The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scoring Concept Maps: An Integrated Rubric for Assessing Engineering Education
Abstract
We investigated the use of concept maps to assess “knowledge integration,” by developing a rubric to “score” maps using two samples of students. In 2000, a sample of sophomore, junior and senior industrial engineering students was asked to develop concept maps of that field. This exercise was repeated in 2002 with seniors, half of whom participated as sophomores. The maps were scored using “traditional” counting metrics proposed by other researchers and with a holistic approach developed for the study. The holistic approach indicated that students improved as they matriculated through the program, and also enabled faculty to identify programmatic weaknesses. Although the “traditional” methods provided quantifiable information, closer examination questioned whether that information was representative of students' true conceptual understanding. Consequently, a scoring rubric was developed and tested using attributes of the holistic approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B., & Kahle, J. B. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173469 · Cited by 5,199
Cited by
Singer, S., & Smith, K. A. (2013) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20030 · Cited by 835
Framing Experience: Concept Maps, Mind Maps, and Data Collection in Qualitative Research
Wheeldon, J., & Faubert, J. (2009) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940690900800307 · Cited by 347
Panadero, E., Romero, M., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2013) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.005 · Cited by 195
Metadata
- Authors
- Besterfield‐Sacre, M., Gerchak, J., Lyons, M. R., Shuman, L. J., & Wolfe, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 105-115
- ISSN
- 1069-4730 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-9830
- OpenAlex
- W2050096705
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scoring Concept Maps: An Integrated Rubric for Assessing Engineering Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00795.x
- The paper
- Besterfield‐Sacre, M., Gerchak, J., Lyons, M. R., Shuman, L. J., & Wolfe, H. (2004). Scoring Concept Maps: An Integrated Rubric for Assessing Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00795.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.