The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Teaching Creativity in Engineering Courses
Open accessAbstract
Background: The ability to engage in a creative process to solve a problem or to design a novel artifact is essential to engineering as a profession. Research indicates a need for curricula that enhance students' creative skills in engineering. Purpose: Our purpose was to document current practices in engineering pedagogy with regard to opportunities for students' creative growth by examining learning goals, instructional methods, and assessments focused on cognitive creative skills. Design/Method: We conducted a critical case study of engineering pedagogy at a single university with seven engineering courses where instructors stated the goal of fostering creativity. Data included instructor and student interviews, student surveys, and course materials. For qualitative analysis, we used frameworks by Treffinger, Young, Selby, and Shepardson and by Wiggins and McTighe. Results: One aspect of creativity, convergent thinking (including analysis and evaluation), was well represented in the engineering courses in our case study. However, instruction on generating ideas and openness to exploring ideas was less often evident. For many of the creative skills, especially those related to divergent thinking and idea exploration, assessments were lacking. Conclusions: An analysis of pedagogy focused on goals, instruction, and assessments in the engineering curriculum revealed opportunities for growth in students' creative skill development. Designing assessments that motivate students to improve their creative skills and to become more aware of their own creative process is a key need in engineering pedagogy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Case study research: design and methods
Phelan, S. (2011) · Evaluation & Research in Education · doi:10.1080/09500790.2011.582317 · Cited by 21,763
Five misunderstandings about case-study research
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1077800405284363 · Cited by 14,266
(1999) · Cited by 12,812
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940690600500107 · Cited by 11,829
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry
Flavell, J. H. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906 · Cited by 11,282 · cited 2×
“…Ideas – involves specific personal characteristics (e.g., Rhodes, 1961) Listening to One’s Inner Voice – also known as reflection or metacognition (e.g., Flavell, 1979; Sch€on, 1993) By breaking down creativity into its cognitive components, Treffinger et al. resolve some of the ambiguity in…”
BackgroundThe role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363 · Cited by 9,564
Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2015) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573 · Cited by 7,594
Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research
Prince, M. (2004) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x · Cited by 7,334 · cited 2×
“All of these learning activities provide an opportunity for instructors to use best practices in engineering education (e.g., Prince, 2004; Smith et al., 2005).”
Background(2011) · Cited by 7,157
Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches
Wilson, R. D., & Creswell, J. W. (1996) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3152153 · Cited by 7,080
Cited by
Robot will take your job: Innovation for an era of artificial intelligence
Rampersad, G. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.019 · Cited by 240
Taylor, C. L., Esmaili Zaghi, A., Kaufman, J. C., Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2020) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20310 · Cited by 57
Work in Progress: Assessing Creativity of Alternative Uses Task Responses: A Detailed Procedure
Alhashim, A., Marshall, M., Hartog, T., Jonczyk, R., Dickson, D., van Hell, J., Okudan-Kremer, G., & Siddique, Z. (2020) · 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings · doi:10.18260/1-2--35612 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Daly, S. R., Mosyjowski, E. A., & Seifert, C. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-06-17
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 417-449
- ISSN
- 1069-4730 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-9830
- OpenAlex
- W1655152282
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 75
- FWCI
- 392.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Teaching Creativity in Engineering Courses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jee.20048
- The paper
- Daly, S. R., Mosyjowski, E. A., & Seifert, C. M. (2014). Teaching Creativity in Engineering Courses. Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20048
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.