The impact of a rubric and friendship on peer assessment: Effects on construct validity, performance, and perceptions of fairness and comfort
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A strong friendship tends to inflate over-scoring in peer assessment.
“Previous research also has shown that a strong friendship tends to inflate over-scoring in peer assessment (Panadero et al., 2013).”
From Does anonymity matter? Examining quality of online peer assessment and students' attitudes (2020) · cites this paper as Panadero et al., 2013
Peer assessment has been shown to be more accurate when rubrics are utilised.
“Peer assessment has also been shown to be more accurate when rubrics are utilised.”
From The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies (2020) · cites this paper as Panadero, Romero, & Strijbos (2013)
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,588 · see citing works
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,888 · see citing works
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,406 · see citing works
Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams
Edmondson, A. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666999 · Cited by 12,026 · see citing works
The Content Analysis Guidebook
Neuendorf, K. A. (2017) · doi:10.4135/9781071802878 · Cited by 9,286 · see citing works
Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data
Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312450709336664 · Cited by 4,225 · see citing works
Messick, S. (1995) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.50.9.741 · Cited by 4,198 · see citing works
Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities
Topping, K. (1998) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170598 · Cited by 2,173 · see citing works
The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences
Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002 · Cited by 1,509 · see citing works
Barron, B. (2003) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1203_1 · Cited by 1,446 · see citing works
The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079912331379935 · Cited by 1,206 · see citing works
Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks
Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543070003287 · Cited by 1,170 · see citing works
Boud, D. J., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0260293990240405 · Cited by 1,035 · see citing works
Learning With Concept and Knowledge Maps: A Meta-Analysis
Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543076003413 · Cited by 932 · see citing works
The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review
Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002 · Cited by 839 · see citing works
Self-citationCurrent Concerns in Validity Theory
Kane, M. T. (2001) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2001.tb01130.x · Cited by 753 · see citing works
Handbook of Formative Assessment
Andrade, H. (2010) · doi:10.4324/9780203874851 · Cited by 663 · see citing works
Jehn, K. A., & Shah, P. P. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.775 · Cited by 561 · see citing works
Promoting Learning and Achievement Through Self-Assessment
Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405840802577544 · Cited by 558 · see citing works
Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions
van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
The Impact of Self- and Peer-Grading on Student Learning
Sadler, P., & Good, E. (2006) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15326977ea1101_1 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The students' views
Hanrahan, S. J., & Isaacs, G. (2001) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360123776 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
Falchikov, N. (2005) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Self and Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity and Utility
Topping, K. J. (2006) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-48125-1_4 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Wilson, R. W. (2006) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.891 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K., & Mylonas, A. (2002) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0260293022000009302 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Brown, S. A. (1997) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/s0191-491x(97)86215-3 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning
Jones, A. C., & Issroff, K. (2004) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.004 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course
Tseng, S.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.007 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Hafner, J., & Hafner, P. (2003) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/0950069022000038268 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Panadero, E., Tapia, J. A., & Martínez, J. A. H. (2012) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.007 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Self-citationUnravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments
Strijbos, J.-W., & Sluijsmans, D. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.002 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Self-citationHaving second thoughts: Student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise
Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (1997) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079712331381064 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2009) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2008.11.002 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Social effects of collaborative learning in primary schools
Tolmie, A. K., Topping, K. J., Christie, D., Donaldson, C., Howe, C. J., Jessiman, E., Livingston, K., & Thurston, A. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.01.005 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Scoring Concept Maps: An Integrated Rubric for Assessing Engineering Education
Besterfield‐Sacre, M., Gerchak, J., Lyons, M. R., Shuman, L. J., & Wolfe, H. E. (2004) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00795.x · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Toth, E. E., Suthers, D. D., & Lesgold, A. M. (2002) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.10004 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (2013) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.008 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
(2010) · OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut) · doi:10.4324/9780203874851-12 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Shavelson, R. J., Ruiz‐Primo, M. A., & Wiley, E. W. (2005) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-004-9448-9 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Improving the Quality of Undergraduate Peer Assessment: A Case for Student and Staff Development
Smith, H., Cooper, A., & Lancaster, L. (2002) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/13558000110102904 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Peer Assessment in Problem-Based Learning: A Qualitative Study
Papinczak, T., Young, L., & Groves, M. (2006) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-005-5046-6 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
The Development and Maintenance of Friendship
Hays, R. B. (1984) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407584011005 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Involving Students in Assessment
Falchikov, N. (2004) · Psychology Learning & Teaching · doi:10.2304/plat.2003.3.2.102 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Brown, G., Glasswell, K., & Harland, D. (2004) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2004.07.001 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
The impact of stress in self‐ and peer assessment
Pope, N. K. (2004) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0260293042003243896 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Self-, peer- and teacher-assessment of student essays
Lindblom‐Ylänne, S., Pihlajamäki, H., & Kotkas, T. (2006) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787406061148 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Panadero, E., Alonso‐Tapia, J., & Urbano, E. R. (2013) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.04.001 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citationLearning how to use a computer-based concept-mapping tool: Self-explaining examples helps
Hilbert, T. S., & Renkl, A. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.006 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Reciprocity as a Source of Bias in Multiple Peer Assessment of Group Work
Magin, D. (2001) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070020030715 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Tsai, C.-C., & Liang, J.-C. (2009) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-007-9047-0 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Creativity and Music Education: The Impact of Social Variables
MacDonald, R., & Miell, D. (2000) · International Journal of Music Education · doi:10.1177/025576140003600107 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
An Assessment of Reliability and Validity of a Rubric for Grading APA-Style Introductions
Stellmack, M. A., Konheim‐Kalkstein, Y. L., Manor, J. E., Massey, A. R., & Schmitz, J. (2009) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00986280902739776 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Pope, N. K. (2001) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930120052396 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Keeping and Ending Casual, Close and Best Friendships
Rose, S. M., & Serafica, F. C. (1986) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407586033002 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Concept Maps as an Assessment Tool in Psychology Courses
Jacobs‐Lawson, J. M., & Hershey, D. A. (2002) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15328023top2901_06 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Panadero, E., Alonso‐Tapia, J., & Martínez, J. A. H. (2014) · Journal for the Study of Education and Development Infancia y Aprendizaje · doi:10.1080/02103702.2014.881655 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Self-citationImproving Learning through Interventions of Student-Generated Questions and Concept Maps
Berry, J. W., & Chew, S. L. (2008) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00986280802373841 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Friendship and collaborative creative writing in the primary classroom
Vass, É. (2002) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00216.x · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Strijbos, J.-W., Ochoa, T. A., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2009) · Cognitive and Emotional Processes in Web-Based Education · doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-392-0.ch018 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationUsing student feedback to construct an assessment rubric for a concept map in physiology
Moni, R. W., Beswick, E., & Moni, K. (2005) · AJP Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00066.2004 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Learning to assess students using peer review
Pond, K., & ul‐Haq, R. (1997) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/s0191-491x(97)86214-1 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Anonymity in classroom voting and debating
Ainsworth, S., Gelmini-Hornsby, G., Threapleton, K., Crook, C., O’Malley, C., & Buda, M. (2011) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.05.001 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Mourlas, C., Tsianos, N., & Germanakos, P. (2009) · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Student perceptions and use of an assessment rubric for a group concept map in physiology
Moni, R. W., & Moni, K. (2008) · AJP Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00030.2007 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Optimising new modes of assessment: in search of qualities and standards
Schuwirth, L. (2004) · Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs · doi:10.1007/bf03056663 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
ASSESSING THE ASSESSORS: ADDED VALUE IN WEB-BASED MULTI-CYCLE PEER ASSESSMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION
Kali, Y., & Ronen, M. (2008) · Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.1142/s1793206808000434 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
An Evaluation of Teacher Trainees' Opinions of the Peer Assessment in Terms of Some Variables
Karaca, E. (2009) · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Students’ Peer Evaluation Calibration Through The Administration Of Vignettes
Wang, J., & Imbrie, P. K. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--16755 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies
Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3 · Cited by 446 · see citing works
The future of student self-assessment: a review of known unknowns and potential directions.
Panadero, E., Brown, G. T. L., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2016) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Self-citationPanadero, E., & Roméro, M. (2014) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2013.877872 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Self-citationPanadero, E., & Alqassab, M. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1600186 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Self-citationPeer assessment in the digital age: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher ratings
Li, H., Xiong, Y., Zang, X., Kornhaber, M. L., Lyu, Y., Chung, K. S., & Suen, H. K. (2015) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.999746 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Noroozi, O., Kirschner, P. A., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2017) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9400-z · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E. (2021) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13054 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Panadero, E., Jönsson, A., Pinedo, L., & Fernández‐Castilla, B. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09823-4 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Self-citationRotsaert, T., Panadero, E., & Schellens, T. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0339-8 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Self-citationYan, Z., Lao, H., Panadero, E., Fernández‐Castilla, B., Yang, L., & Yang, M. (2022) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100484 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Self-citationLin, G.-Y. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.010 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation
Laveault, D., Allal, L., & Publishing, S. I. (2016) · The enabling power of assessment · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Teachers’ reasons for using peer assessment: positive experience predicts use
Panadero, E., & Brown, G. T. L. (2017) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-015-0282-5 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Self-citationWhat if pupils can assess their peers anonymously? A quasi-experimental study
Vanderhoven, E., Raes, A., Montrieux, H., Rotsaert, T., & Schellens, T. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.001 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J.-W., & Ufer, S. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0342-0 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Self-citationRasooli, A., Zandi, H., & DeLuca, C. (2018) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.12.008 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
The Reliability and Validity of Peer Review of Writing in High School AP English Classes.
Schunn, C. D., Godley, A., & Martino, S. D. (2016) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.525 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
How Accurate Are Our Students? A Meta-analytic Systematic Review on Self-assessment Scoring Accuracy
León, S. P., Panadero, E., & García‐Martínez, I. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09819-0 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Self-citationA systematic review on peer assessment: intrapersonal and interpersonal factors
Panadero, E., Alqassab, M., Fernández Ruiz, J., & Ocampo, J. C. (2023) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2023.2164884 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationGielen, M., & Wever, B. D. (2015) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12096 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Structural validity and invariance of the Feedback Perceptions Questionnaire
Strijbos, J.-W., Pat‐El, R., & Narciss, S. (2021) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100980 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationAlt, D., & Raichel, N. (2020) · Research Papers in Education · doi:10.1080/02671522.2020.1849371 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
¿Cómo emplear las rúbricas para implementar una verdadera evaluación formativa?
Fraile, J., Pardo, R., & Panadero, E. (2017) · Revista Complutense de Educación · doi:10.5209/rced.51915 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationHarris, L. R., Brown, G., & Harnett, J. A. (2014) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2014.976541 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
A framework for designing, implementing, communicating and researching peer assessment
Adachi, C., Tai, J., & Dawson, P. (2017) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1405913 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Dijks, M. A., Brummer, L., & Kostons, D. D. N. M. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1447645 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
A plan for the co-construction and collaborative use of rubrics for student learning
Kilgour, P. W., Northcote, M. T., Williams, A. P., & Kilgour, A. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1614523 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Peer assessment as a learning and self-assessment tool: a look inside the black box
Stančić, M. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1828267 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
The development of secondary students' feedback literacy: peer assessment as an intervention
Ketonen, L., Nieminen, P., & Hähkiöniemi, M. (2020) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2020.1835794 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
“Incomprehension in this area may result in unproductive practices, such as the provision of superficial positive feedback (Tasker & Herrenkohl, 2016) or friendship marking (Foley, 2013; Panadero et al., 2013), which occurs when students let social relationships affect the feedback they provide.”
BackgroundStudents’ perceptions of peer assessment effectiveness: an explorative study
Sridharan, B., Muttakin, M. B., & Mihret, D. G. (2018) · Accounting Education · doi:10.1080/09639284.2018.1476894 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Use of WhatsApp in Higher Education
Güler, Ç. (2016) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633116667359 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Alt, D., & Naamati-Schneider, L. (2021) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02542-w · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Rico-Juan, J. R., Gallego, A. J., & Calvo-Zaragoza, J. (2019) · Comput. Educ. · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103609 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., Estrada, E., & Schellens, T. (2017) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.02.003 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationZhang, F., Schunn, C. D., & Baikadi, A. (2017) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-017-9420-6
van Heerden, M., & Bharuthram, S. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1863910 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Liu, J., Johnson, R. L., & Fan, X. (2016) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.01.002 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Changes in the reliability and validity of peer assessment across the college years
Zhang, F., Schunn, C. D., Li, W.-T., & Long, M. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1724260 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., Schellens, T., & Raes, A. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0329-x · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationEnhanced Peer Assessment in MOOC Evaluation Through Assignment and Review Analysis
Alcarria, R., Bordel, B., de Andrés, D. M., & Robles, T. (2018) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v13i01.7461 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Serrano-Aguilera, J. J., Tocino, A., Fortes, S., Martín, C., Melé, P. M., Moreno-Sáez, R., Muñoz, A., Palomo-Hierro, S., & Torres, A. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11020071 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
The Effect of Peer Assessment on Non-Cognitive Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis
Li, H., Bialo, J. A., Xiong, Y., Hunter, C. V., & Guo, X. (2021) · Applied Measurement in Education · doi:10.1080/08957347.2021.1933980 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Providing Formative Peer Feedback
Panadero, E., Jönsson, A., & Alqassab, M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316832134.020 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationBerrocoso, J. V., & Gómez, A. C. (2014) · REDU Revista de Docencia Universitaria · doi:10.4995/redu.2014.6415 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Hung, Y.-J., Samuelson, B. L., & Chen, S.-C. (2015) · Educational linguistics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22422-0_13 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Wang, X.-M., Huang, X.-T., Han, Y.-H., & Hu, Q.-N. (2024) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101548 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Fairness in Classroom Assessment: A Systematic Review
Baniasadi, A., صالحی, ک., Khodaie, E., Noaparast, K. B., & Izanloo, B. (2022) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-021-00636-z · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Strijbos, J.-W., & Wichmann, A. (2017) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0353-x · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationUso de rúbricas en educación superior y evaluación de competencias
Martínez, L. C. V., & Hurtado, J. C. T. (2018) · Profesorado Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado · doi:10.30827/profesorado.v22i3.7998 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Peer assessment as a method for facilitating cross-sector learning: A national pilot
Clymer, F., & Gibson, D. (2022) · Pharmacy Education · doi:10.46542/pe.2022.221.595608 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Morton, J. K., Northcote, M. T., Kilgour, P. W., & Jackson, W. (2021) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.18.4.9 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Does anonymity matter? Examining quality of online peer assessment and students' attitudes
Kobayashi, M. (2020) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.4694 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“Students with a higher level of friendship with the assessors still tended to over-score significantly more than those with a lower level friendship (Panadero et al., 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialDomínguez, C., Jaime, A., Sánchez, A., Blanco, J. M., & Heras, J. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.061 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Ramon-Casas, M., Nuño, N., Pons, F., & Cunillera, T. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1525337 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Li, W., & Zhang, F. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612088 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Optimal feedback structure and interactional pattern in formative peer practices: Students' beliefs
Ghahari, S., & Sedaghat, M. (2018) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2018.02.003 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Yu, F., & Sung, S. (2015) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2015.1041405 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Dmoshinskaia, N., Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2020) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-020-09884-y · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Kasch, J., van Rosmalen, P., Henderikx, M., & Kalz, M. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1893650 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Rasooli, A., Zandi, H., & DeLuca, C. (2022) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/2372966x.2021.2000843 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Vattøy, K.-D., & Gamlem, S. M. (2024) · Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00313831.2023.2192772 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Anker-Hansen, J., & Andrée, M. (2019) · Research in Science & Technological Education · doi:10.1080/02635143.2018.1557628 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Alt, D., Weinberger, A., Heinrichs, K., & Naamati-Schneider, L. (2022) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-02613-7 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Pang, T. Y., Kootsookos, A., Fox, K. E., & Pirogova, E. (2022) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.19.3.03 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Triangulation of language assessment modes: learning benefits and socio-cognitive prospects
Ghahari, S., & Farokhnia, F. (2017) · Pedagogies An International Journal · doi:10.1080/1554480x.2017.1342540 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Ocampo, J. C. G., Panadero, E., & Díez, F. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2130167 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationComputer supported novice group critique
Easterday, M. W., Lewis, D. R., Fitzpatrick, C., & Gerber, E. M. (2014) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/2598510.2600889 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis
Hornstein, J., Keller, M. V., Greisel, M., Dresel, M., & Kollar, I. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10017-3 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Davidesco, I., & Milne, C. E. (2019) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.18-12-0240 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Daou, D., Sabra, R., & Zgheib, N. K. (2020) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-020-00980-7 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Cachero, C., Rico-Juan, J. R., & Macià, H. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119150 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Noroozi, O., & Wever, B. D. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Schee, B. A. V., & Birrittella, T. D. (2021) · Marketing Education Review · doi:10.1080/10528008.2021.1887746 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Gunning, T. K., Conlan, X. A., Collins, P. K., Bellgrove, A., Antlej, K., Cardilini, A. P. A., & Fraser, C. L. (2022) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-022-00340-y · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Ackermans, K., Rusman, E., Nadolski, R. J., Specht, M. M., & Brand‐Gruwel, S. (2021) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12525 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102210 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
FOPA-MC: fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making for peer assessment
Capuano, N., Caballé, S., Percannella, G., & Ritrovato, P. (2020) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-020-05155-5 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Peer vs. Self-Grading of Practice Exams: Which Is Better?
Jackson, M. A., Tran, A., Wenderoth, M., & Doherty, J. H. (2018) · CBE - Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.18-04-0052 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Rico-Juan, J. R., Cachero, C., & Macià, H. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1955090 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., & Schellens, T. (2018) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.001 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationPanadero, E., García-Pérez, D., Ruiz, J. F., Fraile, J., Sánchez‐Iglesias, I., & Brown, G. (2023) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2023.2254015 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationAn investigation of the reliability and validity of peer, self-, and teacher assessment
Salehi, M., & Masoule, Z. S. (2017) · Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies · doi:10.2989/16073614.2016.1267577 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Li, H., Zhao, C., Long, T., Huang, Y. C., & Shu, F. (2021) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13143 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Effects of rubric quality on marker variation in higher education
Chakraborty, S., Dann, C. E., Mandal, A., Dann, B., Paul, M., & Hafeez‐Baig, A. (2021) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100997 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Xiong, Y., Schunn, C. D., & Wu, Y. (2023) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12861 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Rasooli, A., Turner, J., Varga‐Atkins, T., Pitt, E., Asgari, S., & Moindrot, W. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2354510 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Tandiono, R., & Limijaya, A. (2025) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-024-00967-7 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
The Four Pillars of Peer Assessment for Collaborative Teamwork in Higher Education
Sridharan, B., McKay, J., & Boud, D. J. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2_1 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Alt, D., & Naamati-Schneider, L. (2021) · Health Education · doi:10.1108/he-12-2020-0125 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Bias in student evaluations: Are my peers out to get me?
McMillan, A. G., Solanelles, P., & Rogers, B. L. (2021) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101032 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Yu, F., Liu, Y.-H., & Liu, K. (2023) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101279 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Do Teamwork Guidelines Improve Peer Assessment Accuracy or Attitudes During Collaborative Learning?
Lu, M., & Chiu, M. M. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Education · doi:10.1109/te.2021.3130242 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Análisis de validez en la evaluación entre iguales: un estudio en educación superior
Pascual-Gómez, I., Lorenzo-Llamas, E. M., & Monge-López, C. (2015) · RELIEVE - Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa · doi:10.7203/relieve.21.1.5168 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Lin, Z., Yan, H., & Zhao, L. (2024) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12970 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
The impact of peer assessment design on interpersonal processes: A systematic review
Senden, M., & Coertjens, L. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101405 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Portal and Gatekeeper: How Peer Feedback Functions in a High School Writing Class
Marsh, V. L. (2018) · Research in the Teaching of English · doi:10.58680/rte201829865 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Modeling Student Evaluations of Writing and Authors as a Function of Writing Errors
Roscoe, R. D., Wilson, J., Patchan, M. M., Chen, D., & Johnson, A. C. (2020) · Journal of language and Education · doi:10.17323/jle.2020.10316 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Promoting equitable achievement in STEM: lab report writing and online peer review
Culver, K. C., Bowman, N. A., Youngerman, E., Jang, N., & Just, C. L. (2020) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2020.1799315 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Meijer, H., Brouwer, J., Hoekstra, R., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2022) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/10464964221095545 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationCan Students Review Their Peers?
Pirttinen, N., & Leinonen, J. (2022) · ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE) · doi:10.1145/3502718.3524762 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Panadero, E., Romero, M., & Strijbos, J.-W.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Panadero, Ernesto
- Venue
- Studies in Educational Evaluation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 195-203
- ISSN
- 0191-491X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989213880
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 38.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Studies In Educational Evaluation (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- peer assessment, assessment rubrics, construct validity, concept maps, peer feedback, perceived fairness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
