The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dual DNA Staining Assessment of Bovine Sperm Viability Using SYBR‐14 and Propidium Iodide
Open accessAbstract
ABSTRACT: A new membrane‐permeant DNA stain, SYBR‐14, was used in combination with propidium iodide (PI) to estimate the proportion of living sperm in bovine semen. The SYBR‐14 stained living sperm while PI only stained degenerate cells that had lost their membrane integrity. Staining with SYBR‐14 resulted in the nuclei of living sperm fluorescing bright green. Aliquots containing nearly all living bovine sperm were prepared using glass wool/Sephadex filtration to remove dead and damaged cells. A portion of this filtered sample was killed by unprotected freeze‐thawing and used to provide mixed aliquots containing known ratios of living and dead sperm. Flow cytometry was used to assess the green and red fluorescence of these mixtures. The percentages of living sperm, as determined by the log of green fluorescence, were 85.1, 68.8, 39.8, 20.7, and 1.4 for ratios of 100:0,75:25,50:50,25:75, and 0:100 of the filtered, killed mixtures. Also, bovine semen was diluted 1:60 in HEPES‐0.1% bovine serum albumin and incubated for 0,3,6, and 24 hours at 36°C to assess changes in cell viability. As ceN death occurred during this incubation period, a relatively rapid transition of staining from green to red occurred as sperm died. Three replicates of cryopreserved sperm from six bulls were also examined using SYBR‐14 and PI to assess the proportion of living and dead cells. Flow cytometric analyses of these samples, which had been processed and stored in homogenized milk, indicated that this stain combination was useful in assessing the quality of cryopreserved sperm. The combination of SYBR‐14 and PI was determined to be an effective tool for assessing the viability of fresh or cryopreserved sperm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anderson, S., de Bruijn, M. H. L., Coulson, A. R., Eperon, I. C., Sanger, F., & Young, I. G. (1982) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(82)90137-1 · Cited by 1,472
Cited by
Bacterial viability and antibiotic susceptibility testing with SYTOX green nucleic acid stain
Roth, B. L., Poot, M., Yue, S. T., & Millard, P. J. (1997) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.63.6.2421-2431.1997 · Cited by 579
Self-citationSurfactants as microbicides and contraceptive agents: a systematic in vitro study
Vieira, O. V., Hartmann, D. O., Cardoso, C. M. P., Oberdoerfer, D., Baptista, M., Santos, M. A. S., Almeida, L., Ramalho-Santos, J., & Vaz, W. L. C. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002913 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- GARNER, D. L., JOHNSON, L. A., YUE, S. T., ROTH, B. L., & HAUGLAND, R. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Andrology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-11-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 620-629
- ISSN
- 0196-3635 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-4640
- OpenAlex
- W1501091531
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dual DNA Staining Assessment of Bovine Sperm Viability Using SYBR‐14 and Propidium Iodide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.1939-4640.1994.tb00510.x
- The paper
- GARNER, D. L., JOHNSON, L. A., YUE, S. T., ROTH, B. L., & HAUGLAND, R. P. (1994). Dual DNA Staining Assessment of Bovine Sperm Viability Using SYBR‐14 and Propidium Iodide. Journal of Andrology. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.1994.tb00510.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.