The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Emergence of Engineering Education Research as an Internationally Connected Field of Inquiry
Abstract
Background: In recent years, engineering education research (EER) has emerged as an internationally connected field of inquiry through the establishment of EER conferences, interest groups within engineering education societies, Ph.D. programs, and departments and centers at universities. Improving the preparation and training of engineers through EER is critical to solving major engineering challenges in sustainability, climate change, civil infrastructure, energy, and public health. Purpose: The purpose of this article is twofold: (1) to introduce EER as a field of inquiry, and (2) to describe the U.S. and Northern and Central European approaches to EER as two examples of the diversity of approaches. Scope/Method: The article is organized around a framework from the European didaktik tradition, which focuses on answering the w‐questions of education. The major sections describe what, why, to what end, where, who, and how EER is conducted. Conclusion: Northern and Central European educational approaches focus on authentic, complex problems, while U.S. approaches emphasize empirical evidence. Additionally, disciplinary boundaries and legitimacy are more salient issues in the U.S., while the Northern and Central European Bildung philosophy integrates across disciplines toward development of the whole person. Understanding and valuing complementary perspectives is critical to growth and internationalization of EER.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
SHULMAN, L. S. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015002004 · Cited by 18,546
Advancing engineering education in P–12 classrooms
Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00985.x · Cited by 910
Cited by
Borrego, M., & Henderson, C. (2014) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20040 · Cited by 463
Self-citationQuality in Interpretive Engineering Education Research: Reflections on an Example Study
Walther, J., Sochacka, N. W., & Kellam, N. N. (2013) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20029 · Cited by 458
Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the Learning Sciences
Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (2011) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00007.x · Cited by 428
Changing Engineering Education: Views of U.S. Faculty, Chairs, and Deans
Besterfield‐Sacre, M., Cox, M. F., Borrego, M., Beddoes, K., & Zhu, J. (2014) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20043 · Cited by 170
Self-citationComputing Education Research Today
Fincher, S. A., Tenenberg, J., Dorn, B., Hundhausen, C., McCartney, R., & Murphy, L. (2019) · The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.003 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Borrego, M., & Bernhard, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-47
- ISSN
- 1069-4730 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-9830
- OpenAlex
- W2163882922
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 34.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Emergence of Engineering Education Research as an Internationally Connected Field of Inquiry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00003.x
- The paper
- Borrego, M., & Bernhard, J. (2011). The Emergence of Engineering Education Research as an Internationally Connected Field of Inquiry. Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00003.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.