Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 263

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 152 of the 152 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

WPA guidance on how to combat stigmatization of psychiatry and psychiatrists

Open access
SARTORIUS, NORMAN, GAEBEL, WOLFGANG, CLEVELAND, HELEN-ROSE, STUART, HEATHER, AKIYAMA, TSUYOSHI, ARBOLEDA-FLÓREZ, JULIO, BAUMANN, ANJA E., GUREJE, OYE, JORGE, MIGUEL R., KASTRUP, MARIANNE, SUZUKI, YURIKO, TASMAN, ALLAN·2010·World Psychiatry

Abstract

In 2009 the WPA President established a Task Force that was to examine available evidence about the stigmatization of psychiatry and psychiatrists and to make recommendations about action that national psychiatric societies and psychiatrists as professionals could do to reduce or prevent the stigmatization of their discipline as well as to prevent its nefarious consequences. This paper presents a summary of the Task Force's findings and recommendations. The Task Force reviewed the literature concerning the image of psychiatry and psychiatrists in the media and the opinions about psychiatry and psychiatrists of the general public, of students of medicine, of health professionals other than psychiatrists and of persons with mental illness and their families. It also reviewed the evidence about the interventions that have been undertaken to combat stigma and consequent discrimination and made a series of recommendations to the national psychiatric societies and to individual psychiatrists. The Task Force laid emphasis on the formulation of best practices of psychiatry and their application in health services and on the revision of curricula for the training of health personnel. It also recommended that national psychiatric societies establish links with other professional associations, with organizations of patients and their relatives and with the media in order to approach the problems of stigma on a broad front. The Task Force also underlined the role that psychiatrists can play in the prevention of stigmatization of psychiatry, stressing the need to develop a respectful relationship with patients, to strictly observe ethical rules in the practice of psychiatry and to maintain professional competence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00296.x

Cites

152 of 152 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 152 references

Cited by

See all 263

Metadata

Authors
SARTORIUS, N., GAEBEL, W., CLEVELAND, H.-R., STUART, H., AKIYAMA, T., ARBOLEDA-FLÓREZ, J., BAUMANN, A. E., GUREJE, O., JORGE, M. R., KASTRUP, M., SUZUKI, Y., & TASMAN, A.
Venue
World Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
131-144
ISSN
1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2141780834
Cited by
263
References
152
FWCI
23.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: WPA guidance on how to combat stigmatization of psychiatry and psychiatrists. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00296.x
The paper
SARTORIUS, N., GAEBEL, W., CLEVELAND, H.-R., STUART, H., AKIYAMA, T., ARBOLEDA-FLÓREZ, J., BAUMANN, A. E., GUREJE, O., JORGE, M. R., KASTRUP, M., SUZUKI, Y., & TASMAN, A. (2010). WPA guidance on how to combat stigmatization of psychiatry and psychiatrists. World Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00296.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.