The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Slicing the Onion Ethnographically: Layers and Spaces in Multilingual Language Education Policy and Practice
Abstract
In this article, we take up the call for more multilayered and ethnographic approaches to language policy and planning (LPP) research by sharing two examples of how ethnography can illuminate local interpretation and implementation. We offer ethnographic data collected in two very different institutions—the School District of Philadelphia and the Andean regional graduate program in bilingual intercultural education in Cochabamba, Bolivia—both of which act as intermediary agencies between national language policies and local educational initiatives. Drawing from long‐term ethnographic work in each context, we present excerpts from spoken and written discourse that shed light on the opening up or closing down of ideological and implementational spaces for multilingual language education policy and practice. We illustrate through our examples that ethnographic research can, metaphorically speaking, slice through the layers of the LPP onion (Ricento & Hornberger, 1996) to reveal agentive spaces in which local actors implement, interpret, and perhaps resist policy initiatives in varying and unique ways.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space
Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano‐López, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999) · Mind, Culture, and Activity · doi:10.1080/10749039909524733 · Cited by 1,281
A Place to Be Navajo: Rough Rock and the Struggle for Self-Determination in Indigenous Schooling
McCarty, T. L. (2002) · doi:10.4324/9781410602503 · Cited by 353
Cited by
Educator language ideologies and a top-down dual language program
Fitzsimmons-Doolan, S., Palmer, D., & Henderson, K. (2017) · International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism · doi:10.1080/13670050.2015.1071776 · Cited by 79
Zúñiga, C. E. (2016) · Bilingual Research Journal · doi:10.1080/15235882.2016.1242438 · Cited by 53
Students' multilingual resources and policy-in-action: an Australian case study
French, M. (2016) · Language and Education · doi:10.1080/09500782.2015.1114628 · Cited by 47
Cru, J. (2017) · International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism · doi:10.1080/13670050.2015.1051945 · Cited by 30
Elshafie, M., Cole, M. W., & Zhang, J. (2023) · Journal of Education, Language, and Ideology · doi:10.67372/dd687d05 · Cited by 3
“Other writers refer to teachers' contradictory language ideologies as "ideological tension" (Fitzsimmons-Doolan et al., 2017; Freeman, 2004; Hornberger & Johnson, 2007).”
Metadata
- Authors
- HORNBERGER, N. H., & JOHNSON, D. C.
- Venue
- TESOL Quarterly
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 509-532
- ISSN
- 0039-8322 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7249
- OpenAlex
- W2138307897
- Cited by
- 694
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 45.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.