Cited by 17Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesPacific and Southeast Asian StudiesPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

Culturally modified human remains recovered from an earth‐oven interment on Waya Island, Fiji

Open access
Cochrane, Ethan E., Pietrusewsky, Michael, Douglas, Michele T.·2004·Archaeology in Oceania

Abstract

The incomplete skeletal remains of a young adolescent (10–12 years of age) were recovered from the uppermost layer of an earth‐oven at the Qaranicagi Site (Y2‐39), Waya Island, Fiji. Analysis of the remains revealed minimal fire or heat alteration. Cut marks are distributed across several elements and suggest at least partial butchering of the individual.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.1834-4453.2004.tb00559.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Further human remains were uncovered in midden deposits from TU 1 and TU 3 at Qaranicagi.

    “Further human remains were uncovered in midden deposits from the two test units TU 1 and TU 3.”

    From The Archaeology of Cannibalism: a Review of the Taphonomic Traits Associated with Survival and Ritualistic Cannibalism (2025) · cites this paper as Cochrane et al., 2004

    The paper reports human bone fragments in test unit 1, consistent with the claim about further remains at Qaranicagi. It also reports human remains in test unit 3, but places those remains in an earth-oven feature, not midden deposits (passages labeled Abstract; page unavailable). The Discussion distinguishes the earth-oven remains from the site's human midden remains. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • An earth-oven feature containing human remains was uncovered in TU 3 at Qaranicagi cave (Y2-39) on Waya Island.

    “An earth-oven feature containing human remains was uncovered in TU 3.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Best, S. B. 1984 Lakeba: The Prehistory of a Fijian Island. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Auckland.
  2. Cochrane, E. E. 2002 Explaining the Prehistory of Ceramic Technology on Waya Island, Fiji. Archaeology in Oceania 37(1):37-50. In press, Archaeological Investigations on Waya Island: the 2001 University of Hawai'i Archaeological Field School. Domodomo 16. DeGusta, D. 1999 Fijian Cannibalism: Osteological Evidence from Navatu. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 1l0:215-241. Archaeol. Oceania 39 (2004) 59-60
  3. Somers St, Lawson NSW 2783. 2000 Fijian Cannibalism and Mortuary Ritual: Bioarchaeo- logical Evidence from Vuda. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 10:76-92.
  4. Hunt, T. L., K. A. Aronson, E. E. Cochrane, J. S. Field, L. Humphrey and T. M. Rieth 1999 A Preliminary Report on Archaeological Research in the Yasawa Islands, Fiji. Domodomo 12(2):5-43.
  5. Rechtman, R. B. 1992 The Evolution of Sociopolitical Complexity in the Fiji Islands. PhD dissertation, The University of California, Los Angeles.
  6. Rieth, T. M. 1998 Early Evidence for Fijian Cannibalism?: Refining the Methods for Identifying Cannibalism in the Archaeological Record. Undergraduate Honors Thesis, University of Hawai'i.
  7. Saunders, S. R. 1992 Sudadult Skeletons and Growth Related Studies. In Skeletal Biology of Past Peoples: Research Methods, edited by S. R. Saunders and M. A. Katzenberg, pp. 1-20. Wiley-Liss, New York.
  8. Scheuer, L. and S. Black 2000 Developmental Juvenile Osteology. Academic Press, San Diego.
  9. Spennemann, D. H. R. 1987 Cannibalism in Fiji: The Analysis of Butchering Marks on Human Bones and the Historical Record. Domodomo 5(2):29-46.
  10. Stuiver, M., P. J. Reimer, E. Bard, W. J. Beck, G. S. Burr, K. A. Hughen, B. Kromer, G, McCormac, J. van der Plicht and M. Spurk 1998 INTCAL98 Radiocarbon Age Calibration, 24,000-0 cal BP. Radiocarbon 40(3):1041-1084.
  11. White, T. D. 1992 Prehistoric Cannibalism at Mancos 5MTUMR-2346. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cochrane, E. E., Pietrusewsky, M., & Douglas, M. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • 4020 Edgehill Road Fort Worth TX 76116 USA
Venue
Archaeology in Oceania
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-04
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
54-59
ISSN
  • 0003-8121 (ISSN-L)
  • 0728-4896
  • 1834-4453
OpenAlex
W2064792146
Cited by
17
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
15.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archaeology in Oceania/Archæology & physical anthropology in Oceania (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Texas Christian University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Keywords
cut marks, butchery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review