The DOI matches its Crossref record.
AmBisome (Liposomal Amphotericin B): A Comparative Review
Abstract
AmBisome (NeXstar Pharmaceuticals, San Dimas, CA) is a unilamellar liposomal formulation of amphotericin B that was recently approved for use as empirical treatment for presumed fungal infections in febrile neutropenic patients and for aspergillosis, candidiasis, and cryptococcosis infections refractory to amphotericin B. It is a small closed microscopic sphere (<100 nm in diameter) with an inner aqueous core (i.e., a true liposome). AmBisome remains as an intact sphere in vitro and for prolonged periods of time in vivo during the processes of systemic transport and pharmacologic action. As a consequence of its size and in vivo stability, AmBisome has physiochemical properties and a pharmacokinetic profile that are considerably different from those of currently available lipid‐complexed amphotericin B formulations, with greatly increased area under the plasma concentration—time curve and much lower clearance at equivalent doses. AmBisome liposomes can be seen to accumulate at sites of fungal infection. Disruption of AmBisome liposomes occurs after attachment to the fungal cell wall and results in amphotericin B binding to fungal cell membrane ergosterol with subsequent cell lysis. AmBisome has been shown to penetrate the cell wall of both extracellular and intracellular forms of susceptible fungi.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Anselmo, A. C., & Mitragotri, S. (2016) · Bioengineering & Translational Medicine · doi:10.1002/btm2.10003 · Cited by 1,321
Amphotericin B formulations: a comparative review of efficacy and toxicity
Hamill, R. J. (2013) · Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40265-013-0069-4 · Cited by 807
Wingard, J. R., White, M. H., Anaissie, E., Raffalli, J., Goodman, J., Arrieta, A., & L Amph/ABLC Collaborative Study Group (2000) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/317451 · Cited by 527
Mortality and Costs of Acute Renal Failure Associated with Amphotericin B Therapy
Bates, D. W., Su, L., Yu, D. T., Chertow, G. M., Seger, D. L., Gomes, D. R. J., Dasbach, E. J., & Platt, R. (2001) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/319211 · Cited by 451
Amphotericin B: time for a new “gold standard”
Saravolatz, L. D., Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., Marr, K. A., Rex, J. H., & Cohen, S. H. (2003) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/376634 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Boswell, G. W., Buell, D., & Bekersky, I.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-07
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 583-592
- ISSN
- 0021-9754 (ISSN-L)
- 0091-2700
- 1552-4604
- OpenAlex
- W2119487986
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AmBisome (Liposomal Amphotericin B): A Comparative Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.1552-4604.1998.tb04464.x
- The paper
- Boswell, G. W., Buell, D., & Bekersky, I. (1998). AmBisome (Liposomal Amphotericin B): A Comparative Review. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1552-4604.1998.tb04464.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.