The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Emerging Research Methodologies in Engineering Education Research
Abstract
Background: Methodology refers to the theoretical arguments that researchers use in order to justify their research methods and design. There is an extensive range of well established methodologies in the educational research literature of which a growing subset is beginning to be used in engineering education research. Purpose: A more explicit engagement with methodologies, particularly those that are only emerging in engineering education research, is important so that engineering education researchers can broaden the set of research questions they are able to address. Scope/Method: Seven methodologies are outlined and for each an exemplar paper is analyzed in order to demonstrate the methodology in operation and to highlight its particular contribution. The methodologies are: Case Study, Grounded Theory, Ethnography, Action Research, Phenomenography, Discourse Analysis, and Narrative Analysis. It is noted that many of the exemplar papers use some of these methodologies in combination. Conclusion: The exemplar papers show that collectively these methodologies might allow the research community to be able to better address questions around key engineering education challenges, such as students' responses to innovative pedagogies, diversity issues in engineering, and the changing requirements for engineering graduates in the twenty‐first century.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/0951839950080103 · Cited by 3,958
Chapter 3 : Identity as an Analytic Lens for Research in Education
Gee, J. P. (2000) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x025001099 · Cited by 2,727
Rethinking ‘disadvantage’ in higher education: a paradigmatic case study using narrative analysis
Marshall, D., & Case, J. (2010) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070903518386 · Cited by 74
Self-citation
Cited by
Quality in Interpretive Engineering Education Research: Reflections on an Example Study
Walther, J., Sochacka, N. W., & Kellam, N. N. (2013) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20029 · Cited by 458
Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the Learning Sciences
Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (2011) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00007.x · Cited by 428
Teaching Creativity in Engineering Courses
Daly, S. R., Mosyjowski, E. A., & Seifert, C. M. (2014) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20048 · Cited by 281
Gelles, L. A., Lord, S. M., Hoople, G. D., Chen, D. A., & Mejia, J. A. (2020) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci10110304 · Cited by 277
When Critical Ethnography Leaves the Field and Enters the Engineering Classroom: A Scoping Review
Masta, S., & Secules, S. (2021) · Studies in Engineering Education · doi:10.21061/see.26 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Case, J. M., & Light, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 186-210
- ISSN
- 1069-4730 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-9830
- OpenAlex
- W2144447430
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 79.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emerging Research Methodologies in Engineering Education Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00008.x
- The paper
- Case, J. M., & Light, G. (2011). Emerging Research Methodologies in Engineering Education Research. Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00008.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.