The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conceptualizing Engagement: Contributions of Faculty to Student Engagement in Engineering
Abstract
The concept of student engagement, now prominent in the engineering education and higher education communities, has a long intellectual history. Yet only recently has attention focused on the role that faculty play as designers of educational environments to support student engagement. Drawing from examples and data from the Engineering Change study (which evaluated the impact of the new EC2000 accreditation standards on engineering programs and student learning), the Academic Pathways Study of the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education, and studies underway at the United States Air Force Academy, we explore the role of faculty, as the institutional agents who are most proximal to the student experience, in developing, facilitating, and sustaining high levels of student engagement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Validity and reliability of the Experience-Sampling Method
CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M., & LARSON, R. (1987) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-198709000-00004 · Cited by 2,544
Classroom Applications of Research on Self-Regulated Learning
Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3602_4 · Cited by 1,343
Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory
Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Shneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003) · School Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1521/scpq.18.2.158.21860 · Cited by 1,237
Does Training on Self-Regulated Learning Facilitate Students' Learning With Hypermedia?
Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.523 · Cited by 859
The Effects of Student-Faculty Interaction In the 1990s
Kuh, G. D., & Hu, S. (2001) · The Review of Higher Education · doi:10.1353/rhe.2001.0005 · Cited by 774
Cited by
Persistence, Engagement, and Migration in Engineering Programs
Ohland, M. W., Sheppard, S. D., Lichtenstein, G., Eris, O., Chachra, D., & Layton, R. A. (2008) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00978.x · Cited by 555
Estrada, M., Hernandez, P. R., & Schultz, P. W. (2018) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.17-04-0066 · Cited by 507
Student retention and engagement in higher education
Tight, M. (2020) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2019.1576860 · Cited by 312
Differentiated Overt Learning Activities for Effective Instruction in Engineering Classrooms
Menekse, M., Stump, G. S., Krause, S., & Chi, M. T. H. (2013) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20021 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, H. L., Lattuca, L. R., & Hamilton, E. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 339-353
- ISSN
- 1069-4730 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-9830
- OpenAlex
- W1993723258
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 307.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conceptualizing Engagement: Contributions of Faculty to Student Engagement in Engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00983.x
- The paper
- Chen, H. L., Lattuca, L. R., & Hamilton, E. R. (2008). Conceptualizing Engagement: Contributions of Faculty to Student Engagement in Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00983.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
