Cited by 65Second Language Acquisition and LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningReading and Literacy Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Relationship Between Cognate Awareness and English Comprehension Among Spanish—English Bilingual Fourth Grade Students

PROCTOR, C. PATRICK, MO, ELAINE·2009·TESOL Quarterly

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00232.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Anderson R. C., 1981, Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews, 77
  2. August D., 2001, Cognate Awareness Test
  3. 10.1598/RRQ.39.2.3 · DOI
  4. Coady J., 1993, Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy, 225
  5. 10.3102/00346543049002222 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Cummins J., 1984, Language proficiency and academic achievement, 2
  7. 10.1017/S0142716400065905 · DOI
  8. 10.1598/RRQ.31.1.5 · DOI
  9. Laufer B., 1997, Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy, 20
  10. Lively T., 2003, Vocabulary improvement program for English language learners and their classmates
  11. MacGinitie W. H., 2000, Gates‐MacGinitie Reading Tests
  12. Nagy W., 1988, Teaching vocabulary to improve reading comprehension
  13. 10.1080/10862969009547816 · DOI
  14. 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.159 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.246 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/10862960709336758 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 65

Metadata

Authors
PROCTOR, C. P., & MO, E.
Affiliations
  • Boston College (US)
  • Center for Applied Special Technology (US)
Venue
TESOL Quarterly
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-03
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
126-136
ISSN
  • 0039-8322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7249
OpenAlex
W1907573263
Cited by
65
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • TESOL Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Boston College
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
English comprehension, Spanish-English bilingual students, second language reading, cognates, reading comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review