The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans?
Abstract
In a dynamic world, mechanisms allowing prediction of future situations can provide a selective advantage. We suggest that memory systems differ in the degree of flexibility they offer for anticipatory behavior and put forward a corresponding taxonomy of prospection. The adaptive advantage of any memory system can only lie in what it contributes for future survival. The most flexible is episodic memory, which we suggest is part of a more general faculty of mental time travel that allows us not only to go back in time, but also to foresee, plan, and shape virtually any specific future event. We review comparative studies and find that, in spite of increased research in the area, there is as yet no convincing evidence for mental time travel in nonhuman animals. We submit that mental time travel is not an encapsulated cognitive system, but instead comprises several subsidiary mechanisms. A theater metaphor serves as an analogy for the kind of mechanisms required for effective mental time travel. We propose that future research should consider these mechanisms in addition to direct evidence of future-directed action. We maintain that the emergence of mental time travel in evolution was a crucial step towards our current success.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Suddendorf and Corballis propose that mental time travel—projecting oneself into past and future—is the most flexible form of future-oriented cognition and argue there is as yet no convincing evidence for it in nonhuman animals. They outline a taxonomy of prospection and a theater metaphor of subsidiary mechanisms to guide comparative and developmental research.
Key findings
Memory systems differ in the flexibility they offer for anticipatory behavior; episodic memory/mental time travel is described as the most flexible and most recently evolved, with its primary adaptive advantage lying in future-directed action.
- Reviewing comparative studies, the authors find no convincing evidence for mental time travel in nonhuman animals; scrub jays show episodic-like memory for what/where/when/who, but such performance may depend on trace strength, innate predispositions, or specific learning rather than mental reconstruction.
- Mental time travel is not an encapsulated system but comprises subsidiary mechanisms, metaphorically a theater production with stage, playwright, actors, set, director, executive producer, and broadcaster; in humans, key components emerge around ages 3–4, and children anticipate future needs by around age 4.
- The Bischof-Köhler hypothesis proposes that nonhuman animals cannot flexibly anticipate future need or drive states different from current ones; in Mulcahy and Call’s ape study, subjects carried a suitable tool into a waiting room in 7 out of 16 trials on average, with one orangutan achieving 15 out of 16, but the authors argue association learning was not ruled out.
Methods
Theoretical review and synthesis: the paper proposes a taxonomy of memory and prospection systems and a theater metaphor for the components of mental time travel.
- It reviews comparative, developmental, and neurophysiological evidence from published studies, including scrub jays, apes, children, amnesic patients, and brain imaging.
- The main analysis is conceptual: it evaluates whether behaviors meet criteria for mental time travel by ruling out chance, innate predispositions, procedural prospection, semantic prospection, or combinations of these.
Limitations
The paper states that there is as yet no convincing evidence for mental time travel in nonhuman animals, but also that it cannot firmly conclude other animals lack the capacity; a substantial body of comparative data is required before concluding any trait is uniquely human.
- It states that phenomenological experience is private, that there is no agreement on criteria for phenomenological awareness even in humans, and that the www criterion is neither necessary nor sufficient for mental time travel.
- Evident from the text: as a theoretical review, its conclusions depend on existing studies and interpretations; several purported positive findings in animals are critiqued as confounded by learning or association, and no new experiments are presented to resolve those disputes.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 340 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given§ Michael C. Corballis · p. 1
There is as yet no convincing evidence for mental time travel in nonhuman animals.
“We review comparative studies and find that, in spite of increased research in the area, there is as yet no convincing evidence for mental time travel in nonhuman animals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 3. Mental time travel in nonhuman animals? · p. 5
Trained apes have not provided evidence of mental time travel.
“They have not provided evidence of mental time travel.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ Is mental time travel a frame-of-reference issue? · p. 18
The correlation between these competences is age-independent.
“The correlation between these competences is age-independent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bischof-Köhler 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Randy L. Buckner · p. 20
Amnesia is linked to impairments of prospection and imagination.
“Characterization of the deficits in patients with brain lesions shows that amnesia is linked to impairments of prospection and imagination (Klein et al. 2002a; Hassabis et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Klein et al. 2002a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hassabis et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Randy L. Buckner · p. 20
Recent brain imaging observations reveal that frontal and medial temporal memory systems participate in envisioning the future in ways that parallel their role in remembering the past.
“Recent empirical observations using brain imaging reveal that frontal and medial temporal memory systems participate in envisioning the future in ways that parallel their role in remembering the past (Addis et al. 2007; Okuda et al. 2003; Szpunar et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Addis et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Okuda et al. 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Szpunar et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ The continuum of 'looking forward,' and paradoxical requirements from memory · p. 18
Episodic memory is crucial for foresight, as evident from reports of loss of foresight in patients with compromised episodic memory, typically medial-temporal amnesia.
“That episodic memory is crucial for foresight is evident from reports of loss of foresight by patients with a compromised episodic memory, typically in medial-temporal amnesia (Klein et al. 2002b; Hassabis et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Klein et al. 2002b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hassabis et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Valerie A. Carr a and Indre V. Viskontas b · p. 22
Patients with hippocampal amnesia show marked impairments in imagining future events.
“Neuroimaging results are supported by reports of marked impairments in imagining future events in patients with hippocampal amnesia (Hassabis et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hassabis et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ Mental time travel in the rat: Dissociation of recall and familiarity · p. 24
Recent work in our laboratory with rats has demonstrated behaviours that resemble 'remember, know' judgements about past occasions.
“Recent work in our laboratory with rats has demonstrated behaviours that resemble 'remember, know' judgements about past occasions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Mental time travel in the rat: Dissociation of recall and familiarity · p. 24
Similar to human episodic memory, we can demonstrate a dissociation in the neural basis of recollection and familiarity in nonhumans.
“Similar to human episodic memory, we can also demonstrate a dissociation in the neural basis of recollection and familiarity in nonhumans”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ Mental time travel in the rat: Dissociation of recall and familiarity · p. 24
We have produced direct behavioural evidence of a dissociation between recall and familiarity in rats.
“Recently we have produced direct behavioural evidence (Easton et al. 2006) of this dissociation in rats”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Easton et al. 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Mental time travel in the rat: Dissociation of recall and familiarity · p. 24
This recall ability is dependent on the fornix, the main efferent of the hippocampus.
“this recall ability is dependent on the fornix, the main efferent of the hippocampus”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Easton et al. 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning§ Mental time travel in the rat: Dissociation of recall and familiarity · p. 25
We have demonstrated a dissociation between 'familiarity-like' memory and 'recall-like' memory in the rat.
“we can at least claim that we have demonstrated a dissociation between 'familiarity-like' memory and 'recall-like' memory in the rat”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ Mental time travel in the rat: Dissociation of recall and familiarity · p. 24
Intact rats were capable of answering a question equivalent to 'where was object B when you saw it in the black context?' by seeking out a hidden object in the appropriate context.
“intact rats were capable of answering a question equivalent to 'where was object B when you saw it in the black context?' by seeking out a hidden object in the appropriate context”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Mental time travel in the rat: Dissociation of recall and familiarity · p. 24
Fornix-transected rats that could not seek out the preferred object on the basis of recall showed entirely normal recognition memory of the same objects in the same trials.
“the same fornix-transected rats that could not seek out the preferred object on the basis of recall, showed entirely normal recognition memory of the same objects in the same trials of the task”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ Empirical evaluation of mental time travel · p. 33
Scrub-jays cached more of a type of food that they will not receive in a particular place the following morning than of a type they will.
“they also cached more of a type of food that they will not receive in a particular place the following morning than of a type of food that they will (Raby et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Raby et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Empirical evaluation of mental time travel · p. 33
Scrub-jays who are not hungry cache more food in a place where they are likely to experience hunger the following morning than in a place where they are not.
“scrub-jays who are not hungry cache more food in a place in which they are likely to experience hunger the following morning than in a place that they are not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Raby et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ On the constructive episodic simulation of past and future events · p. 34
Older adults, compared with younger adults, show reduced specificity both in recall of past autobiographical episodes and imaginings of possible future episodes.
“older adults, compared with younger adults, show reduced specificity both in their recall of past autobiographical episodes and their imaginings of possible future episodes (Addis et al., in press).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Addis et al., in press
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 35
Chimpanzees kept the initial cookie for at least 8 minutes in the waiting to exchange task.
“chimpanzees kept the initial cookie for at least 8 minutes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dufour et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ramseyer et al. 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 35
Chimpanzees gave up waiting earlier than predicted by their general ability to wait.
“Interestingly, chimpanzees gave up waiting earlier than predicted by their general ability to wait.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 35
Capuchin monkeys did not wait for more than 20 to 40 seconds in the waiting to exchange task.
“While capuchins did not wait for more than 20 to 40 seconds”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dufour et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ramseyer et al. 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ Michael C. Corballis · p. 1
Episodic memory is part of a more general faculty of mental time travel.
“The most flexible is episodic memory, which we suggest is part of a more general faculty of mental time travel that allows us not only to go back in time, but also to foresee, plan, and shape virtually any specific future event.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ Michael C. Corballis · p. 1
Mental time travel is not an encapsulated cognitive system, but instead comprises several subsidiary mechanisms.
“We submit that mental time travel is not an encapsulated cognitive system, but instead comprises several subsidiary mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ Michael C. Corballis · p. 1
Memory systems differ in the degree of flexibility they offer for anticipatory behavior.
“We suggest that memory systems differ in the degree of flexibility they offer for anticipatory behavior and put forward a corresponding taxonomy of prospection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Michael C. Corballis · p. 1
Episodic memory is the most flexible memory system.
“The most flexible is episodic memory, which we suggest is part of a more general faculty of mental time travel that allows us not only to go back in time, but also to foresee, plan, and shape virtually any specific future event.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 2. A taxonomy of future-oriented cognition · p. 2
Episodic memory gives rise to the notion of mental time travel.
“It is the second component of declarative memory, namely, episodic memory, that gives rise to the notion of mental time travel.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning§ 1. Introduction · p. 1
Organisms fixed to a pattern that no longer prevails are disadvantaged relative to those that have more flexibility.
“But even longterm regularities may at times change drastically (e.g., climate change), and organisms fixed to a pattern that no longer prevails are disadvantaged relative to those that have more flexibility.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 2.1. Toward a definition of mental time travel · p. 4
The primary role of mental time travel into the past is to provide raw material from which to construct and imagine possible futures.
“But we argue that the primary role of mental time travel into the past is to provide raw material from which to construct and imagine possible futures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Introduction · p. 1
Learning and memory in general may be regarded as future-oriented adaptations that allow an individual to adjust to local change and track short-term regularities.
“Indeed, learning and memory in general may be regarded as future-oriented adaptations that allow an individual, rather than a population, to adjust to local change and track short-term regularities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2.1. Toward a definition of mental time travel · p. 3
Amnesic patients such as K.C. may know facts and procedures without being able to recall a single personally experienced event leading to knowing them.
“Thus, amnesic patients, such as K.C., may know facts (e.g., the difference between stalagmites and stalactites) and procedures (e.g., how to play chess), without being able to recall a single personally experienced event leading to knowing them (Tulving 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tulving 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 1. Introduction · p. 1
Mental time travel into the past and future are related.
“Nevertheless, there is growing recognition that mental time travel into the past and future are related, and that the ultimate evolutionary advantage must lie with the capacity to access the future (Dudai & Carruthers 2005a; Suddendorf & Busby 2003b; 2005; Suddendorf & Corballis 1997; Tulving 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Dudai & Carruthers 2005a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Suddendorf & Busby 2003b; 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Suddendorf & Corballis 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ 2. A taxonomy of future-oriented cognition · p. 2
Semantic prospection is restricted because it builds on a knowledge base impervious to particularities of the learning event.
“Nevertheless, such prospection is restricted in that it builds on a knowledge base that is impervious to particularities of the learning event itself.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2.1. Toward a definition of mental time travel · p. 3
The distinction between remembering and knowing is supported by experimental manipulations, imaging studies, and dissociations following brain injury.
“This distinction is supported by experimental manipulations and imaging studies, and by dissociations in impairments following brain injury (Gardiner et al. 2002; Henson et al. 1999; Klein et al. 2002b; Tulving 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Gardiner et al. 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Henson et al. 1999 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Klein et al. 2002b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 2. A taxonomy of future-oriented cognition · p. 2
Declarative memories provide greater flexibility because they can be voluntarily triggered top-down from the frontal lobes.
“Declarative or explicit memories provide greater flexibility because they can also be voluntarily triggered topdown from the frontal lobes, rather than bottom-up through perception (Miyashita 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Miyashita 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ 2.1. Toward a definition of mental time travel · p. 4
Mental time travel provides increased behavioral flexibility to act in the present to increase future survival chances.
“The answer we propose is that mental time travel provides increased behavioral flexibility to act in the present to increase future survival chances (Suddendorf & Busby 2003b; 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suddendorf & Busby 2003b; 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ 2. A taxonomy of future-oriented cognition · p. 2
Semantic memory may enable semantic prospection that is voluntary and not stimulus-bound.
“Semantic memory may thus enable semantic prospection that is voluntary and not stimulus-bound.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2.1. Toward a definition of mental time travel · p. 3
The phenomenological experience of remembering is different from merely knowing a fact.
“The phenomenological experience of remembering , or what Tulving (1985) calls autonoetic or self-knowing consciousness, such as recollecting where and when one learned that Wellington is the capital of New Zealand, is different from merely knowing that fact.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tulving 1985 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ 2. A taxonomy of future-oriented cognition · p. 2
All non-declarative memory systems allow behavior to be modulated by experience such that the organism gains a future advantage.
“All these non-declarative memory systems allow behavior to be modulated by experience such that the organism gains a future advantage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1. Introduction · p. 2
Many animal species, as well as human neurological patients and children, show dissociations between what they know in the perceptual domain and what knowledge they can use to control action.
“Many animal species, as well as human neurological patients and children, show dissociations between what they know in the perceptual domain and what knowledge they can use to control action (Hauser 2003; Sterelny 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hauser 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sterelny 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ 2. A taxonomy of future-oriented cognition · p. 2
Non-declarative memory systems allow stimulus-driven prediction of regularities.
“They allow stimulus-driven prediction of regularities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1. Introduction · p. 2
Action systems differ in the flexibility or response breadth they provide.
“Action systems differ in the flexibility or response breadth they provide (Sterelny 2003); for example, they may include relatively narrow options such as hibernating or storing food, or highly flexible options like cooking and preserving food in diverse ways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sterelny 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3.1. Mental time travel into the past · p. 6
Rhesus monkeys seemed unable to learn that a preferred food was available only after a short interval, but not after a long one.
“Rhesus monkeys, for example, seemed unable to learn that a preferred food was available only after a short interval, but not after a long one (Hampton et al. 2005), whereas rats were able to learn that a particular arm of a maze contained chocolate pellets after a long delay but not after a short delay (Babb & Crystal 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hampton et al. 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ 2.2. Evidence for continuity of past and future mental time travel · p. 4
Episodic memory is often unreliable and subject to distortion.
“Although episodic memory preserves something of the particularities of individual events, it is often unreliable and subject to distortion, as we have seen.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2.2. Evidence for continuity of past and future mental time travel · p. 4
Normal adults report a decrease in phenomenological richness of both past and future episodes with increased distance from the present.
“Normal adults report a decrease in phenomenological richness of both past and future episodes with increased distance from the present (D'Argembeau & Van der Linden 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites D'Argembeau & Van der Linden 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 2.3. Neurophysiological evidence · p. 5
The prefrontal cortex has been substantially reorganized in the course of human evolution.
“Regardless of the question of size, there is also evidence that the prefrontal cortex has been substantially reorganized in the course of human evolution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given§ 3. Mental time travel in nonhuman animals? · p. 5
Nonhuman species commonly display behaviors that depend on non-declarative future-oriented systems.
“Nonhuman species commonly display behaviors that depend on non-declarative future-oriented systems, and there is strong evidence that some of them can also deploy semantic memory for future-directed action.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3.2. Mental time travel into the future · p. 7
Jays recache food if observed by a more dominant bird.
“Earlier, we alluded to evidence that they recache food if observed by a more dominant bird (Dally et al. 2006b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dally et al. 2006b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 2.2. Evidence for continuity of past and future mental time travel · p. 4
Amnesic patients unable to answer simple questions about yesterday's events are equally unable to say what might happen tomorrow.
“Amnesic patients who are unable to answer simple questions about yesterday's events have been found to be equally unable to say what might happen tomorrow (Klein et al. 2002b; Tulving 1985), and it is not until around age 4 that children are able to accurately answer both such questions (Busby & Suddendorf 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Klein et al. 2002b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Tulving 1985 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3.1. Mental time travel into the past · p. 5
Scrub jays can select food locations according to the type of food and how long it has been stored.
“Scrub jays can select food locations not only according to the type of food, but also according to how long it has been stored.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 3.2. Mental time travel into the future · p. 7
The rats' behavior suggests they had little sense of what would happen in the future.
“This suggests that they had little sense of what would happen in the future.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 2.3. Neurophysiological evidence · p. 5
Some neurophysiological evidence suggests mental time travel may be uniquely human, since brain areas involved have undergone changes not evident in other primates.
“Some of this evidence suggests, in fact, that mental time travel may be uniquely human, since the brain areas involved have apparently undergone changes that are not evident in other primates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3.2. Mental time travel into the future · p. 7
Adult jays modulate caching behavior in ways that seem to take the possibility of future pilfering into account.
“Whatever the outcome of such an experiment, adult jays have been shown to modulate caching behavior in ways that seem to take the possibility of future pilfering into account.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dally et al. 2006b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3. Mental time travel in nonhuman animals? · p. 5
There is strong evidence that some nonhuman species can deploy semantic memory for future-directed action.
“Nonhuman species commonly display behaviors that depend on non-declarative future-oriented systems, and there is strong evidence that some of them can also deploy semantic memory for future-directed action.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 3.1. Mental time travel into the past · p. 6
There are viable alternatives to the notion that evidence for www or wwww memories is evidence for mental time travel.
“Whether or not this specific hypothesis is correct, it should be clear that there are viable alternatives to the notion that evidence for www, or even wwww, memories is evidence for mental time travel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 2.3. Neurophysiological evidence · p. 5
The key to mental time travel may lie in part in the expansion of the brain, and the prefrontal cortex in particular, in human evolution.
“For example, the key to mental time travel may lie in part in the expansion of the brain, and the prefrontal cortex in particular, in human evolution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2.2. Evidence for continuity of past and future mental time travel · p. 4
It is not until around age 4 that children are able to accurately answer both questions about yesterday's events and what might happen tomorrow.
“Amnesic patients who are unable to answer simple questions about yesterday's events have been found to be equally unable to say what might happen tomorrow (Klein et al. 2002b; Tulving 1985), and it is not until around age 4 that children are able to accurately answer both such questions (Busby & Suddendorf 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Busby & Suddendorf 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 2.2. Evidence for continuity of past and future mental time travel · p. 4
Patients with depression who have trouble retrieving specific past memories also have trouble imagining specific future episodes.
“Patients with depression who have trouble retrieving specific memories from their past also have trouble imagining specific future episodes (Williams et al. 1996).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Williams et al. 1996 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 2.2. Evidence for continuity of past and future mental time travel · p. 4
In cases of amnesia, episodic memories are the most vulnerable.
“In cases of amnesia, moreover, it is episodic memories that are the most vulnerable (Wheeler et al. 1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wheeler et al. 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3.1. Mental time travel into the past · p. 6
Jays were more likely to move food to new locations if a more dominant bird observed the caching than if a less dominant bird did.
“The birds were more likely to move the food to new locations if a more dominant bird observed the caching than if a less dominant bird did so.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 2.2. Evidence for continuity of past and future mental time travel · p. 4
The episodic component provides the particularities that can fit future plans precisely to the occasion.
“Nevertheless, it is the episodic component that provides the particularities that can fit one's future plans precisely to the occasion - the seating arrangement, the clothes one might wear, the menu, the topics of conversation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 2.3. Neurophysiological evidence · p. 5
The involvement of the prefrontal cortex may depend on neural loops that also encompass the basal ganglia and perhaps other regions.
“The involvement of the prefrontal cortex may depend on neural loops that also encompass the basal ganglia and perhaps other regions as well.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2.2. Evidence for continuity of past and future mental time travel · p. 4
The temporal distribution of past events people envisage follows the same power function as the temporal distribution of anticipated future events.
“The temporal distribution of past events people envisage follows the same power function as the temporal distribution of anticipated future events (Spreng & Levine 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Spreng & Levine 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ 3.2. Mental time travel into the future · p. 7
When caching and retrieval develop in such predictable fashion, it appears to be based on instinctive or implicitly learned predispositions that may be modulated by semantic memory but need not involve mental time travel.
“When caching and retrieval develop in such predictable fashion, it appears to be based on instinctive or implicitly learned predispositions that may be modulated by semantic memory but need not involve mental time travel (Suddendorf & Busby 2003b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suddendorf & Busby 2003b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3.1. Mental time travel into the past · p. 6
Rats were able to learn that a particular arm of a maze contained chocolate pellets after a long delay but not after a short delay.
“Rhesus monkeys, for example, seemed unable to learn that a preferred food was available only after a short interval, but not after a long one (Hampton et al. 2005), whereas rats were able to learn that a particular arm of a maze contained chocolate pellets after a long delay but not after a short delay (Babb & Crystal 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Babb & Crystal 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 2.2. Evidence for continuity of past and future mental time travel · p. 4
Mental time travel into the past shares cognitive resources with mental construction of potential future episodes.
“However, various lines of evidence suggest that mental time travel into the past shares cognitive resources with mental construction of potential future episodes (Suddendorf & Corballis 1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suddendorf & Corballis 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3.1. Mental time travel into the past · p. 6
Jays may store information about who observes them cache.
“Recent evidence indicates that jays may indeed also store information about who observes them cache (Dally et al. 2006b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dally et al. 2006b
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 2.2. Evidence for continuity of past and future mental time travel · p. 4
The fragmentary and fragile nature of episodic memory suggests its adaptiveness may derive less from accurate record of personal history than from providing a vocabulary to construct planned future events.
“The fact that episodic memory is fragmentary and fragile suggests that its adaptiveness may derive less from its role as an accurate record of personal history than from providing a 'vocabulary' from which to construct planned future events (and perhaps to embellish events of the past).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3. Mental time travel in nonhuman animals? · p. 5
Human conversation is replete with references to past and planned future episodes.
“In marked contrast, human conversation is replete with references to past and planned future episodes (e.g., Szagun 1978).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Szagun 1978
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ 2.2. Evidence for continuity of past and future mental time travel · p. 4
Our ability to revisit the past may be only a design feature of our ability to conceive of the future.
“Indeed, our ability to revisit the past may be only a design feature of our ability to conceive of the future (Suddendorf & Busby 2003b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suddendorf & Busby 2003b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3.2. Mental time travel into the future · p. 7
Rats continued to cache food in locations in a maze where food was later repeatedly degraded or pilfered, even though they avoided those locations in retrieving food.
“For example, one study showed that rats continued to cache food in locations in a maze where food was later repeatedly degraded or pilfered, even though they avoided those locations in retrieving the food (McKenzie et al. 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McKenzie et al. 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ 3.1. Mental time travel into the past · p. 6
We remain unconvinced that any of these cases shows true mental time travel.
“Although we look forward to a more comprehensive table, we remain unconvinced that any of these cases shows true mental time travel (Hampton & Schwartz 2004; Roberts 2002; Suddendorf & Busby 2003b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Hampton & Schwartz 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Roberts 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Suddendorf & Busby 2003b
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 3.1. Mental time travel into the past · p. 6
Episodic-like memory may result from feed-forward mechanisms that need not be about the past at all.
“In fact, episodic-like memory may result from feed-forward mechanisms that need not be about the past at all.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 7
The selective advantage of mental time travel is the increased flexibility in acting in the present to secure future needs.
“We argued earlier that the selective advantage of mental time travel is the increased flexibility in acting in the present to secure future needs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8
In Mulcahy and Call (2006), in 7 out of 16 trials on average, apes carried a suitable tool into the waiting room and returned with it to obtain grapes an hour later.
“In 7 out of 16 trials, on average, the apes carried a suitable tool into the waiting room and returned with it to obtain grapes an hour later.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mulcahy & Call 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 4.1. The stage · p. 9
Human working memory appears to comprise, in addition to a central executive, two distinct subsystems: a phonological loop and a visuospatial sketchpad.
“Human working memory appears to comprise, in addition to a central executive, two distinct subsystems: a phonological loop and a visuospatial sketchpad.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baddeley 1992
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8
A third experiment showed that the apes could pass the task even when they could not see the apparatus during tool selection.
“A third experiment showed that the apes could pass the task even when they could not see the apparatus during tool selection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mulcahy & Call 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8
The best orangutan and bonobo still returned with a suitable tool in more cases than expected by chance after an overnight delay.
“This orangutan and the best performing bonobo were then tested again, but with an overnight delay between tool selection and return. They still returned with a suitable tool in more cases than expected by chance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mulcahy & Call 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8
Gorillas and orangutans can select an appropriate tool in one location to solve a problem at another location that was not simultaneously visible.
“Mulcahy et al. (2005), for example, have shown that gorillas and orangutans can select an appropriate tool in one location to solve a problem at another location that was not simultaneously visible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mulcahy et al. 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 3.2. Mental time travel into the future · p. 7
The learning constraints of regent honeyeaters distinguish their future-oriented learning from the flexible future-oriented behavior characteristic of human mental time travel.
“Though this learning is appropriately future-oriented to the contingencies of its habitat, such constraints distinguish it from the flexible future-oriented behavior characteristic of human mental time travel.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8
In the final control study, performance was poorer when subjects received a grape reward for returning the right tool but were not given an opportunity to use it.
“Performance in this condition was poorer, suggesting that they did plan ahead in the other studies (Mulcahy & Call 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mulcahy & Call 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 3.2. Mental time travel into the future · p. 7
Future-oriented behaviors may not be fundamentally different from non-behavioral species-specific adaptations to the same problem.
“Are these future-oriented behaviors fundamentally different from non-behavioral species-specific adaptations to the same problem, such as seasonally storing food as blubber or body fat? Perhaps not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 7
The Bischof-Köhler hypothesis may still apply to more individual, flexible situations involving non-instinctive behaviors.
“The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis may still apply to more individual, flexible situations involving non-instinctive behaviors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3.2. Mental time travel into the future · p. 7
When observed caching food, jays re-cache food only if they themselves had previously stolen the food of others.
“Another study has shown that, when observed caching food, jays re-cache food only if they themselves had previously stolen the food of others.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Emery & Clayton 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8
The data from the two control animals that never brought the tool back do not inform us about the power of the reward.
“Thus, their data do not inform us about the power of the reward.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8
Even if subsequent studies confirm that great apes can select and keep a different tool for a specific future use, it does not show anticipation of future needs as proposed by the Bischof-Köhler hypothesis.
“But even if subsequent studies confirm that great apes can select and keep a different tool for a specific future use, it does not show anticipation of future needs as proposed by the Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8
At present the limit proposed by the Bischof-Köhler hypothesis has not been falsified.
“More research is required to determine the extent of animal foresight, but at present the limit proposed by the Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis has not been falsified.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8
There were strong individual differences in performance, with one orangutan achieving 15 out of 16 correct.
“There were strong individual differences in performance, with one orangutan achieving 15 out of 16 correct.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mulcahy & Call 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductcitation§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8
The studies did not control or manipulate the drive or need state of the subjects.
“The studies did not control or manipulate the drive or need state of the subjects, and it is not unreasonable to assume that they all had a desire for grape rewards throughout testing (Suddendorf 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suddendorf 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The apes in the Mulcahy and Call studies had a desire for grape rewards throughout testing.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8
The 'future need' potentially anticipated in these studies refers to the 'need' for a tool to satisfy a current desire for the treat, not anticipation of a different internal drive or need state.
“The 'future need' potentially anticipated in these studies refers to the 'need' for a tool to satisfy a current desire for the treat, not anticipation of a different internal drive or need state (e.g., such as a future desire that is different from present).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 9
The data so far continue to suggest that mental time travel is unique to humans.
“We maintain that the data so far continue to suggest that mental time travel is unique to humans.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 4.8. Components of successful mental time travel · p. 12
If a component of mental time travel is present only weakly, if at all, in other species, mental time travel would be severely limited, at best.
“Should a component be present only weakly, if at all, in other species, mental time travel would be severely limited, at best.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 4.1. The stage · p. 9
To make offline processing directly relevant to situations, one has to be able to collate it with perceptions of the present real world.
“To make such offline processing, or mental play, directly relevant to situations, however, one also has to be able to collate it with perceptions of the present real world.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5. Some qualifications · p. 13
In other species, solutions to the need to bridge temporally distant events are typically highly specific and lack the flexibility of mental time travel.
“In other species, solutions to the need to bridge temporally distant events are typically highly specific and lack the flexibility of mental time travel.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5. Some qualifications · p. 13
Episodic memory may decline as a consequence of the increase in the extraction of facts and rules (crystallized intelligence).
“Episodic memory may decline as a consequence of the increase in the extraction of facts and rules, or what some would call crystallized intelligence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5. Some qualifications · p. 13
Retaining details of individual events becomes less important the more over-arching principles have been deduced.
“Retaining details of individual events becomes less important the more over-arching principles have been deduced.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5. Some qualifications · p. 13
This temporally extended learning mechanism appears to have evolved in response to a recurring problem with strong selective force.
“This temporally extended learning mechanism thus appears to have evolved in response to a recurring problem with strong selective force (those who eat too much of the wrong food die).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given§ 4.8. Components of successful mental time travel · p. 12
Support for most components of mental time travel in nonhuman animals is very slim.
“support for most others is very slim.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 4.8. Components of successful mental time travel · p. 12
Adult humans may fail to act now for a particular future event because of a deficiency in any one of the components of mental time travel.
“Adult humans may fail to act now for a particular future event because of a deficiency in any one of these components”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14
By 400,000 years ago some hominins had clearly developed aimed throwing, as revealed by wooden spears uncovered in Germany together with butchered horses.
“By 400,000 years ago some hominins had clearly developed aimed throwing, as revealed by wooden spears uncovered in Germany together with butchered horses (Thieme 1997).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Thieme 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14
The possibility of a gap between the human and animal mind need not contradict Darwinian principles of natural selection.
“The possibility of a gap between the human and animal mind need not contradict Darwinian principles of natural selection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14
The earliest hard evidence for foresight comprises stone tools that appear to have been transported for repeated use.
“The earliest hard evidence, quite literally, for foresight comprises stone tools that appear to have been transported for repeated use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5. Some qualifications · p. 13
Predictions can increasingly be made by abstract rules (semantic prospection) rather than through imagination of individual future events.
“Predictions can increasingly be made by abstract rules (i.e., using semantic prospection) rather than through imagination of individual future events.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.1. The stage · p. 9
Secondary representations allow an individual to test potential moves by mental rather than physical trial and error.
“So-called secondary representations are thought to allow just that (Perner 1991; Suddendorf 1999). In addition to a primary representation of current reality, a secondary representation of a goal constellation, for example, allows an individual to test potential moves by mental rather than physical trial and error.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Perner 1991
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Suddendorf 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 4.8. Components of successful mental time travel · p. 12
Around ages 3-4, implicated prefrontal regions mature.
“It is around this latter time that unequivocal evidence for episodic memory emerges, childhood amnesia ceases, and implicated prefrontal regions mature (e.g., Levine 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Levine 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 5. Some qualifications · p. 13
If the key function of mental time travel into the past is to inform and allow anticipation of the future, then in formative years people must retain as much event detail as possible to abstract facts and make specific predictions.
“If the key function of mental time travel into the past is indeed to inform and allow the anticipation of the future, then it is in the formative years that people have to retain as much event detail as possible in order to abstract facts and make specific predictions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 5. Some qualifications · p. 13
Semantic and episodic prospection may interact, just as semantic and episodic memory interact.
“Just as semantic and episodic memory interact (Tulving 2005), so may semantic and episodic prospection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tulving 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 5. Some qualifications · p. 13
Rats, even after thousands of trials, fail to learn the link between a stimulus and a reward if they are a few seconds apart and there is no secondary reinforcer.
“Rats, on the other hand, even after thousands of trials fail to learn the link between a stimulus and a reward if they are a few seconds apart, and there is no secondary reinforcer (Grice 1946, cited in Roberts 2002).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grice 1946, cited in Roberts 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 13
Haldane computed that a variant resulting in a mere 1% fitness advantage would increase in population frequency from 0.1% to 99.9% in just over 4,000 generations.
“Haldane (1927) computed that a variant resulting in a mere 1% in fitness would increase in population frequency from 0.1% to 99.9% in just over 4,000 generations, a time span that fits easily into hominin evolution, or even into the evolution of our own genus, Homo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haldane 1927 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ 4.2. The playwright · p. 9
Imaginary narratives may operate according to the principle of 'discrete infinity', involving recursive application of rules to create an unlimited set of potential future scenarios.
“Like language, imaginary narratives may operate according to the principle of 'discrete infinity' (Hauser et al. 2002), involving the recursive application of rules to create an unlimited set of potential future scenarios (Suddendorf & Corballis 1997).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hauser et al. 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Suddendorf & Corballis 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 4.8. Components of successful mental time travel · p. 12
Nonhuman animals may also be limited because of deficiencies in any of the components of mental time travel.
“Nonhuman animals may also be limited because of deficiencies in any of these components.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5. Some qualifications · p. 13
Relating events across time may be one of the key advantages provided by mental time travel into the past, as it offers humans additional information for prediction of events to follow.
“Relating events across time may be one of the key advantages provided by mental time travel into the past, as it offers humans additional information for prediction of events to follow.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.8. Components of successful mental time travel · p. 12
Around ages 3-4, unequivocal evidence for episodic memory emerges.
“It is around this latter time that unequivocal evidence for episodic memory emerges, childhood amnesia ceases, and implicated prefrontal regions mature (e.g., Levine 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Levine 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 4.8. Components of successful mental time travel · p. 12
Young children may fail to act now for a particular future event because one or another component of mental time travel is not yet fully developed.
“Young children may also fail to do so because one or the other of these components is not yet fully developed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5. Some qualifications · p. 13
Accumulating a vast pool of episodes of varied experiences provides an arsenal of information for future prediction.
“Accumulating a vast pool of episodes of varied experiences provides one with an arsenal of information for future prediction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.8. Components of successful mental time travel · p. 12
Around ages 3-4, childhood amnesia ceases.
“It is around this latter time that unequivocal evidence for episodic memory emerges, childhood amnesia ceases, and implicated prefrontal regions mature (e.g., Levine 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Levine 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 13
Mental time travel offers an additional degree of flexibility that, even if the adaptive advantage was initially small, was sufficient to ensure selection and fixation in the population.
“But mental time travel offers an additional degree of flexibility that, even if the adaptive advantage was in the first instance small, was sufficient to ensure selection and fixation in the population.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14
Reconstruction of knapping routines suggests that at least by the Middle Pleistocene hominins produced stone tools in one site to use them later at another.
“Reconstruction of knapping routines (using refit data) suggests that at least by the Middle Pleistocene hominins produced stone tools in one site to use them later at another (Hallos 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hallos 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 5. Some qualifications · p. 13
Snippets in mental time travel do not have to come from the same place and time; snippets from very different times can be strung together.
“In fact, the snippets do not have to come from the same place and time; snippets from very different times can be strung together.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.1. The stage · p. 9
During the second year of life, human children begin to display evidence for secondary representation in pretend play, invisible displacement tests, and other basic cognitive tasks.
“During the second year of life, human children begin to display evidence for secondary representation in each of these contexts (Perner 1991; Suddendorf & Whiten 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Perner 1991
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Suddendorf & Whiten 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ The continuum of 'looking forward,' and paradoxical requirements from memory · p. 17
Animals show meaningful precursors of foresight ability.
“As reviewed in the target article, animals nevertheless show meaningful 'precursors' of foresight ability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites target article
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14
Technological advances may have been secondary to abilities that evolved primarily in the social arena.
“Technological advances may have been secondary to abilities that evolved primarily in the social arena.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Is mental time travel a frame-of-reference issue? · p. 18
These competences rest on a common mechanism.
“All this suggests that these competences rest on a common mechanism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ The continuum of 'looking forward,' and paradoxical requirements from memory · p. 17
Nonhuman animals may possess foresight as a continuum of reduced magnitude rather than lacking it entirely.
“Until definitive evidence to support the claim that nonhumans lack foresight is potentially reported, this alternative of a continuum is as plausible and thus should be assigned a comparable likelihood”
- Also stated in: § The continuum of 'looking forward,' and paradoxical requirements from memory · p. 17 · plain
“we can follow the logic of Occam's razor and simply call it foresight of reduced magnitude.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § The continuum of 'looking forward,' and paradoxical requirements from memory · p. 17 · plain
- Interpretationnone given§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14
Modern humans use their planning capacities extensively to cooperate with, deceive, and manipulate conspecifics.
“Modern humans certainly use their planning capacities extensively to cooperate with, deceive, and manipulate conspecifics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14
One of the final steps that may have given humans a decisive edge over Neanderthals may have been autonomous speech.
“One of the final steps that may have given us a decisive edge over one of the last nonhuman hominins, the Neanderthals, may have been autonomous speech (Corballis 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Corballis 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ Randy L. Buckner · p. 20
Humans possess a brain system that functions to construct mental simulations of possible upcoming situations, a form of life simulator.
“humans possess a brain system, or interaction among brain systems, which functions to construct mental simulations that represent possible upcoming situations - a form of 'life simulator.'”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ The continuum of 'looking forward,' and paradoxical requirements from memory · p. 17
A task like getting a birthday gift, initially seeming remote from associations, could be achieved by relying on associations and their appropriate integration.
“Therefore, a task that initially seemed quite remote from being based on associations, could be achieved by relying on associations and their appropriate integration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Is mental time travel a frame-of-reference issue? · p. 19
Mental time travel and theory of mind appear as different outcomes of one and the same competence.
“mental time travel and theory of mind need not be externally arranged in a means-end relation, but appear as different outcomes of one and the same competence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning§ The continuum of 'looking forward,' and paradoxical requirements from memory · p. 18
A critical characteristic required from the memory system that subserves foresight is flexibility.
“A critical characteristic required from the memory system that subserves foresight is flexibility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Martin Bru ¨ne and Ute Bru ¨ne-Cohrs · p. 19
Mental time travel probably evolved because selection favoured individuals who could flexibly use it over those less able to create mental models of future events.
“In other words, MTT probably evolved because selection favoured individuals who had the capacity to flexibly use MTT over others who were less able to create mental models of future events, including social interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ The continuum of 'looking forward,' and paradoxical requirements from memory · p. 17
These manifestations in animals may represent actual foresights of lower complexity rather than precursors.
“According to the alternative I proposed here, however, instead of a precursor, these manifestations may represent actual foresights, albeit of lower complexity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Is mental time travel a frame-of-reference issue? · p. 18
The synchrony between mental time travel and theory of mind is due to the emergence of a shared competence: the ability to become aware of frames of reference.
“We argue that this synchrony is due to the emergence of a shared competence, namely, the ability to become aware of frames of reference.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The potential for frame-of-reference awareness is beyond the grasp of even the great apes.
- Premisecitation§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 23
Positive episodes are subjectively experienced with more details and with stronger feelings of reliving or pre-living than negative episodes, for both the past and the future.
“positive episodes are subjectively experienced with more details and with stronger feelings of (re)living than negative episodes, for both the past and the future”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites D'Argembeau & Van der Linden 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 22
The affective charge of the generated mental images is a key element in guiding our current decisions.
“the affective charge of the generated mental images is a key element in this respect, the driving force that guides our current decisions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Valerie A. Carr a and Indre V. Viskontas b · p. 22
The hippocampus may allow nonhuman animals to project both backwards in time and forwards into the future.
“The hippocampus is phylogenetically among the oldest parts of the brain, and may therefore allow nonhuman animals to project both backwards in time and forwards into the future”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The hippocampus is phylogenetically among the oldest parts of the brain.
- Premisecitation§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 23
When asked to think about their future, people spontaneously imagine more positive than negative events.
“when asked to think about their future, people spontaneously imagine more positive than negative events”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Newby-Clark & Ross 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 22
The conscious mental simulation of emotional situations, through mental time travel, provides unique information that promotes successful adaptation to life circumstances.
“the conscious mental simulation of emotional situations, through mental time travel, undoubtedly provides unique information that promotes successful adaptation to life circumstances”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 22
For both past and future, representations of positive events are associated with a greater feeling of reexperiencing or pre-experiencing than representations of negative events.
“for both past and future, representations of positive events are associated with a greater feeling of reexperiencing (or pre-experiencing) than representations of negative events”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites D'Argembeau & Van der Linden 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 22
Mental imagery, especially visual imagery, may play a particularly important role in representing goal-related information, as it is a sort of 'language' of goals.
“Mental imagery, especially visual imagery, may play a particularly important role in representing such goal-related information, as it is a sort of 'language' of goals”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Conway et al. 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 23
Memory tends to be biased toward confirming positive self-views.
“Thus, memory tends to be biased toward confirming positive self-views”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 22
Emotion plays an important role in this selection process, as it signals the occurrence of information that has potentially important implications with regard to goals.
“Emotion plays an important role in this selection process, as it signals the occurrence of information that has potentially important implications with regard to goals”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ellsworth & Scherer 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 22
Memories of past events and images of future ones are not literal representations of the past and future, but are instead the products of generative, constructive processes that recreate mental representations by rearranging pieces of information retrieved from memory.
“memories of past events and images of future ones are not literal representations of the past and future, but are instead the products of generative, constructive processes that (re)create mental representations by (re)arranging pieces of information retrieved from memory”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schacter & Addis 2007a
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ Valerie A. Carr a and Indre V. Viskontas b · p. 22
There is a wealth of evidence supporting a role for the hippocampus in both episodic memory and in envisioning future experiences.
“there is a wealth of evidence supporting a role for the hippocampus in both episodic memory and in envisioning future experiences”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 23
People judge positive events as being more likely to happen.
“judge positive events as being more likely to happen”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Weinstein 1980
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 22
Sometimes we remember or imagine positive experiences simply to feel better in the present.
“Sometimes we remember or imagine positive experiences, not so much to help us make decisions or plan future actions, but simply to feel better in the present”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 23
A third function of the emotional aspects of mental time travel may be to provide material to support representations of the self.
“a third function of the emotional aspects of mental time travel may be to provide material to support representations of the self”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Valerie A. Carr a and Indre V. Viskontas b · p. 22
A recent study of scrub jay behavior suggests that these birds are capable of future planning without reference to their current motivational state or fixed action patterns.
“a recent study of scrub jay behavior suggests that these birds are, in fact, capable of future planning without reference to their current motivational state, or fixed action patterns”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Raby et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 22
Affective states associated with mental simulations of positive and negative outcomes motivate us to engage in certain types of behaviors and to avoid others, in order to maximize the probability of attaining our goals.
“Affective states associated with mental simulations of positive and negative outcomes motivate us to engage in certain types of behaviors (e.g., start a diet) and to avoid others (e.g., quit smoking), in order to maximize the probability of attaining our goals”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 22
Mental representations of emotional episodes probably serve functions other than helping one make adaptive decisions.
“Although the primary function of emotional aspects of mental time travel may be to help one make adaptive decisions, mental representations of emotional episodes probably serve other functions as well”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 22
One may strive to generate or prolong a positive affective state by envisioning negative events, which allows one to feel good in comparison.
“one may strive to generate or prolong a positive affective state by envisioning negative events (e.g., how things might be worse), which allows one to feel good in comparison”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sanna 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23
The primary purpose of episodic memory is not to provide raw material for creative synthesis of future scenarios.
“its primary purpose is something other than to provide raw material for creative synthesis of future scenarios”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23
Episodic memory is badly designed for its alleged function of providing raw material for future planning.
“The problem with such accounts is that EM is badly designed for its alleged function”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: In machine learning, rote learning is an inefficient strategy.
- Rests on an assumption: The purpose of any learning task is to make generalization possible.
- Rests on an assumption: A good way to perform induction is to aggregate experience into structures such as prototypes or clusters.
- Rests on an assumption: Storing particular instances generally makes sense if they are statistically representative.
- Premisecitation§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 22
Autobiographical memories for emotional events are associated with a higher subjective feeling of mentally reliving the past.
“autobiographical memories for emotional events are associated with a higher subjective feeling of mentally reliving the past”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites D'Argembeau et al. 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Talarico et al. 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 22
Humans accord a privileged status to emotional information when they mentally travel backward or forward in time.
“humans accord a privileged status to emotional information when they mentally travel backward or forward in time”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 22
Emotional stimuli are typically remembered with more details than neutral stimuli.
“emotional stimuli are typically remembered with more details than neutral stimuli”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites D'Argembeau & Van der Linden 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kensinger et al. 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 22
Future rewards and punishments need not be consciously represented to guide decision making.
“Future rewards and punishments need not be consciously represented to guide decision making”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bechara & Damasio 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 22
People occasionally retrieve positive events in order to repair a negative mood.
“There is evidence that people occasionally retrieve positive events in order to repair a negative mood”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McFarland & Buehler 1998
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23
Only a tiny fraction of past experiences may be recounted in this way.
“only a tiny fraction of past experiences may be recounted in this way”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ The meaning of 'time' in episodic memory and mental time travel · p. 25
Adults and children as young as 4 years have available impressions of the ages of events that provide limited information about their distances in the past.
“adults, as well as children as young as 4 years, also have available impressions of the ages of events that provide limited information about their distances in the past”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Friedman 1996
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Friedman 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Mental time travel in the rat: Dissociation of recall and familiarity · p. 24
By using behavioural tasks in conjunction with lesion-based evidence, we can dissociate recall ('remembering') from familiarity-based recognition ('knowing').
“Thus, by using behavioural tasks in conjunction with lesion-based evidence, we can dissociate recall ('remembering') from familiarity-based recognition ('knowing')”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The intact recognition ability of fornix-transected rats was mediated by intact familiarity processes.
- Premisecitation§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23
Casual conversation is an arena where much of our social existence is decided.
“casual conversation is an arena where much of our social existence is decided”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dessalles 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23
To appear unexpected, a situation must be less complex (i.e., more easily describable) than expected.
“To appear unexpected, a situation must be less complex (i.e., more easily describable) than expected”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dessalles, in press
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ The meaning of 'time' in episodic memory and mental time travel · p. 25
Multiple representations and processes are involved in humans' memory for the times of past events and in their thinking about the times of future events.
“Multiple representations and processes are involved in humans' memory for the times of past events and in their thinking about the times of future events”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Friedman 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Friedman 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23
When it comes to establishing solidarity bonds, individuals prefer those who successfully demonstrate their informational capacity and their experience with unexpected events.
“When it comes to establishing solidarity bonds, individuals prefer those who successfully demonstrate their informational capacity and their experience with unexpected events”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23
Episodic memory is a crucial tool that enables us to produce the most relevant story at the right time.
“Episodic memory, in this context, is a crucial tool that enables us to produce the most relevant story at the right time”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ The meaning of 'time' in episodic memory and mental time travel · p. 25
Adults' sense of the times of past events depends mainly on inferring when the event must have happened by relating the content of the memory to one's general knowledge of personal, conventional, and natural time patterns.
“Adults' sense of the times of past events depends mainly on inferring when the event must have happened by relating the content of the memory to one's general knowledge of personal, conventional, and natural time patterns”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Friedman 1993
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23
Details such as precise location in space and time, weather conditions, persons present, and words exchanged are most often irrelevant and yet are almost systematically remembered, even in the long term when emotion is high.
“details such as the precise location in space and time, the weather conditions, the persons present, the words exchanged, and so forth, are most often irrelevant and yet are almost systematically remembered, even in the long term in cases when emotion is high”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brown & Kulik 1977
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23
It is crucial, when memorizing an episode, to remember every detail that may affect the cognitive complexity of the situation.
“It is thus crucial, when memorizing an episode, to remember every detail that may affect the cognitive complexity of the situation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ The meaning of 'time' in episodic memory and mental time travel · p. 25
Time is not integral or uniform in memory for the past or anticipation of the future.
“Time is not integral or uniform in memory for the past or anticipation of the future”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Mental time travel in the rat: Dissociation of recall and familiarity · p. 24
The past-directed aspect of mental time travel (episodic memory) is not unique to humans.
“We examine and reject the claim that the past-directed aspect of mental time travel (episodic memory) is unique to humans”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Mental time travel in the rat: Dissociation of recall and familiarity · p. 24
This behavioural evidence supports other recent work in rats showing that recollection and familiarity can be dissociated with hippocampal lesions specifically impairing recollection.
“This behavioural evidence supports other recent work in rats performing a food-rewarded, old-new, odour recognition paradigm in which statistical analysis of ROC curves show recollection, and familiarity can be dissociated from one another with lesions of the hippocampus specifically impairing recollection”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fortin et al. 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23
Episodic memory is highly selective; it retains a tiny fraction of all our daily experiences.
“Episodic memory is highly selective. It retains a tiny fraction of all our daily experiences”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23
Natural selection favored this preference and the narrative skills that allow any of us to display these qualities.
“Natural selection favored not only this preference, but also the narrative skills that allow any of us to display these qualities”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dessalles 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Mental time travel in the rat: Dissociation of recall and familiarity · p. 24
When humans code when something happened, they rarely code the exact time point; instead, they often use convenient contextual cues.
“When we code when something happened, we rarely code the exact time point; instead, we often use convenient contextual cues”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ The meaning of 'time' in episodic memory and mental time travel · p. 25
The impression that time is a seamless, linear continuum is at odds with findings on temporal abilities and underlying processes.
“The impression we sometimes have that time is a seamless, linear continuum is at odds with the findings of research on temporal abilities and the processes that underlie them”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Friedman 1993
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ Mental time travel in the rat: Dissociation of recall and familiarity · p. 24
Nonhuman animals may code when a remembered event occurred even without verbal labels.
“there is evidence that even without such labels, nonhuman animals may code this type of information”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23
Memorized episodes are exactly those which are narratable.
“It is not fortuitous that memorized episodes are exactly those which are narratable”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Storing events to retell them · p. 24
Episodic memory was not selected for increasing planning efficiency, but as a tool in support of language performance.
“It also explains the uniqueness of EM, which was not selected for increasing planning efficiency, but as a tool in support of language performance”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ The meaning of 'time' in episodic memory and mental time travel · p. 25
Five-year-olds, who can remember specific past events and anticipate specific events to come, sometimes confuse the past-future status of these events.
“5-year-olds, who can remember specific past events and anticipate specific events to come, sometimes confuse the pastfuture status of these events”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Friedman 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ The meaning of 'time' in episodic memory and mental time travel · p. 25
What appear to be genuine episodic memories are more like 'islands in time' than memories one reaches by mentally traveling through some temporally organized representation.
“What appear to be genuine EMs are more like 'islands in time' than memories one reaches by mentally traveling through some temporally organized representation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26
Specific predictions about future events can, in principle, be made by using generic prior knowledge in a combinatorial fashion.
“specific predictions about future events can, in principle, be made by using generic prior knowledge in a combinatorial fashion”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Glymour 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26
To foresee the possibility of being mugged in certain blocks of the city at night, one does not need the actual experience of having been mugged there at night; general knowledge of risky time periods and neighborhoods is enough.
“in order to foresee the possibility that I may be mugged if I walk through certain blocks of the city at night, I do not need the actual experience of having been mugged there at night. A general knowledge of risky time periods and risky neighborhoods is enough”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26
The Bayesian framework is versatile, in that it can use all available relevant information, including different forms of memory, to arrive at a prediction.
“Third, the Bayesian framework is versatile, in that it can use all available relevant information, including different forms of memory, to arrive at a prediction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26
What one can predict about the future will be limited by one's episodic memory if only past experiences can be used.
“what one can predict about the future will be limited by one's episodic memory”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26
Future events can be predicted with sufficient specificity without having to have episodic memory of specific past events.
“Future events can be predicted with sufficient specificity without having to have episodic memory of specific past events”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Past and future, human and nonhuman, semantic / procedural and episodic · p. 27
The emergence of past/future episodic memory was also the emergence, for the first time in evolution, of types of mental representation incorporating notions of past and future time.
“This entails that the emergence of past / future episodic memory was also the emergence, for the first time in evolution, of types of mental representation incorporating notions of past and future time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26
Mental time travel must play a correspondingly smaller role in foresight.
“mental time travel must play a correspondingly smaller role, in foresight”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ The meaning of 'time' in episodic memory and mental time travel · p. 25
The metaphor of 'traveling through time' can unintentionally imply a unity and continuity of time that is at odds with the fragmentary, manifold way humans experience it.
“The metaphor can unintentionally imply a unity and continuity of time that is quite at odds with the fragmentary, manifold way humans experience it”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26
Episodic memory by itself is a computational bottleneck.
“That is, episodic memory by itself is a computational bottleneck.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26
Episodic memory is the least suitable form of memory in terms of its amenability to generalization and extrapolation.
“Note that in terms of its amenability to generalization and extrapolation, episodic memory is the least suitable form of memory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ The meaning of 'time' in episodic memory and mental time travel · p. 25
We are poor at remembering the internal order of some episodic memories.
“it seems likely that we are poor at remembering the internal order of some EMs”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26
The future value of a given parameter can be estimated by combining relevant probabilistic information about the past and present values of the parameter.
“The future value of a given parameter can be estimated by combining the relevant probabilistic information about the past and present values of the parameter”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26
The Bayesian estimation theory encapsulates general computational principles into a powerful and flexible framework for making predictions.
“The Bayesian estimation theory encapsulates the aforementioned general computational principles into a powerful and flexible framework for making predictions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Davidson & Wolpert 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Glymour 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Krauth 1983
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26
In many cases, Bayesian prediction can be shown to be ideal.
“Second, in many cases, Bayesian prediction can be shown to be ideal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26
Bayesian estimation theory provides a framework by which one can make predictions about specific future events by combining information about various generic patterns in past experience.
“Bayesian estimation theory provides a framework by which one can make predictions about specific future events by combining information about various generic patterns in the past experience”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Glymour 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26
Without the ability to extrapolate from generalities, the amount of particularities the brain would have to store would be subject to a combinatorial explosion.
“Without the ability to extrapolate from generalities, the amount of particularities the brain would have to store would be subject to a combinatorial explosion”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Past and future, human and nonhuman, semantic / procedural and episodic · p. 27
Mulcahy and Call (2006) showed that some bonobos collected a specific tool for use on a specific food-retrieving task as much as 14 hours later.
“Mulcahy and Call (2006) showed that some bonobos in their experiment collected a specific tool for use on a specific foodretrieving task as much as 14 hours later.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mulcahy and Call 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26
Other types of memory must play a major role in foresight.
“other types of memory must play a major role”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Past and future, human and nonhuman, semantic / procedural and episodic · p. 27
Cook et al. demonstrated overlap between retrospective memory and prospective memory in rats.
“Cook et al. (1983) also demonstrated the overlap between retrospective memory and prospective memory in rats.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cook et al. 1983
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ The meaning of 'time' in episodic memory and mental time travel · p. 25
Children anticipate particular events (and plan for them) before they have a clear understanding of when in the future the events will occur.
“children anticipate particular events (and plan for them) before they have a clear understanding of when in the future the events will occur”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Friedman 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ The meaning of 'time' in episodic memory and mental time travel · p. 25
A differentiated sense of the future depends on mental representations of time patterns, probably supplemented from early childhood onward with propositions that are active in memory.
“A differentiated sense of the future depends on mental representations of time patterns, probably supplemented from early childhood onward with propositions that are active in memory”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Friedman 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Prospection or projection: Neurobiological basis of stimulus-independent mental traveling · p. 31
The common activation might be considered a consequence of greater demand of mental time travel during event elaboration both for future and past.
“which might be considered a consequence of greater demand of the mental time travel during the event elaboration both for the future and the past.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Developing past and future selves for time travel narratives · p. 30
The unique time travel addition in human evolution is not in foreseeing the future, but rather, the ability to recall the self in specific past events, that is, episodic memory.
“the unique time travel addition in human evolution is not in foreseeing the future, but rather, the ability to recall the self in specific past events, that is, episodic memory (EM).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Prospection or projection: Neurobiological basis of stimulus-independent mental traveling · p. 31
The magnitude of activity in each subregion was characteristically modulated by future/past orientation and temporal distance from the present.
“magnitude of the activity in each subregion was characteristically modulated by future / past orientation and temporal distance from the present.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Okuda et al. 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Prospection or projection: Neurobiological basis of stimulus-independent mental traveling · p. 31
Okuda et al. (2003) found that a basically similar brain network involving medial aspects of the prefrontal, temporal, and parietal cortices was activated during both thinking about the future and about past events.
“They found that a basically similar brain network involving medial aspects of the prefrontal, temporal, and parietal cortices was activated during both thinking about the future and about past events”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Okuda et al. 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ Prospection or projection: Neurobiological basis of stimulus-independent mental traveling · p. 30
Prospection can be better understood in a broader context of self-projection into other times, places, or agents that can share the same cerebral basis involving medial aspects of prefrontal, parietal, and temporal cortices.
“Recent works suggest that prospection can be better understood in a broader context of selfprojection into other times, places, or agents that can share the same cerebral basis involving medial aspects of prefrontal, parietal, and temporal cortices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Prospection or projection: Neurobiological basis of stimulus-independent mental traveling · p. 31
Under well-controlled experimental setting, common activation in core network of medial prefrontal-temporal-parietal cortices was observed particularly during event elaboration.
“Under such a wellcontrolled experimental setting, the common activation in the core network of the medial prefrontal-temporal-parietal cortices were observed particularly during the event elaboration”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Addis et al. (2007)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ Developing past and future selves for time travel narratives · p. 29
Skill in narrative construction and understanding and its use in personal memory recounts is necessary to autobiographical memory.
“Prominent among the achievements Nelson and Fivush (2004) identified as necessary to autobiographical memory was skill in narrative construction and understanding and its use in personal memory recounts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nelson & Fivush 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Memory, imagination, and the asymmetry between past and future · p. 28
The existence of a more or less veridical memory for the past lends utility to revisiting that past in the imagination through mental time travel instead of relying on semantic memory.
“It is the existence of a more or less veridical memory for the past which, on occasion, lends utility to revisiting that past in the imagination through mental time travel instead of relying on the distillate of that past provided by semantic memory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Developing past and future selves for time travel narratives · p. 29
Autobiographical memory consisting of narratives from the personal past emerges gradually over the preschool years as children gain practice in reminiscing with others.
“Autobiographical memory consisting of narratives from the personal past emerges gradually over the preschool years as children gain practice in reminiscing with others about things they have experienced together or separately”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nelson & Fivush 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Developing past and future selves for time travel narratives · p. 30
The emergence of both personal memory and personal possible futures is attributable to the social and cultural conditions and narrative framing of human lives and experiences.
“These complexities of the developing self in the social world strongly imply that the emergence of both personal memory and personal possible futures is attributable to the social and cultural conditions and narrative framing of human lives and experiences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ Has mental time travel really affected human culture? · p. 29
It has yet to be established empirically that mental time travel has affected cultural change in a significant manner.
“First, it has yet to be established empirically that mental time travel has affected cultural change in a significant manner.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Past and future, human and nonhuman, semantic / procedural and episodic · p. 27
There is increasing evidence for coinvolvement of motor and sensory components in memory for objects and actions, tending to conflate the semantic/procedural distinction.
“There is now increasing evidence for coinvolvement of motor and sensory components in memory for objects and actions, tending to conflate the semantic / procedural distinction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hommel et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Has mental time travel really affected human culture? · p. 29
Mental time travel allows people to simulate potential future scenarios in order to anticipate and plan for novel future events in a way that does not appear to have any parallel in biological evolution.
“Mental time travel allows people to simulate potential future scenarios in order to anticipate and plan for novel future events in a way that does not appear to have any parallel in biological evolution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Prospection or projection: Neurobiological basis of stimulus-independent mental traveling · p. 31
Szpunar et al. (2007) confirmed common engagement of this core network in remembering/envisioning self-relevant autobiographical events in past and future.
“Szpunar et al. (2007) also used eventrelated fMRI and confirmed common engagement of this core network in remembering / envisioning of self-relevant, autobiographical events in the past and future.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Szpunar et al. (2007)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ Has mental time travel really affected human culture? · p. 29
Even though people can simulate future scenarios, there is no guarantee that this simulation will be accurate.
“Even though people can simulate future scenarios, there is no guarantee that this simulation will be accurate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ On the constructive episodic simulation of past and future events · p. 34
These data suggest that episodic simulation of future events involves an even more intense constructive process than does episodic remembering of past events.
“these data suggest that episodic simulation of future events involves an even more intense constructive process than does episodic remembering of past events.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ Empirical evaluation of mental time travel · p. 32
The absence of clear, empirically tractable, behavioural criteria for determining capacity for MTT restricts the usefulness of the MTT hypothesis in comparative research.
“the absence of clear, empirically tractable, behavioural criteria for determining the capacity for MTT restricts its usefulness in comparative research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Prospection or projection: Neurobiological basis of stimulus-independent mental traveling · p. 31
The gateway model explains regulation between the two prospection systems as a primary function of the anterior portion of the prefrontal cortex.
“Again, the gateway model explains regulation between the two systems as a primary function of the anterior portion of the prefrontal cortex.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Burgess et al. (2005; 2006)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ What are the evolutionary causes of mental time travel? · p. 32
Savannah conditions offered some hominins a wider variety of food sources that were more transient and scattered than those exploited by other primates.
“Savannah conditions offered some hominins a wider variety of food sources, and these food sources were more transient and scattered than those exploited by other primates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bickerton 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ What are the evolutionary causes of mental time travel? · p. 32
The day ranges of early hominids were more extended than those of extant apes.
“Therefore, the day ranges of the early hominids were more extended than those of extant apes (cf. Bickerton 2002).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bickerton 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ On the constructive episodic simulation of past and future events · p. 34
Four of five hippocampal amnesics exhibited deficits in the ability to imagine novel events.
“four of five hippocampal amnesics exhibited deficits in the ability to imagine novel events.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hassabis et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Empirical evaluation of mental time travel · p. 33
It is possible to semantically arrange a seating plan for a forthcoming event without needing mental time travel to envisage oneself at the table.
“it is quite possible to semantically arrange a seating plan for a forthcoming event without needing mental time travel to envisage oneself at the table.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Prospection or projection: Neurobiological basis of stimulus-independent mental traveling · p. 31
The anterior part of the prefrontal cortex acts as a gateway that modulates an attentional bias between stimulus-independent mental processes and stimulus-oriented immediate cognitions.
“the anterior part of the prefrontal cortex acts as a gateway that modulates an attentional bias between stimulus-independent mental processes and stimulus-oriented immediate cognitions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Burgess et al. (2005; 2006)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ What are the evolutionary causes of mental time travel? · p. 32
Division of labor in modern human hunting and gathering is deeply dependent on MTT.
“Division of labor in the modern human form of hunting and gathering is deeply dependent on mental time travel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning§ On the constructive episodic simulation of past and future events · p. 33
Episodic remembering and future thinking both depend critically on relational processes that link or bind together distinct elements of an experience.
“In particular, episodic remembering and future thinking both depend critically on relational processes that link or bind together distinct elements of an experience.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Schacter & Addis 2007a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schacter & Addis 2007b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ On the constructive episodic simulation of past and future events · p. 34
Two new neuroimaging studies (Addis et al. 2007; Szpunar et al. 2007) demonstrate that prefrontal, medial temporal, and parietal regions previously associated with episodic remembering show similar increases in activity when imagining the future or recollecting the past.
“two new neuroimaging studies (Addis et al. 2007; Szpunar et al. 2007) build on earlier work from Okuda et al. (2003) by demonstrating that a number of prefrontal, medial temporal, and parietal regions previously associated with episodic remembering show similar increases in activity, relative to control tasks, when imagining the future or recollecting the past.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Addis et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Szpunar et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ On the constructive episodic simulation of past and future events · p. 33
The constructive episodic simulation hypothesis predicts considerable overlap in processes that support remembering the past and imagining the future.
“This hypothesis predicts considerable overlap in the processes that support remembering the past and imagining the future.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning§ What are the evolutionary causes of mental time travel? · p. 32
The fitness of hominids in this niche increased with adaptations for long ranging, as indicated by skeletal remains.
“The fitness of the hominids in this niche increased with adaptations for long ranging, as indicated by the skeletal remains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Empirical evaluation of mental time travel · p. 32
Without specific behavioural criteria, it is not possible to empirically evaluate the claim that MTT is unique to humans, because in absence of language, cognitive capacities of animals can only be inferred from behaviour.
“without such criteria, it is not possible to empirically evaluate their claim that mental time travel is unique to humans, because, in the absence of language, the cognitive capacities of animals can only be inferred from their behaviour.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ What are the evolutionary causes of mental time travel? · p. 32
The Oldowan lifestyle was signified by an extension in time and space.
“The Oldowan life style was signified by an extension in time and space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ What are the evolutionary causes of mental time travel? · p. 32
The Oldowan culture (2.6-1.5 mya) constituted an ecological niche that enhanced the ability to mentally represent a possible future.
“we argue that the Oldowan culture, 2.6 to 1.5 million years ago, constituted an ecological niche that enhanced the ability to mentally represent a possible future.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Osvath and Gärdenfors (2005)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ What are the evolutionary causes of mental time travel? · p. 32
The social factors proposal does not explain why advanced MTT should not exist among other apes or animals.
“A problem with this proposal is that it does not explain why advanced MTT should not exist among other apes or animals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ What are the evolutionary causes of mental time travel? · p. 32
There is clear evidence that transport of artifacts (at least stone tools) was an important trait of Oldowan culture.
“there is clear evidence that transport of the artifacts (at least the stone tools) was an important trait of the culture (Toth 1985).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Toth 1985
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Prospection or projection: Neurobiological basis of stimulus-independent mental traveling · p. 31
Cognitive operations independent of environmental stimulus and motor responses are the most fundamental requirement for mental travel to objectives not present in immediate perceptual-motor representations.
“It is plausible that cognitive operations, independent of environmental stimulus and motor responses to it, are the most fundamental requirement for mental travel to any other objectives that are not present in one's immediate perceptual-motor representations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ What are the evolutionary causes of mental time travel? · p. 31
General social factors do not suffice as an evolutionary explanation for why only humans have advanced MTT, given that other primates are also highly social.
“General social factors do not suffice, given that other primates are also highly social.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Prospection or projection: Neurobiological basis of stimulus-independent mental traveling · p. 31
Available neurobiological data suggest that the mechanism of mental time travel should be extended to a broader context of 'mental traveling,' not only in time domain but also spatial context and others' minds.
“available neurobiological data appear to suggest that the mechanism should be extended to a broader context of 'mental traveling,' not only in the time domain but also in the spatial context and others' minds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Empirical evaluation of mental time travel · p. 33
The only significant difference between episodic and semantic future thinking is the sensation of pre-experiencing one's own personal future.
“suggest that the only significant difference between episodic and semantic future thinking is the sensation of pre-experiencing one's own personal future.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Empirical evaluation of mental time travel · p. 33
Even a 'yes' in every box in Table 1 of the target article is not sufficient to establish episodic-like character of memory in absence of criteria of integration and flexibility.
“even a 'yes' in every box in Table 1 of the target article is not sufficient to establish the episodic-like character of memory in the absence of the criteria of integration and flexibility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 35
Not all animals are strictly bound to the present.
“Altogether, these results indicate that not all animals are strictly bound to the present.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Studying mental states is not a research program for comparative cognition · p. 34
Progress in answering comparative questions is most likely when the process being compared is already well understood within at least one species.
“Progress in answering such questions is most likely to be made when the process being compared across species is already well understood within at least one of the species in question, human or other animal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 35
Chimpanzees may appreciate the time dimension itself.
“However, we showed that chimpanzees may appreciate exactly this time dimension.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 35
Planning for the future and recollection of past experiences are probably linked.
“planning for the future and recollection of past experiences are probably linked (e.g., Suddendorf 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suddendorf 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 35
Rodents, monkeys, great apes, and scrub jays can associate two or more elements (what, where, when, who) from a past experience and combine them to direct current behaviour.
“their review shows that rodents, monkeys, great apes, and scrub jays can associate two or more elements (what, where, when, who) from a past experience and combine them to direct current behaviour.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites S&C
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Studying mental states is not a research program for comparative cognition · p. 35
Research on monkey metacognition is unique in richness and diversity of convergent data among attempts to document behaviors in animals functionally similar to those accompanied by distinct kinds of awareness in humans.
“among attempts to document behaviors in animals functionally similar to those accompanied by distinct kinds of awareness in humans, research on monkey metacognition is unique in richness and diversity of convergent data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 35
S&C's approach distinguishing different cognitive components actually allows for a Darwinian continuity without MTT in animals.
“their approach to mental time travel (MTT), distinguishing different cognitive components, that is, the 'play' (or theater) metaphor, actually allows for a Darwinian continuity without MTT in animals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 35
These results are first indications that animals, too, may possess capacities related to mental time travel.
“Although more controls are needed, these results are first indications that animals, too, may possess capacities related to MTT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 35
In the replicated study, chimpanzees had to collect the appropriate tools and bring them back while the apparatus and experimenter remained out of sight.
“Chimpanzees had to collect the appropriate tools and bring them back while the apparatus and experimenter remained out of sight.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Studying mental states is not a research program for comparative cognition · p. 35
All animals are superbly equipped with learning and timing mechanisms allowing them to use their own and their ancestors' past to determine future behavior.
“all animals are superbly equipped with learning and timing mechanisms allowing them to use their own and their ancestors' past to determine future behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Roberts 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Shettleworth 1998
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Studying mental states is not a research program for comparative cognition · p. 34
There is a rich body of convergent evidence from several laboratories and testing paradigms consistent with rhesus macaques being able to monitor both certainty of perceptual judgments and strength of memories.
“there is a now a rich body of convergent evidence from several laboratories and testing paradigms consistent with these monkeys' being able to monitor both the certainty of their perceptual judgments and the strength of their memories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Hampton 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Smith & Washburn 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kornell et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ On the constructive episodic simulation of past and future events · p. 34
The function of binding multimodal information makes the episodic buffer well suited to serving as a stage for future event simulations.
“The function of binding multimodal information from diverse systems makes the episodic buffer well suited to serving as a stage for future event simulations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ On the constructive episodic simulation of past and future events · p. 34
FMRI data indicate that medial BA 10 is a candidate site of the episodic buffer, because it is preferentially activated during maintenance of integrated versus unintegrated information.
“FMRI data from a working memory task that requires integration of spatial and verbal information indicate that medial BA 10 is a candidate site of the episodic buffer, because it is preferentially activated during maintenance of integrated versus unintegrated information (Prabhakaran et al. 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Prabhakaran et al. 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 35
A previously learned rule cannot account for the chimpanzees' behaviour.
“so a previously learned rule cannot account for their behaviour.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 36
Chimpanzees had voluntary control over this inhibition.
“In addition, chimpanzees had voluntary control over this inhibition, since, with the longer waiting times, they either decided to control themselves or chose not to.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ R2.5. Combinations and recombinations · p. 41
Episodic memory may in fact be a design feature of the foresight system (the Future-first hypothesis).
“lending support to our argument (the Future-first hypothesis) that episodic memory may in fact be a design feature of the foresight system”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites D'Argembeau & Van der Linden
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ R2.5. Combinations and recombinations · p. 41
The peculiar human capacity for recursion drives the recombination of elements not only in mental time travel but also in other spheres such as language, theory of mind, and music.
“we focused especially on the peculiar human capacity for recursion, which drives the recombination of elements not only in mental time travel but also in other spheres such as language, theory of mind, and music (Corballis 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Corballis 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ R2.4. Beyond past and future · p. 41
The recursion evident in theory of mind is also evident in mental time travel.
“The recursion evident in theory of mind (e.g., I believe that you know what she wants) is also evident in mental time travel (e.g., I remember that I thought yesterday about what you are going to do tomorrow).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ R2.5. Combinations and recombinations · p. 41
One characteristic of mental time travel that distinguishes it from instinct and associative learning is its flexibility.
“One characteristic of mental time travel that distinguishes it from instinct and associative learning is its flexibility.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suddendorf & Corballis 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ R2.4. Beyond past and future · p. 41
Each of mental time travel and theory of mind appears to be intimately intertwined with the other.
“on the other hand, each appears to be intimately intertwined with the other.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ R3. Mental time travel and neuroscience · p. 41
The hippocampus is probably critical to foresight.
“and probably to foresight (e.g., Hassabis et al. 2007)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hassabis et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ R2.5. Combinations and recombinations · p. 41
Imagining future episodes is based on both semantic knowledge and episodic memory.
“We agree that imagining future episodes is based on both semantic knowledge and episodic memory,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ R2.5. Combinations and recombinations · p. 41
The error-prone nature of episodic memory is the result of a system geared towards flexible recombination of future events, rather than towards faithful reconstruction of the past.
“Schacter & Addis reinforce our claim that the error-prone nature of episodic memory is the result of a system geared towards flexible recombination of future events, rather than towards faithful reconstruction of the past”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schacter & Addis 2007a
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ R3. Mental time travel and neuroscience · p. 41
The prefrontal cortex may provide at least part of the extra ingredients that permit mental time travel.
“In the target article, we suggest that the prefrontal cortex may provide at least part of the extra ingredients that permit mental time travel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 35
Chimpanzees' performance on the waiting to exchange task resembles that of children.
“their performance resembles that of children (Mischel et al. 1989).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mischel et al. 1989
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ R3. Mental time travel and neuroscience · p. 41
The neopallium in birds has evolved many of the functions of the neocortex.
“it is becoming clear in any case that the neopallium in birds has evolved many of the functions of the neocortex (Jarvis et al. 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jarvis et al. 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ R3. Mental time travel and neuroscience · p. 41
The hippocampus is critical to declarative memories.
“there can be no doubt, as Carr & Viskontas document, that the hippocampus is indeed critical to declarative memories (e.g., de Haan et al. 2006)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites de Haan et al. 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 36
The results of the waiting to exchange task indicate that chimpanzees can inhibit a simple response in order to increase their total future reward.
“They indicate that chimpanzees can '[inhibit] a simple response in order to increase' their 'total future reward' (sect. 4.6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ R3. Mental time travel and neuroscience · p. 41
Most human brain-imaging studies suggest that the prefrontal and parietal regions play critical roles in both episodic memory and future thinking.
“Most human brain-imaging studies, such as those summarized by Buckner, Okuda, and Schacter & Addis, suggest that the prefrontal and parietal regions play critical roles in both episodic memory and future thinking (e.g., Addis et al. 2007, Okuda et al. 2003, Szpunar et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Addis et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Okuda et al. 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Szpunar et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 35
Chimpanzees appreciate the time dimension for a time period exceeding that of other tested animals.
“Chimpanzees appreciate the time dimension for a time period exceeding that of other tested animals”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ ( Atance & Meltzoff ; Shettleworth ). · p. 42
Through social interactions with adults and the scaffolding provided by talk about past events, children slowly acquire the narrative skill required to construct their autobiographies and a more mature sense of self and other.
“Through the social interactions with adults and the scaffolding provided by talk about past events, children slowly seem to acquire the narrative skill required to construct their autobiographies and a more mature sense of self and other (e.g., Nelson & Fivush 2004; Reese 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Nelson & Fivush 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Reese 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ ( Atance & Meltzoff ; Shettleworth ). · p. 43
Children develop the ability to differentiate between the times of events gradually from about age 4 onwards.
“Children develop these skills gradually from about age 4 onwards.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Friedman 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ ( Atance & Meltzoff ; Shettleworth ). · p. 42
Social processes are not necessarily the sole determinants of mental time travel.
“we caution that these factors are not necessarily the sole determinants of mental time travel.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ R5.1. Are behavioral tests possible? · p. 44
The human capacity for mental time travel is not restricted in content in any apparent way, but instead is open-ended and domain general.
“and note that the human capacity is not restricted in content in any apparent way, but instead is open-ended and domain general.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ R5.1. Are behavioral tests possible? · p. 44
There is convincing evidence for secondary representation (the stage component) in great apes.
“Suddendorf and Whiten (2001), for example, have shown that there is convincing evidence for secondary representation (the stage component) in great apes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suddendorf and Whiten 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ R5.2. New data on animal foresight · p. 44
A closer look at the procedure raises some doubt about whether the birds were in fact acting with specific future hunger in mind.
“A closer look at the procedure raises some doubt about whether the birds were in fact acting with specific future hunger in mind.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ ( Atance & Meltzoff ; Shettleworth ). · p. 43
Increased parental elaboration may not so much change or cause mental time travel per se, but may teach and encourage their reporting.
“Nonetheless, increased parental elaboration may not so much change or cause mental time travel per se, but may teach and encourage their reporting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ ( Atance & Meltzoff ; Shettleworth ). · p. 43
There is more to mental time travel than just talk.
“We argue that there is more to mental time travel than just talk.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ R5.1. Are behavioral tests possible? · p. 43
Loss of episodic memory in amnesic patients is not merely the loss of a phenomenological sensation, or quale, but has fundamental consequences for the sufferer.
“Clearly, loss of episodic memory in amnesic patients is not merely the loss of a phenomenological sensation, or quale, but has fundamental consequences for the sufferer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ ( Atance & Meltzoff ; Shettleworth ). · p. 43
Children of mothers who elaborate more in their conversations about past events score higher on measures of autobiographical memory.
“Many studies have shown that children of mothers who elaborate more in their conversations about past events score higher on measures of autobiographical memory (for a review, see Fivush et al. 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fivush et al. 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ R5.2. New data on animal foresight · p. 44
In a second experiment, scrub jays were given different kinds of food in different locations, and later they cached more food of each particular kind in the location not associated with that food.
“In a second experiment, they were given different kinds of food in different locations, and later they cached more food of each particular kind in the location not associated with that food.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Raby et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ R5.1. Are behavioral tests possible? · p. 44
The key adaptive advantage of mental time travel is the flexibility it offers for acting now to increase future survival and reproduction chances (the Flexibility hypothesis).
“We made the case that the key adaptive advantage of mental time travel is the flexibility it offers for acting now to increase future survival and reproduction chances (the Flexibility hypothesis )”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given§ R5.1. Are behavioral tests possible? · p. 44
Scrub jays, like various other bird species, develop caching in predictable stages that suggest a prominent role of innate factors.
“Scrub jays, like various other bird species, develop caching in predictable stages that suggest a prominent role of innate factors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ R5.1. Are behavioral tests possible? · p. 43
Phenomenology is not the only difference between episodic and semantic memory.
“We do not think that this is the only difference.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ ( Atance & Meltzoff ; Shettleworth ). · p. 43
There is some, though much more limited, evidence of a similar link between elaboration and children's thinking about the future.
“There is also some, though much more limited, evidence of a similar link between elaboration and children's thinking about the future (Hudson 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hudson 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ ( Atance & Meltzoff ; Shettleworth ). · p. 42
Social and cultural factors play an important role in the development of episodic memory.
“we fully agree with her, and other prominent contributors to this literature that social and cultural factors play an important role in the development of episodic memory (e.g., Fivush et al. 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fivush et al. 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ R5.3. Continuity in animal competence · p. 45
There are reasons to distinguish between mental time travel and the various other kinds of future-directed capacities, such as instinctual, procedural, and semantic prospection.
“However, there are reasons to distinguish between mental time travel and the various other kinds of future-directed capacities, such as instinctual, procedural, and semantic prospection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ R5.2. New data on animal foresight · p. 44
Mulcahy and Call's third experiment showed that the apes could pass the task even when they could not see the apparatus during tool selection.
“we already noted in the target article that Mulcahy and Call's 'third experiment showed that the apes could pass the task even when they could not see the apparatus during tool selection'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mulcahy and Call 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ R5.3. Continuity in animal competence · p. 45
Chimpanzees can learn to hold a desired cookie for up to 8 minutes in order to exchange it for a larger one.
“Sterck & Dufour provide further evidence about future-oriented capacities in chimpanzees, who can learn to hold a desired cookie for up to 8 minutes in order to exchange it for a larger one.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sterck & Dufour
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ R5.3. Continuity in animal competence · p. 45
Foresight may be severely constrained without a capacity for recursive thought to generate content.
“For example, foresight may be severely constraint without a capacity for recursive thought to generate content (Corballis 2007; Suddendorf & Corballis 1997).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Corballis 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Suddendorf & Corballis 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ R5.4. The future of animal studies of mental time travel · p. 46
Studying what is unique about the human mind and what is not can inform us about the evolution of the human mind.
“Another good reason to study what is unique about the human mind, and what is not, is that this can in various ways inform us about the evolution of the human mind (Suddendorf 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suddendorf 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ R5.2. New data on animal foresight · p. 45
The distinction between recall and recognition is not equivalent to the distinction between episodic and semantic memory.
“However, the distinction between recall and recognition is not equivalent to the distinction between episodic and semantic memory (e.g., Wheeler et al. 1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wheeler et al. 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ R5.2. New data on animal foresight · p. 45
Gradual change in preference from four pieces of dates to one piece would not necessarily be the behavior we would predict from mental time travel.
“We would add that gradual change in preference from four pieces of dates to one piece would not necessarily be the behavior we would predict from mental time travel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ R5.2. New data on animal foresight · p. 44
Nevertheless this experiment does show flexibility beyond that expected of a purely instinctive behavior.
“Nevertheless this experiment does show flexibility beyond that expected of a purely instinctive behavior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ R6. Mental time travel and evolutionary psychology · p. 47
Primate social intelligence is not almost equally developed as that of humans.
“Although we agree that primate social intelligence is very impressive, we do not think it is 'almost equally developed' as that of humans (e.g., consider the scale of human cooperation).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given§ R6. Mental time travel and evolutionary psychology · p. 47
The reminiscence bump was evident across the cultural groups tested.
“Nonetheless, the reminiscence bump was evident across the cultural groups tested.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ R6. Mental time travel and evolutionary psychology · p. 47
By 1.5 million years ago, our ancestors already had some mental time travel ability.
“The archaeological record indicates to us that by 1.5 million years ago our ancestors already had some mental time travel ability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ R6. Mental time travel and evolutionary psychology · p. 47
There are viable explanations that do not demand ascribing higher mental capacity to modern apes and our common ancestor with apes than is currently accepted.
“we remain agnostic about which, if any, of these accounts is correct, and instead discuss them to show that there are viable explanations that do not demand that we ascribe higher mental capacity to modern apes, and to our common ancestor with apes, than is currently accepted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ R6. Mental time travel and evolutionary psychology · p. 47
Only with the capacity for mental time travel could human cultures have invented such fundamental characteristics of civilization as trade, law, and religion.
“we maintain that only with the capacity for mental time travel could human cultures have invented such fundamental characteristics of civilization as trade, law, and religion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Humans can travel mentally in time.
- Interpretationreasoning§ R6. Mental time travel and evolutionary psychology · p. 47
Mental time travel evolved in the genus Homo.
“We suggest that mental time travel evolved in the genus Homo (the Lower Paleolithic emergence hypothesis ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ R6. Mental time travel and evolutionary psychology · p. 47
Cultural change can be induced by foresight.
“Although this demonstrates that cultural change can be induced by foresight, the failures of these attempts also illustrate that foresight is not fortune telling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 187
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 279
May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 3. Mental time travel in nonhuman animals? · p. 5There is so far no use of tense, nor any sense that trained apes are telling stories about previous or anticipated episodes.
“There is so far no use of tense, nor any sense that the animals are telling stories about previous or anticipated episodes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Martin Bru ¨ne and Ute Bru ¨ne-Cohrs · p. 20Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder suffer from intrusive thoughts and over-ascribe meaning to prevent future negative events, which often precludes effective future action planning.
“Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) suffer from intrusive thoughts to which they often over-ascribe meaning in order to prevent future (negative) events, perhaps as a consequence of the tendency to excessively reflect upon their cognitive processes (Janeck et al. 2003). This often precludes effective future action planning in that patients with OCD are caught in repetitive behaviours”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Janeck et al. 2003
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Is mental time travel a frame-of-reference issue? · p. 18At around the fourth birthday, a set of new competences synchronously develop, including theory of mind, time comprehension, delay of gratification, temporal organization of conflicting desires, and anticipation of future needs.
“We were able to show in a sample of 170 children that at around the fourth birthday a set of new competences synchronously develop. They include: a theory of mind as tested in a false-belief paradigm; time comprehension as demonstrated by predicting and comparing the running times of hourglasses; and the abilities to delay gratification, to temporally organize conflicting desires, and to anticip”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bischof-Köhler 2000
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Martin Bru ¨ne and Ute Bru ¨ne-Cohrs · p. 19In Alzheimer's disease, loss of episodic and prospective memory is profound even in preclinical stages, and this deterioration is associated with a progressive cholinergic deficit.
“In Alzheimer's disease (AD), for example, the loss of episodic and prospective memory is profound, even in preclinical stages (Jones et al. 2006), and this functional deterioration is associated with a progressive cholinergic deficit commencing in the nucleus basalis of Meynert.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jones et al. 2006
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Martin Bru ¨ne and Ute Bru ¨ne-Cohrs · p. 20AD patients show a temporally graded memory loss with more remote memories better preserved, whereas semantic dementia patients show the reversed gradient, and fv-FTD patients show no temporal gradient.
“AD patients typically show a temporally graded memory loss with more remote memories being better preserved than more recent ones, whereas patients with semantic dementia (SD) involving the anterior temporal pole show the reversed gradient. However, patients with a frontal variant of FTD (fv-FTD) do not show any temporal gradient of episodic memory deficits (Piolino et al. 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Piolino et al. 2003
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Is mental time travel a frame-of-reference issue? · p. 18Mental time travel and theory of mind develop at the same stage both phylogenetically and ontogenetically.
“Mental time travel and theory of mind develop, both phyloand ontogenetically, at the same stage.”
- Also stated in: § Is mental time travel a frame-of-reference issue? · p. 18 · boosted
“We were able to show in a sample of 170 children that at around the fourth birthday a set of new competences synchronously develop.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bischof-Köhler 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Is mental time travel a frame-of-reference issue? · p. 18 · boosted
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Martin Bru ¨ne and Ute Bru ¨ne-Cohrs · p. 19In Korsakoff's syndrome, episodic memory deficits may lead to a complete loss of personal history, and patients confabulate.
“in full-blown Korsakoff's syndrome - which may develop in conditions associated with a severe deficiency of vitamin B1 (in Western societies, most often chronic alcoholism) episodic memory deficits may lead to a complete loss of personal history. Even more pronounced than in AD, patients with Korsakoff's syndrome 'make up' their personal history, referred to as producing confabulations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sacks 1985
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Valerie A. Carr a and Indre V. Viskontas b · p. 21The medial temporal lobe, particularly the hippocampus, is implicated in encoding and retrieval of episodic memories and may also play an important role in future event construction.
“The MTL, and in particular the hippocampus, has been repeatedly implicated in the encoding and retrieval of episodic memories (for review, see Davachi 2006), and recent evidence indicates that this region may also play an important role in future event construction (Addis et al. 2007; Hassabis et al. 2007; Okuda et al. 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Davachi 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Addis et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hassabis et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Valerie A. Carr a and Indre V. Viskontas b · p. 21In an fMRI study, the dentate gyrus and CA3 field were selectively active during episodic memory formation, whereas the subiculum was active during retrieval.
“Results show that the dentate gyrus and CA3 field were selectively active during episodic memory formation, whereas the subiculum was active during retrieval of the study episode.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eldridge et al. 2005
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Mental time travel in the rat: Dissociation of recall and familiarity · p. 24Intact rats efficiently 'answer' a question about where an object was in a given context by seeking out that object, and this ability cannot be reduced to a time-dependent process such as trace decay.
“Intact rats efficiently 'answer' such a question by seeking out object B (Eacott et al. 2005), and it cannot be claimed that such ability can be reduced to a time-dependent process such as trace decay”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eacott et al. 2005
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 35The chimpanzees had not previously succeeded in a planning-like task that required them to bring in a tool, and they never had to bring the tool during training.
“the animals had not previously succeeded in a planning-like task that required them bring in a tool, and also never had to bring the tool during training”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ Michael C. Corballis · p. 1In a dynamic world, mechanisms allowing prediction of future situations can provide a selective advantage.
“In a dynamic world, mechanisms allowing prediction of future situations can provide a selective advantage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 1. Introduction · p. 1Past and future mental time travel share phenomenological characteristics and activate similar parts of the brain.
“Past and future travels share phenomenological characteristics and activate similar parts of the brain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Michael C. Corballis · p. 1Mental time travel allows humans not only to go back in time, but also to foresee, plan, and shape virtually any specific future event.
“The most flexible is episodic memory, which we suggest is part of a more general faculty of mental time travel that allows us not only to go back in time, but also to foresee, plan, and shape virtually any specific future event.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Michael C. Corballis · p. 1The emergence of mental time travel in evolution was a crucial step towards our current success.
“We maintain that the emergence of mental time travel in evolution was a crucial step towards our current success.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisereasoning§ 1. Introduction · p. 1Organisms that can pick up on significant regularities and act in tune with them have an advantage over those that do not.
“The world is dynamic, and organisms that can pick up on significant regularities (e.g., fluctuations in food availability) and act in tune with them (e.g., being in the right place at the right time) have an advantage over those that do not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ 1. Introduction · p. 1Some species have evolved behavioral predispositions to exploit significant long-term regularities through natural selection.
“Through natural selection, some species have evolved behavioral predispositions to exploit significant long-term regularities (e.g., seasonal variations).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1. Introduction · p. 1Many organisms actively influence their own futures by creating an environment that suits their needs (niche-construction).
“Many organisms actively influence their own futures by creating an environment that suits their needs (socalled niche-construction, Odling-Smee et al. 2003), such as when a beaver dams a stream.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Odling-Smee et al. 2003
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2.1. Toward a definition of mental time travel · p. 4The crux of mental time travel lies in its role in enhancing biological fitness in the future, so mental time travel into the past is subsidiary to our ability to imagine future scenarios.
“If this argument is correct, then the crux of mental time travel lies in its role in enhancing biological fitness in the future, so that mental time travel into the past is subsidiary to our ability to imagine future scenarios.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisereasoning§ 1. Introduction · p. 2Top-down mediation offers the opportunity for representations decoupled from the immediate input to drive action flexibly and independently.
“Top-down mediation offers the opportunity for representations decoupled from the immediate input to drive action flexibly and independently.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.1. Toward a definition of mental time travel · p. 3One can mentally revisit an event without accurate information as to what, where, and when, and conversely one can know what, where, and when something happened without remembering the event itself.
“Personal experience, as well as research on false memories, show that one can mentally revisit an event without accurate information as to what, where, and when, and conversely one can know what, where, and when something happened (e.g., one's birth) without remembering the event itself (Suddendorf & Busby 2003b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suddendorf & Busby 2003b
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2.1. Toward a definition of mental time travel · p. 3The www criterion is neither necessary nor sufficient for mental time travel.
“However, although useful, the www criterion is neither necessary nor sufficient for mental time travel.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ 1. Introduction · p. 1Future-oriented mechanisms vary in flexibility, and relatively inflexible mechanisms will often suffice.
“However, futureoriented mechanisms vary in flexibility, and relatively inflexible mechanisms will often suffice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ 1. Introduction · p. 1The ultimate evolutionary advantage of mental time travel lies with the capacity to access the future.
“Nevertheless, there is growing recognition that mental time travel into the past and future are related, and that the ultimate evolutionary advantage must lie with the capacity to access the future (Dudai & Carruthers 2005a; Suddendorf & Busby 2003b; 2005; Suddendorf & Corballis 1997; Tulving 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Dudai & Carruthers 2005a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Suddendorf & Busby 2003b; 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Suddendorf & Corballis 1997
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 1. Introduction · p. 1Present behavior can increase or decrease an individual's future survival chances.
“Since present behavior can increase or decrease an individual's future survival chances, one might expect many species to have evolved anticipatory capacities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 1. Introduction · p. 2Mental time travel is the most flexible of memory-based systems, and the most recently evolved.
“We argue that mental time travel is the most flexible of those memorybased systems, and the most recently evolved.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisereasoning§ 2.1. Toward a definition of mental time travel · p. 3Episodic memory is about reconstructing particularities of specific events that have happened to the individual, not about regularities.
“Episodic memory is not about regularities , but about reconstructing particularities of specific events that have happened to the individual.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 2.1. Toward a definition of mental time travel · p. 3Episodic memory provides access to the personally experienced event, rather than just the knowledge extracted from the event.
“Episodic memory, in contrast to semantic memory, provides access to the personally experienced event, rather than just the knowledge extracted from the event.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 2. A taxonomy of future-oriented cognition · p. 2Semantic memory contains general knowledge, allowing learning in one context to be voluntarily transferred to another.
“Semantic memory contains general knowledge, allowing learning in one context to be voluntarily transferred to another.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ 1. Introduction · p. 2Organisms may have sophisticated mechanisms to track temporal information and yet inflexible action systems, and vice versa.
“Organisms may have sophisticated mechanisms to track temporal information and yet inflexible action systems, and vice versa.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Premisereasoning§ 2.1. Toward a definition of mental time travel · p. 3There is a distinction between merely knowing that some event will occur and mentally creating an event.
“Again, though, there is a distinction between merely knowing that some event will occur, such as that the sun will set, and mentally creating an event, such as a sunset actually experienced, with gradual fading of light, and the blue flash on the horizon as the last image of the sun disappears.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ 2.1. Toward a definition of mental time travel · p. 3Mental time travel is a generative process, incorporating known elements but arranged in particular ways.
“This means that mental time travel is a generative process, incorporating known elements but arranged in particular ways to create the experience of events that are actually occurring.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 1. Introduction · p. 2Perceptual systems differ in the robustness of their tracking and storage of information.
“Perceptual systems differ in the robustness of their tracking (e.g., use of single versus multiple perceptual channels to track significant aspects of the environment) and storage of information (e.g., knowing what is currently where).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2. A taxonomy of future-oriented cognition · p. 2In humans, declarative memories are conscious and at least partly verbalizable.
“In humans, these memories are conscious and at least partly verbalizable (Tulving 1985; 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tulving 1985; 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 2.1. Toward a definition of mental time travel · p. 4There is as yet no agreement as to the conditions defining phenomenological awareness, even in humans.
“It is conceivable that neurophysiological criteria may eventually suffice, but there is as yet no agreement as to the conditions defining phenomenological awareness, even in humans.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 2.1. Toward a definition of mental time travel · p. 3Mental reconstruction of past events and construction of future ones may have been responsible for the concept of time itself and the understanding of continuity between past and future.
“The mental reconstruction of past events and construction of future ones may have been responsible for the concept of time itself, and the understanding of a continuity between past and future.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Introduction · p. 1Many species might have evolved anticipatory capacities.
“Since present behavior can increase or decrease an individual's future survival chances, one might expect many species to have evolved anticipatory capacities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ 2.1. Toward a definition of mental time travel · p. 3Mental time travel cannot be defined in terms of the veracity of the content.
“This means that mental time travel cannot be defined in terms of the veracity of the content.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.1. Toward a definition of mental time travel · p. 3False memories have been widely documented and are readily created in the laboratory.
“False memories have been widely documented (e.g., Loftus & Ketcham 1994) and are readily created in the laboratory (e.g., Roediger & McDermott 1995).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Loftus & Ketcham 1994
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Roediger & McDermott 1995
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1. Introduction · p. 1Humans have in general been extraordinarily successful in foreseeing, planning, and shaping the future.
“Though we may often get it wrong, humans have in general been extraordinarily successful in foreseeing, planning, and shaping the future, and indeed allowing us to influence the earth itself in extraordinary but not always benevolent ways (Dawkins 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dawkins 2000
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisereasoning§ 2.1. Toward a definition of mental time travel · p. 3Based on previous experiences, humans can imagine specific events in the future including particularities that characterized past events.
“Based on previous experiences, we can imagine specific events in the future, including the sorts of particularities that have characterized events in the past.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ 1. Introduction · p. 2The link between perceptual and action systems can be direct (bottom-up) or top-down, mediated by internal representations.
“Further, the link between the two can be direct, or bottom-up , when perception of a stimulus triggers a response, or they can be top-down , mediated by internal representations (i.e., declarative memory).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 2.1. Toward a definition of mental time travel · p. 4The crucial selective advantage mental time travel provides is flexibility in novel situations and the versatility to develop and adopt strategic long-term plans to suit individual selected goals.
“We postulate that the crucial selective advantage mental time travel provides is flexibility in novel situations and the versatility to develop and adopt strategic longterm plans to suit individual selected goals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 3.1. Mental time travel into the past · p. 6Action with the future in mind provides increased selective advantage and is hence visible to evolution.
“We argue that it is action with the future in mind that provides increased selective advantage and is hence visible to evolution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.1. Mental time travel into the past · p. 6The information listed in Table 1 may be known rather than remembered.
“The information listed in Table 1 may be known rather than remembered.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.1. Mental time travel into the past · p. 5Scrub jays seem to know what, where, and when food was cached, thus apparently meeting the www criterion.
“Scrub jays seem to know what has been cached, where it was cached, and when it was cached, thus apparently meeting the www criterion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 3.1. Mental time travel into the past · p. 5The www criterion need not imply true episodic memory, in part because there need not be implications about autonoetic consciousness.
“As noted earlier, however, investigators have used the term 'episodic-like memory' in acknowledgment that the www criterion need not imply true episodic memory, in part because there need not be any implications about autonoetic consciousness (Clayton et al. 2003; Emery & Clayton 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Clayton et al. 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Emery & Clayton 2004
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.1. Mental time travel into the past · p. 6Performance that depends on time since an event may rely on strengths of memory traces, which fade in time, and may provide a direct cue without implying mental travel through time.
“For example, performance that depends on time since an event may rely on the strengths of memory traces, which fade in time, and may therefore provide a direct cue without implying mental travel through time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 2.2. Evidence for continuity of past and future mental time travel · p. 4There is a fundamental causal asymmetry: one cannot know the future as one knows the past.
“There is a fundamental causal asymmetry, and one simply cannot know the future as one knows the past.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 2.2. Evidence for continuity of past and future mental time travel · p. 4Mental time travel offers the ultimate step in adaptation to the future by allowing us to foresee unique events.
“In allowing us to foresee unique events, mental time travel offers the ultimate step in adaptation to the future.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.2. Mental time travel into the future · p. 7Caching strategy rests on some memory capacities and suggests orientation to future consumption, but need not imply the animal envisages that future or explicitly plans for it.
“This strategy rests on some memory capacities and suggests orientation to future consumption, but it need not imply that the animal actually envisages that future, or even explicitly plans for it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.2. Mental time travel into the future · p. 7Advantageous behavior can lead to evolutionary change and can become instinctive as descendants face selection pressure for reliable, less resource-intensive shortcuts.
“Advantageous behavior can lead to evolutionary change (Bateson 2004) and can become instinctive as descendants of animals displaying the behavior face selection pressure for reliable, less resource-intensive shortcuts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bateson 2004
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8The other two control animals performed identically to two animals in Experiment 1.
“The other two performed identically to two animals in Experiment 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suddendorf 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 4.1. The stage · p. 9To entertain a future event one needs imagination, some kind of representational space in our mind for the imaginary performance.
“To entertain a future event one needs imagination - some kind of representational space in our mind for the imaginary performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 7Superficially, the Bischof-Köhler hypothesis cannot be correct, since many species act to secure future needs.
“Superficially, at least, this hypothesis cannot be correct, since many species act to secure future needs, as illustrated by the caching of food.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8Animals that are not capable of conceiving of future drive and need states would have little reason to concern themselves with a remote future, as all they would care about is satisfaction of current needs.
“Animals that are not capable of conceiving of future drive and need states would have little reason to concern themselves with a remote future, as all they would care about is satisfaction of current needs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 4. Components of human mental time travel · p. 9Flexible anticipation of particular events is no easy feat and may involve a suite of cognitive abilities that may not be available to animals or to young children.
“One reason to question whether mental time travel is possible in nonhuman animals is that flexible anticipation of particular events is no easy feat and may involve a suite of cognitive abilities that may not be available to animals or to young children (Suddendorf & Busby 2003b; Suddendorf & Corballis 1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Suddendorf & Busby 2003b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Suddendorf & Corballis 1997
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ 4. Components of human mental time travel · p. 9To evolve a flexible anticipation system, many cognitive components may need to be in place to achieve a level of accuracy that provides a selective advantage sufficient to compensate for the enormous expense of cognitive resources.
“To evolve a flexible anticipation system, many cognitive components may need to be in place to achieve a level of accuracy that provides a selective advantage sufficient to compensate for the enormous expense of cognitive resources.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationcitation§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8Contrary to what the authors claimed, association cannot be ruled out.
“Thus, contrary to what the authors claimed, association cannot be ruled out (Suddendorf 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suddendorf 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8Living in fission-fusion societies, as modern chimpanzees do, may have selected for an increased capacity to monitor across time and space the comings and goings of other group members.
“It has been argued that living in fissionfusion societies, as modern chimpanzees do, may have selected for an increased capacity to monitor across time and space the comings and goings of other group members (Barrett et al. 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Barrett et al. 2003
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.2. Mental time travel into the future · p. 7Prevention of pilfering is a common adaptive problem for species that store food, and various strategies have evolved to deal with it.
“Prevention of pilfering is a common adaptive problem for species that store food, and various strategies have evolved to deal with it (for a review, see Dally et al. 2006a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dally et al. 2006a
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.1. The stage · p. 9To represent the future, the stage has to allow combination of recently presented material and information stored in long-term memory, and must allow offline processing.
“To represent the future, the stage has to allow combination not only of recently presented material, but also of information stored in long-term memory. It must allow offline processing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 7Children anticipate future needs by around age 4.
“One study suggests that children anticipate future needs by around age 4 (Suddendorf & Busby 2005), and the challenge is now to document its development in more detail and to test nonhuman species.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suddendorf & Busby 2005
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8There is a range of evidence that great apes can imagine alternative states of the world and may hence offer a link between animal and human minds.
“There is a range of evidence that great apes can imagine alternative states of the world (see sect. 4.1) and may hence offer a link between animal and human minds (for a review, see Suddendorf & Whiten 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suddendorf & Whiten 2001
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.1. The stage · p. 9Offline replay during sleep may be involved in consolidation of declarative memories in the hippocampus.
“Offline replay during sleep may be involved in consolidation of declarative memories in the hippocampus (Kali & Dayan 2004; Wilson & McNaughton 1994).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kali & Dayan 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wilson & McNaughton 1994
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 7One has to be capable of conceiving having different future needs, such as imagining being thirsty when currently quenched.
“First, therefore, one has to be capable of conceiving having different future needs, such as imagining being thirsty when currently quenched.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationcitation§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8A substantial body of comparative data is required before it can be concluded that any trait is uniquely human.
“We admit that a substantial body of comparative data is required before it can be concluded that any trait is uniquely human (Hauser et al. 2002).”
- Also stated in: § R5.3. Continuity in animal competence · p. 45 · plain
“We also stated that 'a substantial body of comparative data is required before it can be concluded that any trait is uniquely human' (target article, sect. 3.3, para. 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hauser et al. 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § R5.3. Continuity in animal competence · p. 45 · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8It would be a serious challenge to many humans' anthropocentric worldview and would have profound moral implications if other species have mental time travel.
“It would be a serious challenge to many humans' anthropocentric worldview and would have profound moral implications (Suddendorf & Busby 2003a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suddendorf & Busby 2003a
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitation§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8The final control condition was not given to the successful animals of Experiments 1 to 3, but to a new group of four animals.
“However, this control condition was not given to the successful animals of Experiments 1 to 3, but to a new group of four animals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suddendorf 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8Two of the new control animals never brought the tool back and hence could never have experienced the reward that may have facilitated performance in the previous studies.
“Two of these never brought the tool back and hence could never have experienced the reward that may have facilitated performance in the previous studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8If the same animal were to pass variations of such tests across different needs and contexts, the Bischof-Köhler hypothesis would become increasingly untenable.
“If the same animal were to pass variations of such tests across different needs (e.g., hunger, thirst, temperature) and contexts (locations, time-intervals), the Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis would become increasingly untenable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.1. The stage · p. 9Dreaming or day-dreaming may be regarded as a form of 'scenario building' that social mammals may have evolved to allow practice/play without suffering consequences.
“In fact, dreaming or day-dreaming may be regarded as a form of 'scenario building' that social mammals may have evolved to allow practice / play without suffering consequences (Alexander 1989).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Alexander 1989
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 4.1. The stage · p. 9Although non-lingual species may not have a phonological loop, they may very well have an image-based system (visuospatial sketchpad).
“Although non-lingual species may not have anything like the inner voice and inner ear (i.e., the phonological loop), they may very well have an image-based system (i.e., the visuospatial sketchpad).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8The same tools were appropriate over trials, so apes could have just learned to always return with these same tools.
“The same tools were appropriate over trials, so apes could have just learned to always return with these same tools.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8Given the selective importance of future-oriented behavior, species are likely to have evolved a wealth of different mechanisms.
“Given the selective importance of future-oriented behavior, species are likely to have evolved a wealth of different mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 7Such future-oriented behaviors may typically be largely instinctive, and experience may only allow changes within specific domain parameters.
“As noted, though, such behaviors may typically be largely instinctive, and experience may only allow changes within specific domain parameters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8At present, there is no need to abandon the null hypothesis, but neither are we in a position to firmly conclude that other animals do not possess this capacity.
“At present, there is no need to abandon the null hypothesis, but neither are we in a position to firmly conclude that other animals do not possess this capacity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationcitation§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8Species that can ponder what has happened and speculate about what might happen in the future would require fundamentally different welfare considerations.
“Those species that can be shown to ponder what has happened, and to speculate about what might happen in the future, would require fundamentally different welfare considerations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8Our closest surviving relatives, the great apes, may be expected to have precursors of the human ability, such as foresight limited to serving current needs.
“Our closest surviving relatives, the great apes, may be expected to have precursors of the human ability (e.g., foresight limited to serving current needs).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.3. The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis · p. 8It is possible that antecedents of mental time travel had evolved in the common great ape ancestor.
“It is possible, then, that antecedents of mental time travel had evolved in the common great ape ancestor.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14One possibility is that extensive foresight evolved first in the context of throwing, as hominins faced different predators and prey in the savannah than they did in the trees.
“One possibility, then, is that extensive foresight evolved first in the context of throwing, as hominins faced different predators and prey in the savannah than they did in the trees.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14Cultures have evolved complex moral systems that judge actions as right or wrong partly based on what the actor could or could not have reasonably foreseen to be the future consequences of the act.
“Cultures have evolved complex moral systems that judge actions as right or wrong partly based on what the actor could or could not have reasonably foreseen to be the future consequences of the act.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 4.2. The playwright · p. 9Some nonhuman species appear to have declarative memory that could serve this function.
“As noted earlier, some nonhuman species appear to have declarative memory that could serve this function.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14Human future-directed behavior can go beyond individual needs and may carry a concern for the planet and its inhabitants.
“Our futuredirected behavior can even go beyond merely individual needs and may carry a concern for the planet itself, along with its inhabitants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 13The now-standard taxonomy of human memory can be extended to incorporate variations in the degree of flexibility each system provides for the future.
“The now-standard taxonomy of human memory, we suggest, can be extended to incorporate variations in the degree of flexibility each system provides for the future.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14Great apes do hurl objects, but with little precision.
“Great apes do hurl objects, but with little precision.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.1. The stage · p. 9Only great apes have so far provided some evidence for secondary representation in all of these areas and may therefore have the mental stage to imagine past or future events.
“A review of the literature found that only our closest relatives, the great apes, have so far provided some evidence for secondary representation in all of these areas (Suddendorf & Whiten 2001; 2003; Whiten & Suddendorf, in press) and may therefore have the mental stage to imagine past or future events.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Suddendorf & Whiten 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Suddendorf & Whiten 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Whiten & Suddendorf, in press
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5. Some qualifications · p. 13Humans appear to be less constrained and can link virtually anything to anything else across time.
“Humans appear to be less constrained and can (though may not) link virtually anything to anything else across time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 5. Some qualifications · p. 13Episodes are actively constructed and are prone to error.
“As pointed out earlier, episodes are actively constructed and are prone to error.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 5. Some qualifications · p. 13Mental time travel often involves only the smallest snippets of events.
“Also, mental time travel often involves only the smallest snippets of events.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14Bipedal hominins in the deforested savannah may have relied increasingly on throwing stones at predators, as well as using them to bring down prey and cut up carcasses.
“Bipedal hominins in the deforested savannah may have relied increasingly on throwing stones at predators (e.g., Calvin 1982), as well as using them to bring down prey and cut up carcasses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Calvin 1982
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 4.2. The playwright · p. 9To generate content, imaginary events need a script or narrative, requiring access to a declarative database.
“To generate content, imaginary events need a script or narrative. This requires access to a declarative database - that is, stored information that is not stimulus bound, but can be made available top-down.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14Law, education, religion, and many other fundamental aspects of human culture are deeply dependent on our shared ability to reconstruct past and imagine future events.
“Law, education, religion, and many other fundamental aspects of human culture are deeply dependant on our shared ability to reconstruct past and imagine future events.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 5. Some qualifications · p. 13As one matures, one accumulates more semantic facts, and fewer things are surprising.
“As one matures, one also accumulates more semantic facts, and fewer things are surprising.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14Humans can identify future threats to the world, whether of their own doing or external origin, forecast outcomes, and choose to act now to secure future needs.
“We can identify future threats to our world, be they of our own doing (e.g., the consequences of human-induced global warming) or of external origin (e.g., an asteroid on collision course with Earth). Humans can forecast the outcomes and choose to act now to secure future needs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.2. The playwright · p. 9To generate new content, one needs to be able to combine and recombine existing elements.
“To generate new content, however, one further needs to be able to combine and recombine existing elements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 13Today humans base much of their actions on anticipation of future events.
“Even if the initial adaptive advantage may have been small, it is clear that today humans base much of their actions on anticipation of future events, from preparing this weekend's escape to building wealth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14The fact that stone tools provide an archaeological record that other behaviors do not may skew our evaluation of their significance.
“The fact that stone tools provide us with an archaeological record that other behaviors do not may skew our evaluation of their significance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisereasoning§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 13Because behavior that increases future survival has a selective advantage, mechanisms for future-directed behavior are ubiquitous.
“Because behavior that increases future survival has a selective advantage, mechanisms for future-directed behavior are ubiquitous.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Behavior that increases future survival has a selective advantage.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14As perhaps the only species with such foresight, humans alone may be driven to consciously guide the planet into the future and be burdened with the responsibility of getting it right.
“As perhaps the only species with such foresight, humans alone may be driven to consciously guide the planet into the future (Dawkins 2000) and thus be burdened with the responsibility of getting it right.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dawkins 2000
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14Carrying rocks for use as missiles at some future point may have been vital, and a capacity to plan for this might have been strongly selected for.
“Carrying rocks for use as missiles at some future point may have been vital, and a capacity to plan for this might have been strongly selected for.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5. Some qualifications · p. 13Although semantic memory and prospection are phylogenetically older than episodic memory and prospection, mental time travel may vastly increase the nature and capacity of semantic future-oriented cognition.
“Thus, although we have argued that semantic memory and prospection are phylogenetically older than episodic memory and prospection, mental time travel may vastly increase the nature and capacity of semantic future-oriented cognition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.8. Components of successful mental time travel · p. 12Mental time travel requires a constellation of skills and is not simply an isolated capacity.
“In summary, the theater metaphor implies that mental time travel requires a constellation of skills and is not simply an isolated capacity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 13Foresight requires several sophisticated cognitive abilities, is resource-intensive and error-prone, and introduces new kinds of mental stress, including knowledge of inevitable death.
“This foresight requires several sophisticated cognitive abilities, is resource-intensive and error-prone, and introduces new kinds of mental stress, not least of which is the knowledge of inevitable death.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 13Mental time travel offers the ultimate level of flexibility, allowing voluntary anticipation of any particular event.
“Mental time travel offers the ultimate level of flexibility, allowing voluntary anticipation of any particular event.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Martin Bru ¨ne and Ute Bru ¨ne-Cohrs · p. 20Brain regions involved in future action planning and episodic/prospective memory retrieval are overactive in OCD, which could be interpreted as a mental time travel overshoot.
“Notably, those brain regions involved in future action planning, as well as episodic and prospective memory retrieval, including the ACC, the prefrontal cortex, and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, have been found overactive in patients with OCD; and this could arguably be interpreted as an MTT overshoot (Bru ¨ne 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brüne 2006
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ The continuum of 'looking forward,' and paradoxical requirements from memory · p. 17Foresight could be seen as a continual phenomenon of different levels of complexity and thus possibly present in animals, though to a lower degree than in humans.
“If foresight is indeed derived from associations of varying degree of complexity (which we might not always be aware of), this would support the proposal that foresight could be seen as a continual phenomenon of different levels of complexity and thus possibly present in animals, though to a lower degree than in humans.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Nonhuman animals can use simple predictions based on associations, learning from experience and applying it in the future.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14Our ancestors may have competed with an array of other bipedal species and perhaps simply outsmarted them, contributing to their demise.
“Our ancestors may have competed with an array of other bipedal species that once graced this planet, and perhaps simply outsmarted them, contributing to their demise (Suddendorf 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suddendorf 2004
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14The use of fire is evident by 400,000 years ago and may well have been used much earlier.
“Consider, for example, the use of fire, which is also evident by 400,000 years ago (e.g., Boaz et al. 2004) and may well have been used much earlier.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boaz et al. 2004
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ The continuum of 'looking forward,' and paradoxical requirements from memory · p. 17Animals require foresight that is considerably less complex and rich in scenarios than that required by humans.
“it is easy to see that animals would require foresight that is considerably less complex and rich in scenarios than that required by humans.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14Humans may be the only species capable of mental time travel because the others competing in our niche have become or have been made extinct.
“We may be the only species capable of mental time travel because the others competing in our niche have become (or have been made) extinct.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Martin Bru ¨ne and Ute Bru ¨ne-Cohrs · p. 19Patients with Korsakoff's syndrome are confined to the present despite apparently intact imagination.
“although the patients' imagination is apparently left intact, they are confined to the present”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sacks 1985
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14This may have resulted in a runaway social competition between and within groups towards greater intelligence, and enhanced abilities for both cooperation and deception.
“This may have resulted in a runaway social competition between (and within) groups towards greater intelligence, and enhanced abilities for both cooperation and deception.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14Social rather than ecological pressures drove the evolution of intelligence, not only in humans, but in primates more generally.
“It has been suggested that social rather than ecological pressures drove the evolution of intelligence, not only in humans, but in primates more generally (Humphrey 1976).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Humphrey 1976
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14This suggestion that humans played a role in displacing other hominins is in line with recorded human history and other human characteristics.
“This suggestion that humans played a role in displacing other hominins is in line with recorded human history in that human groups perpetually compete with each other and often violently displace other groups, as well as with various other human characteristics, such as our unique obsessions with inter-group competitive play (e.g., sports).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14These may have included the ability to entertain alternative future scenarios (mental time travel), to read others' minds (theory of mind), and to communicate (language).
“These may have included the ability to entertain alternative future scenarios (mental time travel), to read others' minds (theory of mind), and to communicate (language).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14Planning capacities could have been selected for as the incidental use of fire gave way to maintenance of fire and, finally, to the making of fire for more controlled and deliberate purposes.
“Planning capacities could have been selected for as the incidental use of fire gave way to maintenance of fire and, finally, to the making of fire for more controlled and deliberate purposes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Is mental time travel a frame-of-reference issue? · p. 18Humans have access to a higher level of behavioral organization that allows them to conceive of a temporal axis and manage competing desires, overriding instant gratification.
“Humans may still behave the same way, but they have access to a higher level of behavioral organization. They are able to conceive of a temporal axis analogous to space that provides a buffer on which competing desires, including future ones, may be shifted, postponed, adjourned, delayed, or anticipated, according to their expected consummatory value and success, thus overriding the imperative of”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Animals, when experiencing conflicting needs, cannot but follow the strongest need and suppress the others.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14A potential explanation is that once early hominins obtained a certain level of ecological dominance, they were faced with increased competition from their own species.
“A potential explanation, suggested by Alexander and colleagues (Alexander 1989; Flinn et al. 2005), is that once early hominins obtained a certain level of 'ecological dominance,' perhaps partly through technological advances as discussed earlier, they were faced with increased competition from their own species - 'humans uniquely became their own principal hostile force of nature' (Alexander 1989”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Alexander 1989
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Flinn et al. 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 15An account emphasizing intra-species or intra-genus competition may exaggerate the importance of a single factor.
“Like the 'just-so stories' about throwing or fire, an account emphasizing intra-species or intra-genus competition may exaggerate the importance of a single factor.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Is mental time travel a frame-of-reference issue? · p. 19Theory of mind can be interpreted as frame-of-reference awareness.
“Obviously, theory of mind can also be interpreted as frame-ofreference awareness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 15Such catastrophic events may well have produced bottlenecks in evolutionary history where social competition was of far less import than ecological factors and cooperation.
“Such events may well have produced bottlenecks in evolutionary history where social competition was of far less import than ecological factors and cooperation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14Much of what humans recall and foresee has to do with 'who did what to whom, when, where, and why'.
“As noted earlier, much of what humans recall and foresee has to do with 'who did what to whom, when, where, and why' (Pinker 2003, p. 27).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pinker 2003
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14One problem for such an account is to explain why the cognitive arms race seems to have persisted longer in humans than in other primates, resulting in apparently unique cognitive skills, including, perhaps, mental time travel.
“One problem for such an account is to explain why the cognitive arms race seems to have persisted longer in humans than in other primates, resulting in apparently unique cognitive skills, including, perhaps, mental time travel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Is mental time travel a frame-of-reference issue? · p. 18Frame-of-reference awareness is the common mechanism underlying these competences.
“We consider 'frame-of-reference awareness' to be that mechanism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The potential for frame-of-reference awareness is beyond the grasp of even the great apes.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationcitation§ The continuum of 'looking forward,' and paradoxical requirements from memory · p. 17Simple associations, when accumulated, could serve as the basis for phenomena as complex as foresight simulation.
“while simple associations are merely atomic elements, when accumulated, they could serve the basis for phenomena as complex as foresight simulation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bar et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Nonhuman animals can use simple predictions based on associations, learning from experience and applying it in the future.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14These victories in gaining control of the natural world may only have been side effects of a quite different evolutionary arms race.
“Yet, these victories in gaining control of the natural world may only have been side effects of a quite different evolutionary arms race.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 15Claiming that the hostile forces of nature turned into 'relative trivialities' probably underestimates the selective pressure of catastrophic environmental changes.
“Claiming that the hostile forces of nature turned into 'relative trivialities' (Alexander 1989) probably underestimates the selective pressure of catastrophic environmental changes such as ice ages, volcanic eruptions, and meteorite impacts on life in general.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Alexander 1989
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 15Plausible accounts exist that can explain why humans may have capacities, such as mental time travel, that other species do not have.
“Rather than endorsing one or the other scenario, we present them here merely to make the point that plausible accounts exist that can explain why humans may have capacities, such as mental time travel, that other species do not have.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 15Darwinian continuity need not demand greater mental powers in nonhuman animals than is currently evident.
“Darwinian continuity need not demand greater mental powers in nonhuman animals than is currently evident.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Is mental time travel a frame-of-reference issue? · p. 18Foresight as such does not yet require frame-of-reference awareness; what matters is foresight of need states.
“Foresight as such, however, does not yet require frame-of-reference awareness. What really matters is foresight of need states, that is, of motivational frames of reference other than the ones shaping the present world view.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Randy L. Buckner · p. 20The capacity for mental exploration of future possibilities is extraordinarily well developed in humans, while forms of these abilities exist in other animal species.
“While forms of these abilities exist in other animal species, the capacity for mental exploration of future possibilities is extraordinarily well developed in humans.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ Is mental time travel a frame-of-reference issue? · p. 18Mental time travel unquestionably requires the ability to reflect upon frames of reference.
“Mental time travel unquestionably requires the ability to reflect upon frames of reference.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 6. Evolutionary considerations · p. 14This intra-genus competition may have ultimately been won by human groups because of continued advances in foresight, language, culture, and coordinated aggression, leaving humans as the sole survivors.
“This intra-genus competition may have ultimately been won by human groups because of continued advances in foresight, language, culture, and coordinated aggression, leaving us as the sole survivors of an extraordinary evolutionary arms race.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23The function of episodic memory is to accumulate stories that are relevant to recount in conversation.
“The function of episodic memory, in my view, is to accumulate stories that are relevant to recount in conversation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 22People who have higher visual imagery capacities generate more detailed representations of their personal past and future, and rate their representations of future events as being more emotional and meaningful.
“people who have higher visual imagery capacities generate more detailed representations of their personal past and future, and rate their representations of future events as being more emotional and meaningful”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites D'Argembeau & Van der Linden 2006
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 23Positive biases in representing the past and future probably help maintain a positive view of the self and foster optimism concerning one's personal future, which may promote physical and mental health.
“Positive biases in representing the past and future probably help maintain a positive view of the self and foster optimism concerning one's personal future, which may promote physical and mental health”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Taylor & Brown 1988
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 23Depressed individuals tend to generate fewer positive future events, while anxious individuals tend to generate more negative future experiences.
“depressed individuals tend to generate fewer positive future events, while anxious individuals tend to generate more negative future experiences”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites MacLeod & Byrne 1996
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 23Most people hold positive views of themselves and are more willing to consider information that bolsters their self-image than information that contradicts it.
“Most people hold positive views of themselves and are more willing to consider information that bolsters their selfimage than information that contradicts it”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baumeister 1998
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23Episodic memory is a unique endowment.
“Episodic memory is certainly a unique endowment”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 22The resulting representations can be highly selective, and the pieces of information that are encoded, maintained, and retrieved from memory in priority are those that are most relevant to an individual's goals, beliefs, and concerns.
“The resulting representations can therefore be highly selective, and the pieces of information that are encoded, maintained, and retrieved from memory in priority are those that are most relevant to an individual's goals, beliefs, and concerns”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Conway 2005
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 22Representations of emotional events induce significant modifications of emotional responses and feelings, and may therefore be used to regulate affective states.
“Representations of emotional events induce significant modifications of emotional responses and feelings (Damasio et al. 2000), and may therefore be used to regulate affective states”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Damasio et al. 2000
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisereasoning§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23In certain applications in which data are scarce and non-homogeneous, storing actual encountered examples, regardless of their representativeness, may be a viable strategy.
“in certain applications in which data are scarce and non-homogeneous, storing actual encountered examples, regardless of their representativeness, may be a viable strategy”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 22The use of mental simulations to regulate mood states is not always straightforward; people probably use rather complex strategies that may vary across situations.
“the use of mental simulations to regulate mood states is not always straightforward, however; people probably use rather complex strategies that may vary across situations”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23To delineate categories, it may be useful to remember borderline instances, as with support vectors.
“To delineate categories, it may be useful to remember borderline instances, as with support vectors”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cornuejols & Miclet 2002
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Valerie A. Carr a and Indre V. Viskontas b · p. 21The hippocampus is specialized for rapidly storing episodic memories, whereas the surrounding neocortex stores information about statistical regularities in the world.
“According to the CLS model, the hippocampus is specialized for rapidly storing episodic memories, whereas the surrounding neocortex stores information about the statistical regularities in the world.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites O'Reilly and Rudy (2001)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Emotional aspects of mental time travel · p. 22Negative memories remind people of their past errors and provide cues on how to avoid undesired outcomes or minimize their consequences, whereas positive memories remind people of their past accomplishments and provide cues on how to attain success.
“Negative memories remind people of their past errors and provide cues on how to avoid undesired outcomes or minimize their consequences, whereas positive memories remind people of their past accomplishments and provide cues on how to attain success”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23The Case-Based Reasoning technique aims at solving new problems by matching them with memorized known examples.
“The Case-Based Reasoning technique (Kolodner 1993) aims at solving new problems by matching them with memorized known examples”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kolodner 1993
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23Remembered episodes are exactly those that are worth telling.
“Remembered episodes are exactly those that are worth telling”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23People spend one fifth of their waking time in spontaneous conversation, and a significant share of this time is devoted to reporting past events.
“People spend one fifth of their waking time in spontaneous conversation (Dunbar 1998), and a significant share of this time is devoted to reporting past events”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Dunbar 1998
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Tannen 1984
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Eggins & Slade 1997
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23Such details represent a waste of storage and hinder and mislead retrieval matching.
“not only do such details represent a waste of storage, they also hinder and mislead retrieval matching”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23One crucial requirement is that reported stories must appear unexpected.
“One crucial requirement is that reported stories must appear unexpected”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dessalles, in press
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ The meaning of 'time' in episodic memory and mental time travel · p. 25Temporal information plays a central role in discussions of the nature of episodic memory and mental time travel.
“Temporal information plays a central role in discussions of the nature of episodic memory (EM) (e.g., Tulving 1972; 1984; 2002b) and mental time travel (MTT) (target article)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Tulving 1972
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Tulving 1984
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Tulving 2002b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23Episodic memory is an outgrowth of the language faculty.
“An alternative view is that EM is an outgrowth of the language faculty”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dessalles 2006
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ The meaning of 'time' in episodic memory and mental time travel · p. 25Among the different types of temporal information that humans and animals could process are temporal locations, temporal distances, and before-after relations and other relations of the order of events.
“Among the different types of temporal information that humans and animals could process are: when an event occurred (or is expected to occur) within some time pattern ('temporal locations'), how long ago an event occurred ('temporal distances'), and before-after relations and other relations of the order of events”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Friedman 1993
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Mental time travel in the rat: Dissociation of recall and familiarity · p. 25We cannot say with any confidence that this 'recall' in a rat was associated with the phenomenological experience that accompanies recall in humans.
“Of course, we cannot say with any confidence that this 'recall' in a rat was associated with the phenomenological experience that accompanies recall in humans”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23Eliciting interest through conversational stories is a high-stakes game; boring participants are rapidly ignored and may lose their friends.
“Eliciting interest through conversational stories is a high-stakes game. Boring participants are rapidly ignored and may lose their friends”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23If the primary purpose of storing episodes is to offer material for future recounting, then systematically remembering details such as time and space location makes perfect sense.
“If, as we claim, the primary purpose of storing episodes is to offer material for future recounting, then systematically remembering details such as time and space location makes perfect sense”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Mental time travel in the rat: Dissociation of recall and familiarity · p. 24Human episodic memory rarely codes when an event occurred, and humans are extremely poor at remembering when.
“human episodic memory rarely codes when, and even with all the advantages of verbal labels to help code such information (e.g., 'last Wednesday,' '19th March'), we are extremely poor at such memory”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Friedman 1993
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ The meaning of 'time' in episodic memory and mental time travel · p. 25Memory for time is often inaccurate, systematically distorted, and even inconsistent with remembering time in an integral way.
“memory for time is often inaccurate, systematically distorted, and even inconsistent with remembering time in an integral way”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Friedman 1993
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Mental time travel in the rat: Dissociation of recall and familiarity · p. 24In humans, the subjective feelings of knowing and remembering are associated with different neural systems and different patterns of performance when analysing ROC curves.
“in humans the subjective feelings of knowing and remembering are associated with different neural systems and different patterns of performance when analysing receiver operating curve (ROC) curves”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Yonelinas 1994
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Yonelinas et al. 1998
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23The interest of coincidentally encountering someone increases with the remoteness of the place and with the simplicity of that person, if she happens to be a celebrity or a close acquaintance.
“the interest of coincidentally encountering someone increases with the remoteness (and thus complexity) of the place and with the simplicity of that person, if she happens to be a celebrity or a close acquaintance”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23Interlocutors draw from their memory relevant episodes that they can relate to the current conversational topic and systematically try to recount them.
“Interlocutors draw from their memory relevant episodes that they can relate to the current conversational topic and they systematically try to recount them”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ Mental time travel in the rat: Dissociation of recall and familiarity · p. 24The essential difference between remembering and knowing about a past, personally experienced event lies in the subjective feeling associated with a memory, and this cannot be investigated in nonverbal animals.
“The essential difference between remembering and knowing about a past, personally experienced event lies in the subjective feeling associated with a memory, and clearly this cannot be investigated in nonverbal animals”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Storing events to retell them · p. 23In our species, those who know first or who can draw highly relevant events from their past experiences make potentially good allies.
“In our species, those who know first or who can draw highly relevant events from their past experiences make potentially good allies”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Mental time travel in the rat: Dissociation of recall and familiarity · p. 24Because the object was hidden, this ability must rely on recall, and not recognition memory.
“Because the object was hidden, this ability must rely on recall, and not recognition memory”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26The authors focus on a surprisingly narrow and problematic mechanism for foresight, namely, mental time travel.
“the authors focus on a surprisingly narrow and problematic mechanism for it, namely, mental time travel”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ Past and future, human and nonhuman, semantic / procedural and episodic · p. 27Procedural memory encodes instructions on what action to take whenever certain circumstances arise.
“procedural memory encodes instructions on what action to take whenever certain circumstances arise.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
Interpretationreasoning§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26If the authors' formulation were strictly true, one would be able to foresee only those events that one has episodic memory of.
“if it were strictly true, it would mean that one would be able to foresee only those events that one has episodic memory of”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26The Bayesian framework represents at a minimum a substantive counterexample to the framework suggested by the authors.
“But it represents, at a minimum, a substantive counterexample to the framework suggested by the authors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ The meaning of 'time' in episodic memory and mental time travel · p. 25Humans remember and anticipate times separately on multiple time scales.
“humans remember and anticipate times separately on multiple time scales”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone given§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26In the Bayesian framework, prediction is a fairly straightforward extension of parameter estimation.
“in this framework, prediction is a fairly straightforward extension of parameter estimation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ The meaning of 'time' in episodic memory and mental time travel · p. 25It is not clear that autonoetic consciousness of particular autobiographical episodes is necessary to flexibly plan specific future events.
“it is not clear that the remaining criterion - autonoetic consciousness of particular autobiographical episodes - is necessary to flexibly plan specific future events”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26To the extent that one can only foresee those future events that one has experienced in the past, and events never repeat themselves exactly, one can never apply the memory of any past event to a future situation.
“To the extent that one can only foresee those future events that one has experienced in the past, and to the extent that events never repeat themselves exactly, one can never apply the memory of any past event to a future situation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Events never repeat themselves exactly.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26Mental time travel is a principled, but narrow and computationally limiting, implementation of foresight.
“Mental time travel is a principled, but a narrow and computationally limiting, implementation of foresight”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ The meaning of 'time' in episodic memory and mental time travel · p. 25Research on humans' memory for times and on thinking about the times of future events shows that there are some common processes and some differences.
“Research on humans' memory for times and on thinking about the times of future events shows that there are some common processes (e.g., the use of representations of time patterns) and some differences (using impressions of the ages of memories)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Past and future, human and nonhuman, semantic / procedural and episodic · p. 27Procedural and semantic memories are laid down by experience, which is necessarily temporally prior to their formation, but they are not memories about particular events in the past, still less about events in the future.
“Both procedural and semantic memories are laid down by experience, which is necessarily temporally prior to their formation, but they are not memories about particular events in the past, still less about events in the future.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26The Bayesian framework subsumes and greatly extends the authors' framework for foresight.
“In this sense, the Bayesian framework subsumes, and greatly extends, the authors' framework for foresight.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Past and future, human and nonhuman, semantic / procedural and episodic · p. 27Procedural and semantic memory are timeless forms of memory, evolutionarily preceding the emergence of episodic memory, in both its retrospective and prospective forms.
“We would bracket procedural and semantic memory together as timeless forms of memory, evolutionarily preceding the emergence of episodic memory, in both its retrospective and prospective forms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ The meaning of 'time' in episodic memory and mental time travel · p. 25From about 4 years of age onward, many children are able to recall unique happenings when asked about events such as 'your last birthday' or 'last Christmas,' but this ability appears years before children are aware of when these events had occurred relative to one another.
“From about 4 years of age onward, many children are able to recall unique happenings when asked about events such as 'your last birthday' or 'last Christmas,' but this ability appears years before children are aware of when these events had occurred relative to one another”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Friedman 1992
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ The meaning of 'time' in episodic memory and mental time travel · p. 25Developmental changes can co-occur but be rooted in different processes, and the deficits that hippocampal patients show in episodic memory and anticipation could be due in part to problems other than the capacity to engage in mental time travel.
“developmental changes can co-occur but be rooted in different processes, and the deficits that hippocampal patients show in EM and anticipation could be due in part to problems other than the capacity to engage in MTT”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hassabis et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ Past and future, human and nonhuman, semantic / procedural and episodic · p. 27Semantic memory encodes tenseless facts.
“Semantic memory encodes tenseless facts like 'sugar be sweet.'”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26Different forms of memory might interact with each other and with other mental faculties to help foresee the future.
“different forms of memory might interact with each other and with other mental faculties to help foresee the future”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26The authors' formulation of foresight places patently untenable limitations on one's very ability to imagine.
“the authors' formulation of foresight ultimately amounts to placing patently untenable limitations on one's very ability to imagine”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26The Bayesian framework is biologically plausible.
“First, this framework is clearly biologically plausible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26One can mentally create events that are sufficiently different from any that one has experienced before.
“one can obviously mentally create events that are sufficiently different from any that one has experienced before”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ The meaning of 'time' in episodic memory and mental time travel · p. 25Throughout development, planning may rely to a greater extent on information abstracted from repeated episodes and from semantic memory.
“Throughout development, planning may rely to a greater extent on information abstracted from repeated episodes (the commonalities of which are more relevant to the future than the particularities) and from semantic memory”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ The meaning of 'time' in episodic memory and mental time travel · p. 25The relevant quality of episodic memory might best be thought of as experiences that are remembered as occurring on a particular occasion.
“It might be best to think of the relevant quality of EM as experiences that are remembered as occurring on a particular occasion”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Past and future, human and nonhuman, semantic / procedural and episodic · p. 26The overlap of representations of past and future is not a completely new idea.
“The overlap of representations of past and future is not a completely new idea.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Meacham & Singer 1977
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Past and future, human and nonhuman, semantic / procedural and episodic · p. 27Tulving identifies episodic memory closely with both past and future (planned) events.
“Tulving (2005) identifies episodic memory closely with both past and future (i.e., planned) events.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tulving 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisecitation§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26The ability to foresee future situations is likely to depend on many different mental faculties, including memory of the past.
“the ability to foresee future 'situations' is likely to depend on many different mental faculties, including memory of the past”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26The Bayesian framework can utilize episodic memory but is not dependent on it.
“Thus, the Bayesian framework can utilize episodic memory, but is not dependent on it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26One can easily generalize and extrapolate, with arbitrary specificity and detail, from past experience.
“one can easily generalize and extrapolate, with arbitrary specificity and detail, from past experience”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ The meaning of 'time' in episodic memory and mental time travel · p. 25There is no evidence that events are automatically coded by the times of their occurrence or that memory is temporally organized.
“There is no evidence that events are automatically coded by the times of their occurrence or that memory is temporally organized”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Friedman 1993
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Friedman 2004
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26One can vividly imagine events that one is certain never to have experienced in the past, such as a boulder rolling up a hill on its own.
“one can also vividly imagine events that one is certain never to have experienced in the past, such as a boulder rolling up a hill on its own”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26Some degree of generalization and extrapolation is a prerequisite for predicting future events.
“Some degree of generalization and extrapolation is a prerequisite for predicting future events”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ Mental time travel sickness and a Bayesian remedy · p. 26Information about the particularities of specific past events, such as that provided by episodic memory, is not needed for specific predictions about future events.
“Information about the particularities of specific past events, such as that provided by episodic memory, is not needed”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ Memory, imagination, and the asymmetry between past and future · p. 28Foresight can be served by either direct semantic prospection or more roundabout mental time travel directed to the future.
“foresight can be served by either direct semantic prospection or more round about mental time travel directed to the future.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Past and future, human and nonhuman, semantic / procedural and episodic · p. 27Gibson's (1979) idea of affordances depends crucially on perception-action coupling.
“Gibson's (1979) idea of affordances depends crucially on perception-action coupling.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gibson 1979
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ Developing past and future selves for time travel narratives · p. 29Mental time travel requires the sense of a past and future self, which is lacking in the early years of life.
“Mental time travel requires the sense of a past and future self, which is lacking in the early years of life.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Past and future, human and nonhuman, semantic / procedural and episodic · p. 27Hommel et al. (2001) concluded that perceived events and to-be-produced events are equally represented by integrated, task-tuned networks of feature codes.
“Hommel et al. (2001) give an overview pointing to the conclusion that 'Perceived events (perceptions) and to-be-produced events (actions) are equally represented by integrated, task-tuned networks of feature codes - cognitive structures we call event codes'”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hommel et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Developing past and future selves for time travel narratives · p. 30Self-memory is late in developing, and is followed by developing ideas of a self-future.
“Self-memory is late in developing, and is followed by developing ideas of a self-future.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Prospection or projection: Neurobiological basis of stimulus-independent mental traveling · p. 31The deficit in amnesic patients was not restricted to personally relevant possible future events but was common to a wide variety of commonplace scenarios, with severe impairment in placing fragmented images into one coherent spatial context.
“the deficit was not restricted to personally relevant possible future events (e.g., a possible Christmas event) but was common to wide variety of commonplace scenarios (situation of standing in the main hall of a museum, etc.), with severe impairment in placing fragmented images into one coherent spatial context.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hassabis et al. (2007)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ Has mental time travel really affected human culture? · p. 29Even if it was established that mental time travel has significantly affected cultural change, this does not automatically invalidate Darwinian approaches to culture.
“Second, even if it was established that mental time travel has significantly affected cultural change, this does not automatically invalidate Darwinian approaches to culture.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ Memory, imagination, and the asymmetry between past and future · p. 28The past has actually happened, which means that it once was the present, and thus subject to memory storage by suitably equipped organisms.
“The past has actually happened, which means that it once was the present, and thus subject to memory storage by suitably equipped organisms”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ Memory, imagination, and the asymmetry between past and future · p. 28In the macroscopic world the effect follows the cause in time, but never the reverse.
“In the macroscopic world the effect follows the cause in time, but never the reverse.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Memory, imagination, and the asymmetry between past and future · p. 28There is no such destination for prospective mental time travel, because the future has not happened and all we can know is that all possible futures, except one, will in fact not materialize, but not which one.
“There is no such destination for prospective mental time travel, because unlike the past, the future has not happened and all we can know is that all possible futures, except one , will in fact not materialize, but not which one.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Memory, imagination, and the asymmetry between past and future · p. 28The present (cause) becomes a memory (effect) by the next present along future-directed causal pathways.
“That is how the present (cause) becomes a memory (effect) by the next present along future-directed causal pathways.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Past and future, human and nonhuman, semantic / procedural and episodic · p. 27Enactive Perception emphasizes the involvement of action in perception.
“In philosophy, a school of thought known as 'Enactive Perception' also emphasizes the involvement of action in perception”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Noë 2004
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ Memory, imagination, and the asymmetry between past and future · p. 28In principle, the possibility of veridical memory exists.
“That means that in principle, at least, the possibility of veridical memory exists.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ Memory, imagination, and the asymmetry between past and future · p. 28Occasionally, we are able to recover such detail by going back and 'reliving' the situation, though that utility is in all likelihood a rather marginal one.
“Occasionally, we are in fact able to recover such detail by going back and 'reliving,' as it were, the situation in question, though that utility is in all likelihood a rather marginal one.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Memory, imagination, and the asymmetry between past and future · p. 28Rehearsal for questions that may be posed in a forthcoming job interview is readily accomplished through semantic prospection.
“rehearsal for questions that may be posed in a forthcoming job interview (sect. 2.1) is readily accomplished through semantic prospection”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ Prospection or projection: Neurobiological basis of stimulus-independent mental traveling · p. 30The series of processes involved with reward-based decision making is best described as 'procedural future cognition' that might be less flexible and stimulus-bound.
“This series of processes involved with reward-based decision making is obviously one form of prospection, but, as was defined in the target article, it is best described as 'procedural future cognition' that might be less flexible and stimulus-bound.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Past and future, human and nonhuman, semantic / procedural and episodic · p. 27The ability to conjure up scripts is a kind of general mental space integration capacity.
“The ability to conjure up such scripts is a kind of general mental space integration capacity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ Memory, imagination, and the asymmetry between past and future · p. 28The veridical memory is the 'destination' towards which we steer in retrospective mental time travel.
“The veridical memory is the 'destination' towards which we steer in retrospective mental time travel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ Past and future, human and nonhuman, semantic / procedural and episodic · p. 27Scripts form a framework for our retrospective and prospective representations of events.
“Such scripts form a framework for our retrospective and prospective representations of events.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schank & Abelson 1977
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Prospection or projection: Neurobiological basis of stimulus-independent mental traveling · p. 31Addis et al. (2007) controlled more strictly for phenomenological quality of remembered/imagined events so that they were truly episodic and details were constant across future and past conditions.
“Addis et al. (2007) controlled more strictly for phenomenological quality of remembered / imagined events so that they were truly 'episodic' and that details, emotionality, personal significance, and field / observer perspective were constant across the future and past conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Addis et al. (2007)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Prospection or projection: Neurobiological basis of stimulus-independent mental traveling · p. 30Mental time travel may be extended more generally to 'mental traveling,' accomplished by stimulus-independent mental processes typical of human thought.
“Mental time travel may be extended more generally to 'mental traveling,' accomplished by stimulus-independent mental processes typical of human thought.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Prospection or projection: Neurobiological basis of stimulus-independent mental traveling · p. 31Hassabis et al. (2007) demonstrated that amnesic patients with bilateral medial temporal damage cannot imagine new experiences in addition to impairment in remembering past episodes.
“Hassabis et al. (2007) have demonstrated striking evidence that amnesic patients with bilateral medial temporal damage cannot imagine new experiences in addition to their impairment in remembering past episodes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hassabis et al. (2007)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ Past and future, human and nonhuman, semantic / procedural and episodic · p. 27The discovery of mirror neurons shows overlaps between sensory and motor representations of actions.
“The discovery of mirror neurons also shows overlaps between sensory and motor representations of actions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ Memory, imagination, and the asymmetry between past and future · p. 28Time itself, along with the causality of the macroscopic world, is profoundly and fundamentally asymmetric with respect to past and future.
“time itself, along with the causality of the macroscopic world, is profoundly and fundamentally asymmetric with respect to past and future.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Memory, imagination, and the asymmetry between past and future · p. 28Information whose efficacy for success in planning for the future exceeds that provided by semantic prospection may be unavailable in principle.
“Such information may in fact be unavailable in principle, for reasons connected with the nature of time and its relation to memory and imagination.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Past and future, human and nonhuman, semantic / procedural and episodic · p. 27Martin et al. (1996) found that naming tools selectively activated a left premotor area also activated by imagined hand movements.
“Martin et al. (1996), who found that 'naming tools selectively activated a left premotor area also activated by imagined hand movements.'”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Martin et al. 1996
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Memory, imagination, and the asymmetry between past and future · p. 28Which of the possible futures is the 'true future' cannot be known until it has 'travelled to us,' and become the present.
“Which of these is the ' true future' cannot be known until it has 'travelled to us,' and become the present.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Developing past and future selves for time travel narratives · p. 30Episodic memory is the only form of memory that is about the past; it is also the only form that is about the self (autonoetic).
“EM is the only form of memory that is about the past; it is also the only form that is about the self (autonoetic) (Tulving 1993).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tulving 1993
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Has mental time travel really affected human culture? · p. 29Critics of cultural evolution commonly conflate imperfect human foresight with the perfect supernatural foresight of an omniscient being.
“Critics of cultural evolution commonly conflate this imperfect 'human foresight' with the perfect 'supernatural foresight' of an omniscient being.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Memory, imagination, and the asymmetry between past and future · p. 28There is no corresponding possibility with regard to the future, because the future has by definition not happened, being a mixture of coexisting latent possibilities as yet unresolved.
“There is no corresponding possibility with regard to the future, because the future has by definition not happened, being a mixture of coexisting latent possibilities as yet unresolved.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Has mental time travel really affected human culture? · p. 29Biologically evolved biases in learning can 'predict' the future based on past regularities, but biological evolution cannot actively simulate novel future events.
“Biologically evolved biases in learning can 'predict' the future based on past regularities (Lorenz 1969; Mayr 1982), but biological evolution cannot actively simulate novel future events.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lorenz 1969
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Mayr 1982
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Past and future, human and nonhuman, semantic / procedural and episodic · p. 27Mecklinger et al. (2002) concluded that visual working memory for manipulable objects is based on motor programmes associated with their use.
“Mecklinger et al. (2002) concluded that 'visual working memory for manipulable objects is based on motor programmes associated with their use'”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mecklinger et al. 2002
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Memory, imagination, and the asymmetry between past and future · p. 28Those examples illustrate only the utility of foresight, not the specific utility of mental time travel for that purpose.
“those examples illustrate only the utility of foresight - which no one doubts - but not the specific utility of mental time travel for that purpose”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Developing past and future selves for time travel narratives · p. 29Future talk is less frequent than talk about the past and occurs more with older preschoolers.
“there is evidence that future talk is less frequent than talk about the past and occurs more with older preschoolers (Eisenberg 2006)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eisenberg 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Has mental time travel really affected human culture? · p. 28The existence of mental time travel, specifically regarding future events (foresight), has direct relevance to an ongoing debate concerning the validity of the theory of Darwinian cultural evolution.
“The existence of mental time travel, specifically regarding future events (i.e., foresight), has direct relevance to an ongoing debate concerning the validity of the theory of Darwinian cultural evolution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Memory, imagination, and the asymmetry between past and future · p. 28Every single example illustrating foresight by means of mental time travel provided in the target article can be implemented by direct semantic prospection instead.
“every single example illustrating foresight by means of mental time travel provided in the target article can be implemented by direct semantic prospection instead.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Has mental time travel really affected human culture? · p. 29Existing studies suggest that foresight plays little role in directing technological change.
“Existing studies (e.g., Basalla 1988) suggest that foresight plays little role in directing technological change”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Basalla 1988
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Prospection or projection: Neurobiological basis of stimulus-independent mental traveling · p. 31There is probably a corresponding neurobiological distinction between declarative and non-declarative future prospection: stimulus-oriented non-declarative prospection may depend on cortico-basal ganglia loop, while stimulus-independent declarative prospection may recruit medial prefrontal-parietal-temporal network.
“Probably there is a corresponding neurobiological distinction between the two in the brain: The stimulus-oriented, non-declarative prospection may depend largely on cortico-basal ganglia loop, whereas the stimulus-independent, declarative prospection may recruit the medial prefrontal-parietal-temporal network.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Empirical evaluation of mental time travel · p. 33Additional behavioural criteria for 'episodic-like' memory are that memory must have www content, integrated structure, and flexible deployment.
“We subsequently proposed additional behavioural criteria for 'episodic-like' memory; namely, that the memory must not only be shown to have www content but also to have an integrated structure and that the information can be deployed flexibly (Clayton et al. 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Clayton et al. 2003
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ What are the evolutionary causes of mental time travel? · p. 32MTT might to some extent already have been in place from earlier social selection pressures, but changes in hominin ecology chiseled out the more advanced ability humans depend on now.
“MTT might to some extent already have been in place as a result of earlier selection pressures in the social life, but changes in hominin ecology chiseled out the more advanced ability that we seem totally dependent upon nowadays.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ On the constructive episodic simulation of past and future events · p. 34The hippocampus shows increased activity when people construct and elaborate on both future and past events; right hippocampus shows greater activity during construction of future than past events.
“the hippocampus shows increased activity when people construct and elaborate on both future and past events; indeed, the right hippocampus shows greater activity during construction of future than past events (Addis et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Addis et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ What are the evolutionary causes of mental time travel? · p. 32These morphological adaptations must have been related to behavioral adaptations, which could be a result of evolving MTT.
“These morphological adaptations must have been related to behavioral adaptations, which could be a result of an evolving mental time travel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ What are the evolutionary causes of mental time travel? · p. 32Once Acheulean tools were reached (beginning ~1.5 mya), MTT was in an advanced stage.
“Once the period of Acheulean tools was reached, beginning about 1.5 million years ago, mental time travel was in an advanced stage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ On the constructive episodic simulation of past and future events · p. 33The constructive episodic simulation hypothesis holds that episodic simulation of future events requires a memory system that allows flexible recombination of details from past events into novel scenarios.
“the constructive episodic simulation hypothesis, which holds that episodic simulation of future events requires a memory system that allows the flexible recombination of details from past events into novel scenarios.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Schacter & Addis 2007a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schacter & Addis 2007b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ What are the evolutionary causes of mental time travel? · p. 32De Waal (1982) noted that advanced social cognition in great apes probably was a stepping-stone to complex artifactual cognition in humans.
“De Waal (1982) noted that the advanced social cognition apparent in great apes probably was a stepping-stone to the complex artifactual cognition in humans.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites De Waal (1982)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ Empirical evaluation of mental time travel · p. 33The semantic memory system allows individuals to acquire information about themselves and their world through different sensory modalities and flexibly retrieve and use this information, including personal information and autobiographical facts.
“The semantic memory system allows individuals to acquire information about themselves and their world through different sensory modalities and flexibly retrieve and use this information. This includes personal information and autobiographical facts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ What are the evolutionary causes of mental time travel? · p. 32Humans are probably the species most dependent on MTT, because the world we survive in is manipulated and constructed by complex artifacts, so our mind must be highly tuned to these aspects.
“And, we are probably also the species most dependent on MTT - the world in which we can survive is a world manipulated and constructed by complex artifacts, so our mind must be highly tuned to these aspects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ On the constructive episodic simulation of past and future events · p. 33Remembering past events and imagining future events draw on similar kinds of information in episodic memory and involve many shared processes.
“According to this hypothesis, remembering past events and imagining or simulating future events draw on similar kinds of information in episodic memory and involve many shared processes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Schacter & Addis 2007a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schacter & Addis 2007b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ Empirical evaluation of mental time travel · p. 33In the absence of such criteria, the comparative aspect of MTT is not a matter of scientific enquiry but of intellectual preference.
“In the absence of such criteria, the comparative aspect of MTT is not a matter of scientific enquiry but of intellectual preference.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ On the constructive episodic simulation of past and future events · p. 33Episodic memory possesses characteristics that make it highly adaptive for simulating novel future scenarios based on past experiences, but also make it prone to errors and distortions from miscombining stored elements.
“Episodic memory possesses exactly these characteristics, which makes the system highly adaptive for simulating novel future scenarios based on past experiences, but also makes the system, when used for remembering, prone to errors and distortions that arise from miscombining stored elements - a common form of memory distortion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Prospection or projection: Neurobiological basis of stimulus-independent mental traveling · p. 31Buckner and Carroll (2006) proposed that prospection, episodic memory, theory of mind, and spatial navigation reflect the workings of the same core brain network (medial prefrontal-parietal-temporal network).
“Buckner and Carroll (2006) to propose that envisioning the future (prospection), remembering the past (episodic memory), conceiving the viewpoint of others (theory of mind), as well as shifting one's topographical perspective (some forms of spatial navigation) reflect the workings of the same core brain network, that is, the medial prefrontal-parietal-temporal network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Buckner and Carroll (2006)
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ What are the evolutionary causes of mental time travel? · p. 32If sociality is the crucial factor behind evolution of MTT, it should be expected in some other primates.
“So, if sociality is the crucial factor behind the evolution of mental time travel, it should be expected in some other primates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ What are the evolutionary causes of mental time travel? · p. 32Humans and apes seem almost equally developed in social cognition, though differing widely in technical understanding.
“He observes that humans and apes seem almost equally developed in social cognition, though differing widely in technical understanding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites De Waal (1982)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Empirical evaluation of mental time travel · p. 33Most behaviours in any animal are likely to be species typical and a result of some form of predisposition and learning.
“Most behaviours in any animal, cognitive or otherwise, are likely to be species typical and a result of some form of predisposition and learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ What are the evolutionary causes of mental time travel? · p. 32It would be very hard to isolate behaviors connected to MTT when observing social life of nonverbal creatures; such behaviors could be explained in a leaner way than assuming MTT.
“It would be very hard to isolate behaviors connected to MTT when observing the social life of nonverbal creatures; such behaviors could be explained in a leaner way than assuming MTT.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Empirical evaluation of mental time travel · p. 33It is not testable empirically whether this type of future planning depends upon episodic personal projection or semantic knowledge.
“What we do not know, and think is not testable empirically, is whether this type of future planning depends upon episodic personal projection or semantic knowledge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ Empirical evaluation of mental time travel · p. 33The what, where, and when must be bound together in order for an animal to discriminate one event from another.
“the important point here is that the what, where and when must be bound together in order that the animal can discriminate one event from another.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ What are the evolutionary causes of mental time travel? · p. 32The main components of Oldowan culture are manufacturing/use of stone tools, transport of artifacts, transport of carcasses, and use of accumulation spots.
“The main components of the Oldowan culture are recognized as: (1) the manufacturing and use of stone tools; (2) the transport of artifacts (at least stone tools); (3) the transport of pieces of carcasses; and (4) the use of accumulation spots (Plummer 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Plummer 2004
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ What are the evolutionary causes of mental time travel? · p. 32A significant advantage of Oldowan culture is that it enabled a much wider exploitation of meat resources.
“A significant advantage of this culture is that it enabled a much wider exploitation of meat resources.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Empirical evaluation of mental time travel · p. 33Humans may always combine episodic and semantic future thinking in assessing alternatives, but this does not prove that the episodic element is essential for future thinking.
“Humans may always combine episodic and semantic future thinking in assessing alternatives, but this does not prove that the episodic element is essential for future thinking.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Prospection or projection: Neurobiological basis of stimulus-independent mental traveling · p. 31Other brain imaging studies indicate roles of anterior prefrontal cortex in prospective memory or remembering action plans, and involvement of medial prefrontal and parietal cortices in stimulus-independent thought.
“other brain imaging studies indicating roles of the anterior part of the prefrontal cortex in prospective memory or remembering mentally represented action plans during ongoing cognitive activities (e.g., Okuda et al. 2007), as well as involvement of medial prefrontal and parietal cortices in stimulus-independent thought or mind-wondering (Mason et al. 2007a, but see also Gilbert et al. 2007 and”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Okuda et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Mason et al. 2007a
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ What are the evolutionary causes of mental time travel? · p. 32MTT might not be unique to humans, but humans have the highest physical-technical accuracy and focus in their travels.
“MTT might not be unique to us, but we have the highest physical-technical accuracy and focus in our travels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Studying mental states is not a research program for comparative cognition · p. 34This path leads to a quest for an existence proof followed by endless disputes over whether 'it' really was demonstrated.
“This path leads to a quest for an existence proof (just one animal with 'it' is enough), followed by endless disputes over whether 'it' really was demonstrated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 35Chimpanzees have some appreciation of the duration of the delay, and a flexible capacity of weighing different options based on time to and size of what is to come relative to what is currently available.
“This suggests some appreciation of the duration of the delay, and a flexible capacity of weighing different options based on time to and size of what is to come relative to what is currently available.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 35Scrub jays can store their breakfast in the evening at a location where they occasionally are forced to spend the night, but are never provided with breakfast, suggesting future-oriented behaviour not driven by current need.
“scrub jays can store their breakfast in the evening at a location where they occasionally are forced to spend the night, but are never provided with breakfast, suggesting future-oriented behaviour not driven by current need (Raby et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Raby et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Studying mental states is not a research program for comparative cognition · p. 35The tests for animals are closely analogous to those used with people, and data from people and monkeys have sometimes been reported in the same article.
“The tests for animals are also closely analogous to those used with people, and indeed data from people and monkeys have sometimes been reported in the same article (see Smith et al. 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smith et al. 2003
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 35Future-oriented behaviour and episodic-like memory in other animals suggest that not all animals are limited to the present.
“future-oriented behaviour and episodic-like memory in other animals suggest that not all animals are limited to the present.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Studying mental states is not a research program for comparative cognition · p. 35The comparative study of numerical cognition has made real progress since researchers moved beyond asking 'Do animals count?' to comparative analysis of components.
“the comparative study of numerical cognition has made real progress since researchers moved beyond asking, 'Do animals count?' (see Shettleworth 1998) to the comparative analysis of components of numerical competence”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Shettleworth 1998
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Feigenson et al. 2004
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ On the constructive episodic simulation of past and future events · p. 34Componential approaches have been usefully applied to memory and should be similarly helpful when applied to future event simulation.
“Such componential approaches have been usefully applied to memory by numerous investigators, and should be similarly helpful when applied to future event simulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Studying mental states is not a research program for comparative cognition · p. 35Exact perception of small numerosities and Weber's law-based discrimination among larger ones may be widely shared among vertebrates, whereas exact appreciation of quantities larger than about 5 is normally confined to numerate humans.
“These may be widely shared among vertebrates, whereas exact appreciation of quantities larger than about 5 is normally confined to numerate humans (Pica et al. 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pica et al. 2004
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Studying mental states is not a research program for comparative cognition · p. 34Researchers can productively seek no more than functional similarities between human and animal behaviors in analogous situations.
“Researchers can productively seek no more than functional similarities between human and animal behaviors in analogous situations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Studying mental states is not a research program for comparative cognition · p. 34Monkeys' reports of metacognitive certainty transfer across tasks, and they behave as if using it to control information seeking in naturalistic and operant tasks.
“Monkeys' reports of metacognitive certainty transfer across tasks (Kornell et al. 2007), and they behave as if they are using it to control information seeking in naturalistic (Hampton et al. 2004) and operant tasks (Kornell et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kornell et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hampton et al. 2004
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Studying mental states is not a research program for comparative cognition · p. 34Because we can only observe behavior, we can never know if animals are mentally time traveling anywhere.
“Because we can only observe behavior, we can never know if animals are mentally time traveling anywhere.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Studying mental states is not a research program for comparative cognition · p. 34We can never know what other species' mental experiences are like.
“Not only can we never know what other species' mental experiences are like”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Studying mental states is not a research program for comparative cognition · p. 34Monkeys show this functional relationship immediately when memory is taxed, indicating their behavior does not reflect learning to use cues like length of retention interval.
“Monkeys show this functional relationship immediately when memory is taxed, further indicating that their behavior does not reflect learning to use cues like length of the retention interval.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Studying mental states is not a research program for comparative cognition · p. 35Even so, it still cannot reveal the monkeys' subjective states.
“Even so, it still cannot reveal the monkeys' subjective states.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 35Our results on chimpanzees counter the interpretation that the apes only needed to learn to always return with the same tool and that the set-up allowed for tool collection based on a current need.
“Our results on chimpanzees, however, counter this interpretation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 35New results on chimpanzees suggest that they plan for the future and possess some MTT components.
“new results on chimpanzees suggest that they plan for the future and possess some MTT components.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Dufour & Sterck, submitted
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dufour et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Mulcahy & Call 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Studying mental states is not a research program for comparative cognition · p. 34The title of the target article implies that we can learn directly about animals' mental states, and its focus on human uniqueness impels a search for an existence proof rather than understanding shared components.
“It implies that we can learn directly about animals' mental states, and its focus on human uniqueness impels a search for an existence proof rather than for understanding what components of given cognitive processes are shared among species and why.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 35The conditions for MTT in animals are laid out, so the capacity of MTT itself can be investigated.
“the conditions for MTT in animals are laid out, so the capacity of MTT itself can be investigated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Studying mental states is not a research program for comparative cognition · p. 35There is reasonable theoretical agreement on relevant procedures and predicted patterns of data in monkey metacognition research.
“One reason this body of work is so compelling is that there is reasonable theoretical agreement on relevant procedures and predicted patterns of data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ On the constructive episodic simulation of past and future events · p. 34In the updated model, central executive is associated with strategic control, whereas episodic buffer is a limited capacity system that provides temporary storage of information in a multimodal code, capable of binding information into a unitary episodic representation.
“In the updated model, the central executive is associated with strategic control of processing, whereas the episodic buffer is 'a limited capacity system that provides temporary storage of information held in a multimodal code, which is capable of binding information from the subsidiary systems, and from long-term memory, into a unitary episodic representation' (Baddeley 2000, p. 417).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baddeley 2000
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ On the constructive episodic simulation of past and future events · p. 34Several brain regions show greater activity during future versus past event construction; one is right hippocampus, another is medial part of right anterior prefrontal cortex (BA 10).
“several brain regions show greater activity during future versus past event construction (Addis et al. 2007). As noted earlier, one of those regions is the right hippocampus. Another such region is a medial part of right anterior prefrontal cortex (BA 10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Addis et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ On the constructive episodic simulation of past and future events · p. 34Baddeley (2000) updated working memory model to include a fourth component, the episodic buffer.
“Baddeley (2000) updated the model to include a fourth component, the episodic buffer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baddeley 2000
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 35The 'broadcaster' is probably not required for mental time travel, although it may enhance joint action.
“From the capacities mentioned, the 'broadcaster' is probably not required for MTT, although it may enhance joint action.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ Studying mental states is not a research program for comparative cognition · p. 34Searching for a yes or no answer about human uniqueness is not a productive way to proceed with research in comparative cognition.
“searching for a yes or no answer to a question about human uniqueness is not a productive way to proceed with research in comparative cognition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Studying mental states is not a research program for comparative cognition · p. 35Interpreting what animals do as revealing mental time travel is one example of a widespread return of anthropomorphism, which appeals to the public without necessarily advancing understanding.
“Interpreting what they do as revealing mental time travel is one example of a rather widespread return of anthropomorphism, which appeals to the public without necessarily advancing understanding (Wynne 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wynne 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ R4. Mental time travel and developmental psychology · p. 42Autobiographical memory is generally taken to include not just episodic memory, but also semantic knowledge that one may have about one's history.
“Autobiographical memory is generally taken to include not just episodic memory, but also semantic knowledge that one may have about one's history.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ R2.5. Combinations and recombinations · p. 41Humans can imagine whatever, wherever, and whenever.
“We recognize that humans can imagine whatever, wherever , and whenever (Suddendorf & Busby 2003b),”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suddendorf & Busby 2003b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ R3. Mental time travel and neuroscience · p. 42Time travel almost always takes us to different places.
“it is also worth noting that time travel almost always takes us to different places.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ R3. Mental time travel and neuroscience · p. 42Laterality may hold the key, with evidence that the right hippocampus shows greater activity during construction of future events compared to past ones.
“Another possibility, suggested by Schacter & Addis , is that laterality may hold the key, with evidence that the right hippocampus shows greater activity during construction of future events compared to past ones (Addis et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Addis et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ R2.4. Beyond past and future · p. 41Both mental time travel and theory of mind may draw on basic component abilities such as metarepresentation and executive functions, or 'frame-of-reference awareness'.
“On the one hand, both may draw on basic component abilities such as metarepresentation and executive functions (e.g., Suddendorf 1999), or 'frame-of-reference awareness';”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suddendorf 1999
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ R3. Mental time travel and neuroscience · p. 42If the Uniqueness hypothesis is correct, then some aspects of these disorders may be uniquely human, too.
“If the Uniqueness hypothesis is correct, then some aspects of these disorders may be uniquely human, too.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ R3. Mental time travel and neuroscience · p. 42Putative disturbances of the capacity to travel mentally in time can only be informed by such models to the extent that there are animal parallels.
“Putative disturbances of the capacity to travel mentally in time can only be informed by such models to the extent that there are animal parallels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ R2.4. Beyond past and future · p. 41Understanding others' minds often depends on understanding what happened to them, and what their plans and goals might be.
“and understanding others' minds often depends on understanding what happened to them, and what their plans and goals might be.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ R3. Mental time travel and neuroscience · p. 42Clues may come from various other syndromes (e.g., autism) and disorders (e.g., delusions).
“Clues may come from various other syndromes (e.g., autism; Suddendorf & Corballis 1997; Williams et al. 2001) and disorders (e.g., delusions; Gerrans 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Suddendorf & Corballis 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Williams et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gerrans 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ R2.4. Beyond past and future · p. 41The relation between mental time travel and theory of mind may be quite complex.
“The relation between mental time travel and theory of mind may be quite complex.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ R2.5. Combinations and recombinations · p. 41Even memories that reveal themselves as images require a story grammar if remembrance is to be distinguished from random hallucinations.
“have acknowledged previously (Suddendorf & Corballis 1997) Freud's observation that even memories that reveal themselves as images require a story grammar if remembrance is to be distinguished from random hallucinations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suddendorf & Corballis 1997
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ R3. Mental time travel and neuroscience · p. 41The evidence overwhelmingly confirms the strong overlap between brain areas involved in imagining the future and in recollecting the past, and hence the Janus hypothesis.
“This evidence overwhelmingly confirms the strong overlap between brain areas involved in imagining the future and in recollecting the past, and hence the Janus hypothesis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ R2.5. Combinations and recombinations · p. 41Given a basic vocabulary of actors, objects, and events, we can construct unique episodes in the past and create scenarios to deal with unique contingencies in the future.
“That is, given a basic vocabulary of actors, objects, and events, we can construct unique episodes in the past and create scenarios to deal with unique contingencies in the future.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suddendorf & Corballis 1997
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Premisecitation§ R2.5. Combinations and recombinations · p. 41The veracity of episodic memory cannot be used to define it.
“Several commentators (e.g., Ainslie; Schacter & Addis ) agree with us that the veracity of episodic memory cannot be used to define it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ainslie
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schacter & Addis
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ R3. Mental time travel and neuroscience · p. 42The brain areas involved in mental time travel may also be involved in mental traveling in space, and into the minds of others, as well as in time.
“He and Buckner also suggest that the brain areas involved in mental time travel may also be involved in mental traveling in space, and into the minds of others, as well as in time”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ R3. Mental time travel and neuroscience · p. 42Double dissociations are particularly informative.
“Double dissociations are particularly informative, and we agree that further interdisciplinary exchange is highly desirable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lorenz
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ R3. Mental time travel and neuroscience · p. 42The discussion of animal capacities is important to developing potential 'animal models' for certain conditions.
“For example, the discussion of animal capacities is important to developing potential 'animal models' for certain conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ R2.4. Beyond past and future · p. 41Mental time travels are mental states.
“Conversely, mental time travels are mental states,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ R3. Mental time travel and neuroscience · p. 42Our considerations may inform different lines of research in psychopathology.
“Our considerations, in turn, may inform different lines of research in psychopathology”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 36Our results on future-oriented behaviour in chimpanzees indicate that they possibly show future planning and have some of the mental capacities required for mental time travel.
“In conclusion, our results on future-oriented behaviour in chimpanzees indicate that they possibly show future planning and have some of the mental capacities required for MTT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ R2.5. Combinations and recombinations · p. 41Errors of memory hold clues to understanding the memory system.
“Just as visual illusions hold vital clues to studying normal vision, so errors of memory also hold clues to understanding the system”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 36Theory of mind has also been proposed to require a number of components, among them the capacity to appreciate the future.
“ToM has also been proposed to require a number of components, among them the capacity to appreciate the future (Barrett et al. 2003, p. 496).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Barrett et al. 2003
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ R3. Mental time travel and neuroscience · p. 42The same evidence also implicates a medial part of the right anterior prefrontal cortex (BA10), which may be the seat of an 'episodic buffer' that binds multimodal information.
“But again, this same evidence also implicates a medial part of the right anterior prefrontal cortex (BA10), which they suggest may be the seat of an 'episodic buffer' (Baddeley 2000) that binds multimodal information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baddeley 2000
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ R3. Mental time travel and neuroscience · p. 42The once-common belief that cerebral asymmetry is uniquely human has now been thoroughly refuted.
“although the once-common belief that cerebral asymmetry is uniquely human has now been thoroughly refuted (Vallortigara & Rogers 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vallortigara & Rogers 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ R4. Mental time travel and developmental psychology · p. 42Few studies have attempted to directly investigate the development of mental time travel into the past and future, but there is a relatively large literature on the development of related concepts such as autobiographical memory.
“Few studies have attempted to directly investigate the development of mental time travel into the past and future (e.g. Busby & Suddendorf 2005), but there is a relatively large literature on the development of related concepts such as autobiographical memory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Busby & Suddendorf 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ R3. Mental time travel and neuroscience · p. 42Failure in any one of the components may lead to no mental time travel, or to disturbances that may be more informative about the physiology than studying the intact system.
“Failure in any one of the components may lead to no mental time travel, or to disturbances that may indeed be, as Lorenz suggested, more informative about the physiology than studying the intact system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ R2.5. Combinations and recombinations · p. 41This generativity may be an asset for flexible foresight, but it may serve less well for accurately recording events of the past.
“This generativity may be an asset for flexible foresight, but it may serve less well for accurately recording events of the past,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals · p. 36One is not part of the other, since they are two different capacities, but both mental time travel and theory of mind depend partly on the same components.
“This suggests that one is not part of the other, since they are two different capacities, but that both MTT and ToM depend partly on the same components.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Mental time travel requires self-awareness.
- Rests on an assumption: Theory of mind is an advanced cognitive capacity often attributed to humans only.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ R3. Mental time travel and neuroscience · p. 41It is possible that the hippocampus plays a more complex role in humans than in other species.
“It is possible that the hippocampus plays a more complex role in humans than in other species.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ R3. Mental time travel and neuroscience · p. 42His own work, and that of others, implicates brain networks involving medial aspects of prefrontal, temporal, and parietal cortices.
“His own work, and that of others, implicates brain networks involving medial aspects of prefrontal, temporal, and parietal cortices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ R3. Mental time travel and neuroscience · p. 42According to the HERA model, the left prefrontal cortex is more involved than the right PFC in episodic memory encoding, whereas the right PFC is more involved than the left PFC in episodic memory retrieval.
“According to the HERA (hemispheric encoding retrieval asymmetry) model (Habib et al. 2003), the left prefrontal cortex (PFC) is more involved than the right PFC in episodic memory encoding, whereas the right PFC is more involved than the left PFC in episodic memory retrieval”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Habib et al. 2003
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ R2.4. Beyond past and future · p. 41To understand what oneself and others might do in the future typically requires some appreciation of different mental states.
“For example, to understand what oneself and others might do in the future typically requires some appreciation of different mental states.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ R3. Mental time travel and neuroscience · p. 41Hippocampal 'place' cells in rodents might code 'when' as well as 'where,' perhaps providing a substrate for episodic-like memory, or the 'stage' component of the Theater hypothesis.
“de Hoz and Wood (2006) have reviewed evidence that hippocampal 'place' cells in rodents might code 'when' as well as 'where,' perhaps providing a substrate for episodic-like memory, or the 'stage' component of the Theater hypothesis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites de Hoz and Wood 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ R3. Mental time travel and neuroscience · p. 41Aggleton and Brown (1999) have proposed a model in which the hippocampus and other diencephalic structures are activated differently by semantic and episodic memory, at least in humans, although in both cases the prefrontal cortex is implicated as well.
“Aggleton and Brown (1999) have proposed a model in which the hippocampus and other diencephalic structures are activated differently by semantic and episodic memory, at least in humans, although in both cases the prefrontal cortex is implicated as well”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Aggleton and Brown 1999
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ R5.1. Are behavioral tests possible? · p. 44These are behavioral criteria that lend themselves to comparative inquiry.
“Yet, these are behavioral criteria that lend themselves to comparative inquiry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ R4. Mental time travel and developmental psychology · p. 42Developmental studies of mental time travel are important and may offer vital clues to other relevant disciplines.
“we do believe that developmental studies of mental time travel are important and that they may offer vital clues to the other relevant disciplines, too”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ ( Atance & Meltzoff ; Shettleworth ). · p. 43Most developmental theorists subscribe to something like the Components hypothesis and argue that a range of emerging capacities such as language, self-concept, and theory of mind are related to the development of autobiographic memory.
“most developmental theorists subscribe to something like the Components hypothesis and argue that a range of emerging capacities such as language, self-concept, and theory of mind are related to the development of autobiographic memory (e.g., Howe & Courage 1997; Levine 2004; Nelson & Fivush 2004; Perner 2000; Reese 2002; Suddendorf & Corballis 1997; Welch-Ross 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Howe & Courage 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Levine 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Nelson & Fivush 2004
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ ( Atance & Meltzoff ; Shettleworth ). · p. 43Little is yet known about the development of children's thinking about the future.
“Little is yet known about the development of children's thinking about the future (for reviews, see Haith et al. 1994; Moore & Lemon 2001), offering fertile ground for future research”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Haith et al. 1994
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Moore & Lemon 2001
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ ( Atance & Meltzoff ; Shettleworth ). · p. 43Some data, such as differential effects of the timing of adult-child conversations on memory, cannot be explained by genetic transmission and suggest that the conversations themselves do influence children's memory.
“However, some data, such as differential effects of the timing of adult-child conversations on memory (e.g., McGuigan & Salmon 2004), cannot be explained in that way and suggest that the conversations themselves do influence children's memory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McGuigan & Salmon 2004
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitation§ R5.2. New data on animal foresight · p. 44Because of counterbalancing, half the jays had received breakfast the morning of the test and the other half had not; thus, four of the birds had reason to expect no breakfast the next day, whereas the other four should have expected to receive breakfast; yet, the results for these two groups were combined, revealing only that, overall, the jays were caching more in the cage that was associated با
“Because of counterbalancing, half the jays had received breakfast the morning of the test and the other half had not. Thus, four of the birds had reason to expect no breakfast the next day, whereas the other four should have expected to receive breakfast. Yet, the results for these two groups were combined, revealing only that, overall, the jays were caching more in the cage that was associated”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Raby et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ ( Atance & Meltzoff ; Shettleworth ). · p. 43Very little is yet known about how children come to develop foresight, and developments may continue well into adolescence.
“Very little is yet known about how children come to develop foresight, and we suspect that developments continue well into adolescence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ R5.1. Are behavioral tests possible? · p. 43Future-directed action is the key towards mapping animals' competence and understanding the evolution of mental time travel.
“We suggest that future-directed action is the key towards mapping animals' competence and understanding the evolution of mental time travel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ ( Atance & Meltzoff ; Shettleworth ). · p. 43Key developments in foresight appear to also emerge over the preschool years, and when asked to tell something they did do yesterday and something they will do tomorrow, 3- to 5-year-old children perform similarly on both sets of questions.
“However, key developments in foresight appear to also emerge over the preschool years (e.g., Atance & O'Neill 2005; Suddendorf & Busby 2005), and when asked to tell something they did do yesterday and something they will do tomorrow, 3- to 5-year-old children perform similarly on both sets of questions (Busby & Suddendorf 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Atance & O'Neill 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Suddendorf & Busby 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Busby & Suddendorf 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ R5.1. Are behavioral tests possible? · p. 44Comparative research should focus on non-species-typical behavior because it provides evidence for flexibility and rules out any role of non-cognitive behavioral predispositions governing future-directed behavior.
“We thus argued that comparative research should focus on non-species-typical behavior because it (a) provides evidence for such flexibility and (b) rules out any role of non-cognitive behavioral predispositions governing future-directed behavior”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ R5.1. Are behavioral tests possible? · p. 43Natural selection needs something to get its teeth into, and an internal feel alone is inadequate for that.
“we pointed out that natural selection needs something to get its teeth into, and an internal feel alone is inadequate for that.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ ( Atance & Meltzoff ; Shettleworth ). · p. 43The author found associations between mental time travel tasks and standard measures of theory of mind, substantiating the Theory-of-mind hypothesis.
“However, the author found associations between these tasks and standard measures of theory of mind, substantiating the Theory-of-mind hypothesis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bischof-Kohler 2000
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ ( Atance & Meltzoff ; Shettleworth ). · p. 43Experimental designs have been proposed to assess future need anticipation, as future-directed action could demonstrate nonverbal capacities.
“Experimental designs have been proposed to assess future need anticipation, as future-directed action could demonstrate nonverbal capacities (Suddendorf 1994; Suddendorf & Busby 2005; Tulving 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Suddendorf 1994
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Suddendorf & Busby 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Tulving 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ R5.2. New data on animal foresight · p. 44These behaviors are largely instinctive, and the Bischof-Kohler hypothesis may still hold for 'individual, flexible situations involving noninstinctive behaviors'.
“These behaviors, though, are largely instinctive, and the hypothesis may still hold for 'individual, flexible situations involving noninstinctive behaviors' (sect. 3.3 of the target article).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ ( Atance & Meltzoff ; Shettleworth ). · p. 43High-elaborating mothers may have passed on the genes that are responsible for high elaboration to their offspring.
“For example, high-elaborating mothers may have passed on the genes that are responsible for high elaboration to their offspring.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ ( Atance & Meltzoff ; Shettleworth ). · p. 43Learning how to broadcast and understanding others' broadcasts are important, but that does not mean that it induces the other abilities involved in mental time travel.
“Learning how to broadcast and understanding others' broadcasts are no doubt important. But that does not mean that it induces the other abilities we propose are involved in mental time travel.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ ( Atance & Meltzoff ; Shettleworth ). · p. 42Young children first begin to refer to small parts of past events and, gradually, with the help of their caregivers, turn them into full narratives.
“This literature has documented how young children first begin to refer to small parts of past events and, gradually, with the help of their caregivers, turn them into full narratives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ R5.2. New data on animal foresight · p. 44An alternative explanation for the caching is that the birds based the caching, not on anticipated hunger, but on a general heuristic to balance food sources, based on previous experience of imbalance.
“An alternative, perhaps, is that the birds based the caching, not on anticipated hunger, but on a general heuristic to balance food sources, based on previous experience of imbalance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ R5.2. New data on animal foresight · p. 44Many species secure future needs, whether in food caching, nest building, or migration.
“Many species secure future needs, whether in food caching, nest building, or migration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ R5.2. New data on animal foresight · p. 44In Raby et al. (2007), eight scrub jays received breakfast in one cage and no breakfast in another cage, on alternating days; when later given the opportunity to store food while currently satiated, they cached more in the place where no breakfast was to be expected.
“In this study, eight scrub jays received breakfast in one cage and no breakfast in another cage, on alternating days. When later given the opportunity to store food while currently satiated, they cached more in the place where no breakfast was to be expected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Raby et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ ( Atance & Meltzoff ; Shettleworth ). · p. 43Children's mental time travel may be initially more influenced by talk about the past than the future, and the Future-first hypothesis may hold only for evolution rather than for development.
“Perhaps children's mental time travel is initially more influenced by talk about the past than the future, as Nelson claims, and the Futurefirst hypothesis may hold only for evolution rather than for development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ ( Atance & Meltzoff ; Shettleworth ). · p. 43The self in the present may be a prerequisite of mental time travel, whereas a temporally extended sense of self may be its consequence.
“In Suddendorf & Corballis (1997), we note, for example, that the self in the present may be a prerequisite of mental time travel, whereas a temporally extended sense of self may be its consequence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suddendorf & Corballis 1997
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ ( Atance & Meltzoff ; Shettleworth ). · p. 43The relation between these abilities may be multidimensional and involve other factors.
“The relation between these abilities may be multidimensional and involve other factors (e.g. such as in the Theory-of-mind hypothesis).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ ( Atance & Meltzoff ; Shettleworth ). · p. 43Nonhuman animals cannot anticipate future need states they do not directly experience (the Bischof-Kohler hypothesis).
“they maintain the hypothesis that we named after them ( Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis ): that nonhuman animals cannot anticipate future need states they do not directly experience (Suddendorf & Corballis 1997).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suddendorf & Corballis 1997
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ R5.1. Are behavioral tests possible? · p. 44It has been argued that the development of mental time travel is not uniform, but that there are individual and cultural differences in the way children first acquire mental time travel.
“It has certainly been argued that this development is not uniform, but that there are individual and cultural differences in the way children first acquire mental time travel (see Nelson ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nelson
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ R5.1. Are behavioral tests possible? · p. 44It is not yet clear whether human children develop mental time travel in a predictable fashion.
“However, it is not yet clear whether or not this is so.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ R5.2. New data on animal foresight · p. 44The Bischof-Kohler hypothesis cannot be true in the superficial sense that food caching is directed toward future gratification.
“As we acknowledged in the target article, the BischofKo ¨ hler hypothesis cannot be true in the superficial sense that food caching is directed toward future gratification.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ R5.3. Continuity in animal competence · p. 45Various deficits in the components we discuss could limit mental time travel (Multiple limits hypothesis).
“we put forward the theater metaphor and suggest that various deficits in the components we discuss could limit mental time travel ( Multiple limits hypothesis ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ R5.3. Continuity in animal competence · p. 46We might be missing out on instructive information about the systematic failures of nonhuman animals.
“but we might be missing out on instructive information about the systematic failures of nonhuman animals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitation§ R5.2. New data on animal foresight · p. 45The repeated exposure to the conditions means that associative learning could possibly explain the results.
“As Shettleworth (2007) noted, however, the repeated exposure to the conditions means that associative learning could possibly explain the results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shettleworth 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ R5.3. Continuity in animal competence · p. 45Such models have to explain why there are dissociations between different kinds of prospection and how they come about.
“But such models have to explain why there are dissociations between different kinds of prospection and how they come about.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ R5.3. Continuity in animal competence · p. 46Negative findings are seldom published, and hence Osvath & Gardenfors' observation that most studies have reported positive results for animal foresight may not be surprising.
“Note that negative findings are seldom published, and hence Osvath & Ga ¨ rdenfors' observation that most studies have reported positive results for animal foresight may not be surprising.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ R5.4. The future of animal studies of mental time travel · p. 46Premack and Woodruff's 1978 Behavioral and Brain Sciences article on theory of mind sparked comparative research that led to real progress and productive research areas in developmental psychology and other disciplines.
“The article sparked a flurry of comparative research that has led to real progress.”
- Also stated in: § R5.4. The future of animal studies of mental time travel · p. 46 · hedged
“In the process, it kick-started perhaps one of the most productive research areas in developmental psychology and galvanized research in neuroscience, philosophy, and other disciplines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Premack and Woodruff's (1978) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § R5.4. The future of animal studies of mental time travel · p. 46 · hedged
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ R5.2. New data on animal foresight · p. 44There remains a nagging suspicion that the flexible behavior associated with caching in scrub jays is restricted to the particular speciality of food storage.
“In all this, however, there remains also the nagging suspicion that the flexible behavior associated with caching in scrub jays is restricted to the particular speciality of food storage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Study design and conductreasoning§ R5.2. New data on animal foresight · p. 44To conclude that the jays were planning for the next morning rather than having acquired a more general rule, these two conditions would need to be compared rather than amalgamated.
“To conclude that the jays were planning for the next morning rather than having acquired a more general rule, these two conditions would need to be compared rather than amalgamated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ R5.3. Continuity in animal competence · p. 45These data do not challenge the Bischof-Kohler hypothesis, and it remains unclear how such relatively brief delay of gratification relates to the flexible capacity of humans to travel mentally to any future scenarios.
“But these data do not challenge the Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis, and it remains unclear how such relatively brief delay of gratification relates to the flexible capacity of humans to travel mentally to any future scenarios, be they a year or only a few minutes away.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ R6. Mental time travel and evolutionary psychology · p. 46Foresight has played a major role in human survival, providing unparalleled flexibility in adaptive and proactive behavior.
“We certainly think that foresight has played a major role in human survival, providing us with unparalleled flexibility in adaptive and proactive behavior (the Flexibility hypothesis).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Humans can travel mentally in time.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ R5.2. New data on animal foresight · p. 45Although the task may tap an important difference between procedural and declarative memory, no mental time travel may be involved.
“Thus, although the task may tap an important difference between procedural and declarative memory, no mental time travel may be involved.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ R5.3. Continuity in animal competence · p. 45A case for quantitative differences in mental time travel could still be made.
“Nonetheless, a case for quantitative differences in mental time travel could still be made (e.g., Carr & Viskontas ; Hurford et al. ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Carr & Viskontas
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hurford et al.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ R5.3. Continuity in animal competence · p. 45Some of the proposals we discuss could be regarded as setting quantitative limits.
“In fact, some of the proposals we discuss could be regarded as setting quantitative limits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ R5.3. Continuity in animal competence · p. 45The idea that foresight is based on a continuum runs counter to the case we made for the Prospection systems hypothesis.
“Second, the idea that foresight is based on a continuum runs counter to the case we made for the Prospection systems hypothesis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ R5.3. Continuity in animal competence · p. 45The difference between being and not being limited in such a way could amount to a qualitative shift - without future need anticipation, there is little point in considering any genuinely remote future events.
“The difference between being and not being limited in such a way could of course amount to a qualitative shift - without future need anticipation, there is little point in considering any genuinely remote future events.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ R5.2. New data on animal foresight · p. 44If the same animals pass different versions of such tasks (involving different contexts and needs), then this evidence for flexibility would make the Bischof-Kohler hypothesis increasingly untenable.
“As we noted previously, if the same animals pass different versions of such tasks (involving different contexts and needs), then this evidence for flexibility would make the Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis increasingly untenable (Suddendorf & Busby 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suddendorf & Busby 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ R5.2. New data on animal foresight · p. 45Over repeated trials two squirrel monkeys (but not rats) gradually reversed their natural preference for four pieces of dates over one piece, when choosing four pieces resulted in provision of water after a long delay (3 hours), and choosing one piece was followed by water supply after a short delay (1/2 hour).
“They found that over repeated trials two squirrel monkeys (but not rats) gradually reversed their natural preference for four pieces of dates over one piece, when choosing four pieces resulted in provision of water after a long delay (3 hours), and choosing one piece was followed by water supply after a short delay (1 / 2 hour).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Naqshbandi and Roberts 2006
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ R5.3. Continuity in animal competence · p. 45Children can delay gratification for longer when the salience of the reward is decreased, suggesting that the extent of the delay reflects inhibition or executive control, rather than the capacity to travel mentally to the future event per se.
“Research with children (e.g., Mischel & Mischel 1983) suggests that they can delay gratification for longer when the salience of the reward is decreased (e.g., when looking at a photo of the reward rather than at the actual reward), suggesting that the extent of the delay reflects inhibition or executive control, rather than the capacity to travel mentally to the future event per se.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mischel & Mischel 1983
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ R5.4. The future of animal studies of mental time travel · p. 46Research on mental time travel in animals, including the questions raised by the authors, has been very productive.
“recent work on mental time travel in animals has been very productive indeed (in addition to our review, see also Dere et al. 2006; Roberts 2006; Zentall 2006).”
- Also stated in: § R5.4. The future of animal studies of mental time travel · p. 46 · boosted
“there can be little argument that the questions we have raised have sparked very productive research programs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Dere et al. 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Roberts 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zentall 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § R5.4. The future of animal studies of mental time travel · p. 46 · boosted
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ R5.2. New data on animal foresight · p. 45Fornix-dissected rats fail on the 'recall' task, yet still succeed on a 'recognition' task.
“Fornixdissected rats fail on the 'recall' task, yet still succeed on a 'recognition' task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eacott & Easton
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ R5.3. Continuity in animal competence · p. 45The Multiple limits hypothesis suggests that species might be limited by a variety of other deficits that may have both quantitative and qualitative effects.
“The Multiple limits hypothesis suggests that species might be limited by a variety of other deficits that may have both quantitative and qualitative effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ R5.3. Continuity in animal competence · p. 45Bar's suggestion that even human mental time travel may reduce to associations neglects the inventive component of human imagination, just as animal communication fails to display the generativity of human language.
“Bar suggests that even human mental time travel may reduce to associations, but this again neglects the inventive component of human imagination, just as animal communication fails to display the generativity of human language.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ R5.3. Continuity in animal competence · p. 45It remains to be established what exactly the nature and extent of modern apes' foresight (and that of other animals) is.
“we acknowledged that 'it remains to be established what exactly the nature and extent of modern apes' foresight (and that of other animals) is' (target article, sect. 3.3, para. 7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites target article
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ R5.2. New data on animal foresight · p. 45One explanation for the gradual reversal of choice from four pieces of dates to one piece would be that the monkeys took their future thirst into account.
“Thus, one explanation for the gradual reversal of choice from four pieces of dates to one piece would be that the monkeys took their future thirst into account (i.e., evidence against the BischofKo ¨ hler hypothesis).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ R5.3. Continuity in animal competence · p. 45The causality may well be the other way around: Mental time travel makes human lives more complex than those of animals.
“In response, we note first that the causality may well be the other way around: Mental time travel makes human lives more complex than those of animals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ R5.3. Continuity in animal competence · p. 45We cannot prove the Stuck-in-time hypothesis.
“We are of course also not convinced and acknowledge that we cannot prove the Stuck-in-time hypothesis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoning§ R5.2. New data on animal foresight · p. 44The issue of need in this context is not about seeing the apparatus, but about the internal motivational state, and these were neither controlled nor manipulated.
“The issue of need in this context is not about seeing the apparatus, but about the internal motivational state (see also Bischof-Ko ¨hler & Bischof ), and we merely observed that these were neither controlled nor manipulated”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ R5.2. New data on animal foresight · p. 45Eating dates induces thirst, and subsequently not having access to something to drink for a while causes discomfort.
“Eating dates induces thirst, and subsequently not having access to something to drink for a while causes discomfort.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ R6. Mental time travel and evolutionary psychology · p. 46Humans have a long history of carrying diverse sets of tools in preparation for future happenings.
“Consider, for example, the long history of humans carrying with them diverse sets of tools in preparation for future happenings (e.g., Suddendorf 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suddendorf 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ R5.2. New data on animal foresight · p. 44It remains to be seen whether this ability is available to jays in other contexts.
“We agree with Shettleworth (2007) that it remains to be seen whether this ability is available to jays in other contexts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shettleworth 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ R5.3. Continuity in animal competence · p. 45There is something unique about human mental time travel (the Uniqueness hypothesis).
“We believe that there is something unique about human mental time travel (the Uniqueness hypothesis)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ R5.4. The future of animal studies of mental time travel · p. 46The authors' analyses provided a theoretical framework for Raby et al.'s work.
“As Raby et al. acknowledge at the beginning of their commentary, our analyses have provided a theoretical framework for their work.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Raby et al. (2007)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ R5.3. Continuity in animal competence · p. 45The clever experiments we discussed in the previous section suggest that nonhuman animals may have some competence, and future research may well whittle away at some suggested limits.
“The clever experiments we discussed in the previous section suggest that nonhuman animals may have some competence, and future research may well whittle away at some suggested limits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ R5.2. New data on animal foresight · p. 45We can recall that Wellington is the capital of New Zealand, but that is because we know it, not because we can remember being told it.
“We can recall that Wellington is the capital of New Zealand, but that is because we know it, not because we can remember being told it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ R5.2. New data on animal foresight · p. 45Comparing the neuronal implementation of analog behavior such as that between rats and humans may hold vital information to clarifying the component processes of the Theater hypothesis.
“Nonetheless, comparing the neuronal implementation of analog behavior such as that between rats and humans, as Buckner submits, may hold vital information to clarifying the component processes of the Theater hypothesis”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ R5.4. The future of animal studies of mental time travel · p. 46In the context of human mind evolution, convergent evolution of some capacities (as perhaps in jays) may be less relevant than potentially homologous abilities of our closest living primate relatives.
“In this context, convergent evolution of some capacities (as perhaps in jays) may be less relevant than the potentially homologous abilities of our closest living primate relatives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ R5.3. Continuity in animal competence · p. 45The Bischof-Kohler hypothesis suggests a limit to the extent of foresight (i.e., anticipation of future needs).
“The Bischof-Ko ¨hler hypothesis, for example, suggests a limit to the extent of foresight (i.e., anticipation of future needs).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ R6. Mental time travel and evolutionary psychology · p. 47The cognitive arms race seems to have persisted longer in humans than in other primates, resulting in apparently unique cognitive skills, including perhaps mental time travel.
“One problem for such an account is to explain why the cognitive arms race seems to have persisted longer in humans than in other primates, resulting in apparently unique cognitive skills, including, perhaps, mental time travel”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ R6. Mental time travel and evolutionary psychology · p. 47Ecological dominance may have led our ancestors down a different path of intergroup competition, resulting in the emergence of language, theory of mind, mental time travel, and so forth.
“This 'ecological dominance' may have led our ancestors down a different path of intergroup competition, resulting in the emergence of language, theory of mind, mental time travel, and so forth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ R6. Mental time travel and evolutionary psychology · p. 47Modern history contains cases of explicit social engineering, such as Marxism, implemented based on plans for future change.
“In modern history there are certainly cases of explicit social engineering where, say, Marxism was implemented based on plans for future change.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ R6. Mental time travel and evolutionary psychology · p. 47In one study, Chinese autobiographical memories were more social than those of U.S. participants, who recalled more events oriented towards the self.
“For example, in one study Chinese autobiographical memories were more social than those of U.S. participants who recalled more events oriented towards the self (Conway et al. 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Conway et al. 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ R7. Conclusion · p. 47The commentaries signal an increased multidisciplinary interest in mental time travel.
“In conclusion, the commentaries signal an increased multidisciplinary interest in mental time travel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ R6. Mental time travel and evolutionary psychology · p. 47The evidence presented does not imply that Darwinian cultural evolution is a lost cause.
“Wealso agree that this does not imply that Darwinian cultural evolution is a lost cause.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ R6. Mental time travel and evolutionary psychology · p. 47There are many parallels between cultural and biological evolution worth considering, even if there are important differences.
“As Mesoudi et al. (2006) have shown, there are many parallels between cultural and biological evolution that are worth considering, even if there are also important differences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mesoudi et al. (2006)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ R6. Mental time travel and evolutionary psychology · p. 47Culture and language may influence the way people travel mentally in time.
“In turn, of course, culture and language may also influence the way people travel mentally in time, as Nelson points out.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nelson
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ R6. Mental time travel and evolutionary psychology · p. 47Many aspects of human culture are not top-down but bottom-up related to our shared ability to reconstruct past and imagine future events.
“We suspect that many aspects of human culture are not top-down, but bottom-up related to our shared ability to reconstruct past and imagine future events.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ R6. Mental time travel and evolutionary psychology · p. 47Cultures may determine what is important to remember or anticipate.
“For example, cultures may determine what it is that is important to remember or to anticipate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown data§ R6. Mental time travel and evolutionary psychology · p. 47The evidence presented by the authors makes simple denial that humans have foresight untenable.
“We agree that the evidence we present makes simple denial that humans have foresight an untenable escape.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ R6. Mental time travel and evolutionary psychology · p. 47Once early hominins obtained a certain level of ecological dominance, they faced increased competition from their own species.
“A potential explanation, suggested by Alexander and colleagues (Alexander 1989; Flinn et al. 2005), is that once early hominins obtained a certain level of 'ecological dominance,' . . . they were faced with increased competition from their own species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Alexander 1989
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Flinn et al. 2005
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ R6. Mental time travel and evolutionary psychology · p. 47People of all cultures, with the possible but controversial exception of the Piraha, can plan for next week and remember what happened last week.
“People of all cultures, with the possible but controversial exception of an Amazonian tribe, the Piraha (Everett 2005), can plan for next week and can remember what happened last week.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Everett 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ R6. Mental time travel and evolutionary psychology · p. 46The capacity for mental time travel appears necessary for the emergence of civilizations.
“The capacity for mental time travel would on the face of it appear to be necessary for the emergence of civilizations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Humans can travel mentally in time.
The paper relies on this without support.
Phenomenological experience is a private mental capacity that may never be knowable in another organism.
“Phenomenological experience, though, is a private mental capacity, and one may rightfully wonder if one could ever know of another organism's mental world.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
For mental time travel to have evolved, there must have been some effect on survival or reproduction for natural selection to work on.
“Nevertheless, for mental time travel to have evolved, there must have been something natural selection could work on, that is, some effect on survival or reproduction (unless it was merely an accidental side effect of some other adaptation).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The adaptive advantage of any memory system can only lie in what it contributes for future survival.
“The adaptive advantage of any memory system can only lie in what it contributes for future survival.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The human encephalization quotient is about three times that of the chimpanzee.
“The human EQ is about three times that of the chimpanzee.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The hippocampus is a primary site for episodic memory in humans.
“a finding that is also consistent with the hippocampus being a primary site for episodic memory in humans.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The apes in the Mulcahy and Call studies had a desire for grape rewards throughout testing.
“The studies did not control or manipulate the drive or need state of the subjects, and it is not unreasonable to assume that they all had a desire for grape rewards throughout testing (Suddendorf 2006).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Behavior that increases future survival has a selective advantage.
“Because behavior that increases future survival has a selective advantage”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Animals, when experiencing conflicting needs, cannot but follow the strongest need and suppress the others.
“Animals, when experiencing contradicting needs, cannot but follow the strongest need and suppress the others.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The potential for frame-of-reference awareness is beyond the grasp of even the great apes.
“We postulate that the potential for this awareness is beyond the grasp of even the great apes and thus a core constituent of the human condition.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Nonhuman animals can use simple predictions based on associations, learning from experience and applying it in the future.
“it is clear that they can use simple predictions that are based on associations (i.e., they learn from experience and apply it in the future).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The hippocampus is phylogenetically among the oldest parts of the brain.
“The hippocampus is phylogenetically among the oldest parts of the brain”
The paper relies on this without support.
In machine learning, rote learning is an inefficient strategy.
“In machine learning, rote learning is an inefficient strategy”
The paper relies on this without support.
The purpose of any learning task is to make generalization possible.
“The purpose of any learning task is to make generalization possible”
The paper relies on this without support.
A good way to perform induction is to aggregate experience into structures such as prototypes or clusters.
“A good way to perform induction is to aggregate experience into structures such as prototypes or clusters”
The paper relies on this without support.
Storing particular instances generally makes sense if they are statistically representative.
“Storing particular instances (e.g., cluster centers) generally makes sense if they are statistically representative”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The intact recognition ability of fornix-transected rats was mediated by intact familiarity processes.
“As these animals had impaired recall, we can assume that their intact recognition ability was mediated by intact familiarity processes”
The paper relies on this without support.
Events never repeat themselves exactly.
“to the extent that events never repeat themselves exactly”
The paper relies on this without support.
MTT plays a decisive part in human life and society.
“Undoubtedly MTT plays a decisive part in human life and society”
The paper relies on this without support.
Social interaction within many species is very strong.
“Social interaction within many species is very strong.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The hand-to-mouth lifestyle of great apes does not apply to humans.
“The hand-to-mouth lifestyle of great apes does not apply to humans.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is not possible to know exactly where the next fresh kill will be found.
“It is not possible to know exactly where the next fresh kill will be found”
The paper relies on this without support.
Without sharp-edged stone tools in immediate vicinity, a carcass would lose much of its value.
“Without sharp-edged stone tools in the immediate vicinity, a carcass would lose much of its value.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Mental time travel requires self-awareness.
“MTT requires self-awareness.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Theory of mind is an advanced cognitive capacity often attributed to humans only.
“ToM is also considered an advanced cognitive capacity often attributed to humans only.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Larger, more recently evolved systems can perform feats that smaller, more ancestral ones cannot.
“larger, more recently evolved systems can perform feats that smaller, more ancestral ones cannot.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is impossible to know for certain what another human's mental experience is like.
“We can also never know for certain what even another human's mental experience is like (language or not), but that does not stop us studying the mind (though it did during the behaviorist era).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Humans can travel mentally in time.
“Since humans can travel mentally in time, the natural question of whether nonhuman animals can do so, too, can inspire the pursuit of more detailed analyses of animal capacities.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In predictive coding frameworks, predictions and prediction errors interact over rapid (synchronic) timescales providing a constitutive basis for the corresponding perceptions, cognitions, and actions.
“in predictive coding frameworks, predictions and prediction errors interact over rapid (synchronic) timescales providing a constitutive basis for the corresponding perceptions, cognitions, and actions”
From An Interoceptive Predictive Coding Model of Conscious Presence (2012) · cites this paper as Suddendorf and Corballis, 2007
The taxonomy of future-oriented cognition (p. 2) discusses stimulus-driven predictions of future events, and the Bayesian commentary (p. 26) discusses estimating future values. Neither addresses predictive coding, interactions between predictions and prediction errors on rapid timescales, or their proposed constitutive role in perception, cognition, and action. Searches for “predictive coding” and “prediction errors” found no passage establishing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIt is difficult to draw any conclusion from these studies of whether episodic-like memory is restricted to evolved behaviours or whether it is analogous to the generalizability observed in human episodic memory.
“Therefore, it is difficult to draw any conclusion from these studies of whether episodic-like memory is restricted to evolved behaviours or whether it is analogous to the generalizability observed in human episodic memory [48].”
From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [48]
Construction of detached probabilistic scenes has been argued to influence ongoing decision making by estimating outcomes of behavioral choices.
“Indeed, construction of detached probabilistic scenes has been argued to influence ongoing decision making by estimating outcomes of behavioral choices (Boyer 2008; Suddendorf and Corballis 2007; Schilbach et al. 2008b).”
From Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy (2012) · cites this paper as Suddendorf and Corballis 2007
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 237 · Cited by 2,031
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- 10.1644/1545-1542(2001)0822.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1002/1096-8644(200103)114:33.0.CO;2-I · DOI
- Corballis, none, Cognitive Science, none, none
- Leaver, none, Animal Cognition, none, none
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199806)106:23.0.CO;2-L · DOI
- Holden, 2005, Science, 308, 1110
- Thompson, 1969, Communications in Behavioral Biology, 4, 29
- Suddendorf, 1997, Genetic Social and General Psychology Monographs, 123, 133
- Osvath, 2005, Lund University Cognitive Studies, 122, 1
- Authors
- Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Venue
- Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 299-313
- ISSN
- 0140-525X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1825
- OpenAlex
- W2165108227
- Semantic Scholar
- 9a98c622e6ca3470e9fb1e3ee59ecae85ec5112d
- Cited by
- 2,031
- References
- 237
- Citations by year
- 2026: 76 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 205 · 2019: 138 · 2018: 110 · 2017: 130 · 2016: 120 · 2015: 118 · 2014: 111 · 2013: 101 · 2012: 101
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioral and Brain Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- mental time travel, prospection, episodic memory, memory systems, anticipatory behavior, planning, cognitive evolution, comparative cognition, non-human animals, theatrical metaphor
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Classification, Cognition, Biological Evolution, Forecasting, Humans, Memory, Mental Processes, Mental Recall
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review