CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,975Evolution and Science EducationPhilosophy of Biology and Scientific ExplanationEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

D arwin's D angerous I dea

DENNETT, DANIEL C.·1995·The Sciences
DOI 10.1002/j.2326-1951.1995.tb03633.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.2326-1951.1995.tb03633.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,975

Related

Metadata

Authors
DENNETT, D. C.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
DENNETT, DANIEL C.
ORCID
DENNETT, DANIEL C.
Venue
The Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-05-06
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
34-40
ISSN
  • 0036-861X (ISSN-L)
  • 2326-1951
DOI
10.1002/j.2326-1951.1995.tb03633.x
OpenAlex
W2140361415
Cited by
1,975
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 127 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 116 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 124 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 74
FWCI
271.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 6661 d)
Locations
The Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
Charles Darwin, evolutionary theory, natural selection, history of evolutionary theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review