The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Epidemiologic Study of Ocular Refraction among Schoolchildren in Taiwan in 1995
Abstract
PURPOSE: In order to understand and update the prevalence of myopia in Taiwan, a nationwide survey was performed in 1995. METHODS: We stratified the cluster sampling by developmental grading of the city, using a size proportional to the population. Two cities were randomly selected from each city grading. The total number of students enrolled was 11,178, including 5,676 boys and 5,502 girls. The refractive status and corneal radius of each student were measured with an autorefractometer under cycloplegia and checked with retinoscopy. Axial length was measured with biometric ultrasound. RESULTS: The myopic rate was from 12% at the age of 6, it increased to 56% at the age of 12, and then to 76% at the age of 15. A myopic rate of 84% was found for the age range of 16 to 18. The prevalence of high myopia (over -6.0 D) at the age of 18 was 20% in girls and 12% in boys. The mean refractive status became myopic at the age of 9, then increased to -3.92 D in girls and -2.71 D in boys at the age of 18. The increase of axial length is correspondent with the progression of myopia. The anterior chamber depth (ACD) was deeper with age and the severity of myopia, whereas the corneal curvature remained unchanged. The lens thickness became thinner from age 7 to 13, then it became thicker with age and the severity of myopia after age 15. The prevalence and degree of myopia in girls was more severe than in boys. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of myopia in Taiwan increased year by year. The increase in severity and prevalence of high myopia may be due to earlier onset.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prevalence of Myopia in Taiwanese Schoolchildren: 1983 to 2000
Lin, L., Shih, Y., Hsiao, C., & Chen, C. (2004) · Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore · doi:10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.v33n1p27 · Cited by 837
Self-citationRefractive Error and Visual Impairment in Urban Children in Southern China
He, M., Zeng, J., Liu, Y., Xu, J., Pokharel, G. P., & Ellwein, L. B. (2004) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.03-1051 · Cited by 788
(2002) · PubMed · Cited by 735
Outdoor Activity during Class Recess Reduces Myopia Onset and Progression in School Children
Wu, P.-C., Tsai, C.-L., Wu, H.-L., Yang, Y.-H., & Kuo, H.-K. (2013) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.11.009 · Cited by 688
Self-citationRole of the sclera in the development and pathological complications of myopia
McBrien, N. (2003) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/s1350-9462(02)00063-0 · Cited by 616
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, L. L., Shih, Y., Tsai, C., Chen, C., LEE, L.-A., Hung, P., & Hou, P.
- Venue
- Optometry and Vision Science
- Publisher
- Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
- Published
- 1999-05-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 275-281
- ISSN
- 1040-5488 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009348736
- Cited by
- 472
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiologic Study of Ocular Refraction among Schoolchildren in Taiwan in 1995. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.1538-9235.1999.tb05395.x
- The paper
- Lin, L. L., Shih, Y., Tsai, C., Chen, C., LEE, L.-A., Hung, P., & Hou, P. (1999). Epidemiologic Study of Ocular Refraction among Schoolchildren in Taiwan in 1995. Optometry and Vision Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-9235.1999.tb05395.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.