The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Doxorubicin Encapsulated in Liposomes Containing Surface‐Bound Polyethylene Glycol: Pharmacokinetics, Tumor Localization, and Safety in Patients with AIDS‐Related Kaposi's Sarcoma
Abstract
A study of the plasma pharmacokinetics, tumor localization, and safety of a single dose of doxorubicin encapsulated in liposomes containing surface‐bound polyethylene glycol (PEG‐liposomal doxorubicin) was conducted in patients with Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) as a manifestation of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). Eighteen patients with AIDS‐KS diagnosed by examination of biopsy specimens were randomly assigned to receive either standard doxorubicin or PEG‐liposomal doxorubicin. Consecutive participants were entered at three dose levels (10, 20, and 40 mg/m 2) in ascending fashion. Clearance of PEG‐liposomal doxorubicin was 0.034 L/h/m 2 to 0.108 L/h/m 2, volume of distribution (Vd) was 2.2 L/m 2 to 4.4 L/m 2, and half‐lives (t 1/2) of the initial decline in the plasma concentration—time curve and of the terminal decline were 3.77 hours and 41.3 hours, respectively. Seventy‐two hours after administration, doxorubicin levels observed in lesions of patients receiving PEG‐liposomal doxorubicin were 5.2 to 11.4 times greater than those found in patients given comparable doses of standard doxorubicin. PEG‐liposomal doxorubicin and standard doxorubicin were roughly equipotent in producing toxicity. Encapsulation in liposomes containing surface‐bound PEG significantly limits the distribution and elimination of doxorubicin, results in greater accumulation of the drug in KS lesions 72 hours after dosing than does standard doxorubicin, and may improve drug efficacy and therapeutic index in the treatment of AIDS‐KS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Drug Delivery Systems: Entering the Mainstream
Allen, T. M., & Cullis, P. R. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1095833 · Cited by 4,552
Why 90% of clinical drug development fails and how to improve it?
Sun, D., Gao, W., Hu, H., & Zhou, S. (2022) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2022.02.002 · Cited by 1,763
Rawat, P. S., Jaiswal, A., Khurana, A., Bhatti, J. S., & Navik, U. (2021) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111708 · Cited by 909
Nichols, J. W., & Bae, Y. H. (2014) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.03.057 · Cited by 834
The transferrin receptor and the targeted delivery of therapeutic agents against cancer
Daniels, T. R., Bernabeu, E., Rodríguez, J. A., Patel, S., Kozman, M., Chiappetta, D. A., Holler, E., Ljubimova, J. Y., Helguera, G., & Penichet, M. L. (2012) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects · doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2011.07.016 · Cited by 807
Metadata
- Authors
- Northfelt, D. W., Martin, F. J., Working, P., Volberding, P. A., Russell, J., Newman, M., Amantea, M. A., & Kaplan, L. D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-63
- ISSN
- 0021-9754 (ISSN-L)
- 0091-2700
- 1552-4604
- OpenAlex
- W1975298683
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Doxorubicin Encapsulated in Liposomes Containing Surface‐Bound Polyethylene Glycol: Pharmacokinetics, Tumor Localization, and Safety in Patients with AIDS‐Related Kaposi's Sarcoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.1552-4604.1996.tb04152.x
- The paper
- Northfelt, D. W., Martin, F. J., Working, P., Volberding, P. A., Russell, J., Newman, M., Amantea, M. A., & Kaplan, L. D. (1996). Doxorubicin Encapsulated in Liposomes Containing Surface‐Bound Polyethylene Glycol: Pharmacokinetics, Tumor Localization, and Safety in Patients with AIDS‐Related Kaposi's Sarcoma. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1552-4604.1996.tb04152.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.