reanalysing data from, mostly, published studies, the Sp statistic was assessed for 47 plant species. It was found to be significantly related to the mating system (higher in selfing species) and to the life form (higher in herbs than trees), as well as to the population density (higher under low density). We discuss the necessity for comparing SGS with direct estimates of gene dispersal distances, and show how the approach presented can be extended to assess (i) the level of biparental inbreeding, and (ii) the kurtosis of the gene dispersal distribution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE GENETICAL STRUCTURE OF POPULATIONS
WRIGHT, S. (1949) · Annals of Eugenics · doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.1949.tb02451.x · Cited by 6,753
Wright, S. (1943) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/28.2.114 · Cited by 5,479
Hardy, O. J., & Vekemans, X. (2002) · Molecular Ecology Notes · doi:10.1046/j.1471-8286.2002.00305.x · Cited by 3,557
Self-citationESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERS
Queller, D. C., & Goodnight, K. F. (1989) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04226.x · Cited by 3,032
Allozyme diversity in plant species
Hamrick, J. L., & Godt, M. J. W. (1990) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,643
Genetic Differentiation and Estimation of Gene Flow from F -Statistics Under Isolation by Distance
Rousset, F. (1997) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/145.4.1219 · Cited by 2,496
Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers
LYNCH, M., & MILLIGAN, B. G. (1994) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.1994.tb00109.x · Cited by 2,018
Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review
Frankham, R. (1995) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672300034455 · Cited by 1,370
Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understory shrub, PSYCHOTRIA OFFICINALIS (RuBIACEAE)
Loiselle, B. A., Sork, V. L., Nason, J., & Graham, C. (1995) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.1002/j.1537-2197.1995.tb12679.x · Cited by 1,337
Environmental correlates of population differentiation in Atlantic herring
Bekkevold, D., Aandré3, C., Dahlgren, T. G., Clausen, L. A. W., Torstensen, E., Mosegaard, H., Carvalho, G. R., Christensen, T. B., Norlinder, E., & Ruzzante, D. E. (2005) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00977.x · Cited by 1,223
Cited by
The trouble with isolation by distance
MEIRMANS, P. G. (2012) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05578.x · Cited by 624
Speciation has a spatial scale that depends on levels of gene flow
Kisel, Y., & Barraclough, T. G. (2010) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/650369 · Cited by 496
Applications of landscape genetics in conservation biology: concepts and challenges
Segelbacher, G., Cushman, S. A., Epperson, B. K., Fortin, M.-J., Francois, O., Hardy, O. J., Holderegger, R., Taberlet, P., Waits, L. P., & Manel, S. (2010) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-009-0044-5 · Cited by 470
Self-citationStatistical methods in spatial genetics
GUILLOT, G., LEBLOIS, R., COULON, A., & FRANTZ, A. C. (2009) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04410.x · Cited by 409
Population genomics of marine fishes: identifying adaptive variation in space and time
NIELSEN, E. E., HEMMER‐HANSEN, J., LARSEN, P. F., & BEKKEVOLD, D. (2009) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04272.x · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Vekemans, X., & Hardy, O. J.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-01-16
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 921-935
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2134978806
- Cited by
- 1,313
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 21.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New insights from fine‐scale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2004.02076.x
- The paper
- Vekemans, X., & Hardy, O. J. (2004). New insights from fine‐scale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2004.02076.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.