What do we learn from the price of crude oil futures?
Open accessAbstract
Despite their widespread use as predictors of the spot price of oil, oil futures prices tend to be less accurate in the mean‐squared prediction error sense than no‐change forecasts. This result is driven by the variability of the futures price about the spot price, as captured by the oil futures spread. This variability can be explained by the marginal convenience yield of oil inventories. Using a two‐country, multi‐period general equilibrium model of the spot and futures markets for crude oil we show that increased uncertainty about future oil supply shortfalls under plausible assumptions causes the spread to decline. Increased uncertainty also causes precautionary demand for oil to increase, resulting in an immediate increase in the real spot price. Thus the negative of the oil futures spread may be viewed as an indicator of fluctuations in the price of crude oil driven by precautionary demand. An empirical analysis of this indicator provides evidence of how shifts in the uncertainty about future oil supply shortfalls affect the real spot price of crude oil. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An unexpected increase in the uncertainty about future oil supply shortfalls would have much the same effect as news about future oil supplies and demand.
“An unexpected increase in the uncertainty about future oil supply shortfalls would have much the same effect.This point has been demonstrated formally in a general equilibrium model by Alquist and Kilian (2010).”
From THE ROLE OF INVENTORIES AND SPECULATIVE TRADING IN THE GLOBAL MARKET FOR CRUDE OIL (2014) · cites this paper as Alquist and Kilian (2010)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
THE ROLE OF INVENTORIES AND SPECULATIVE TRADING IN THE GLOBAL MARKET FOR CRUDE OIL
Kilian, L., & Murphy, D. P. (2014) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.2322 · Cited by 1,481 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Role of Speculation in Oil Markets: What Have We Learned So Far?
Fattouh, B., Kilian, L., & Mahadeva, L. (2013) · The Energy Journal · doi:10.5547/01956574.34.3.2 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Self-citationOil Prices and Stock Markets: A Review of the Theory and Empirical Evidence
Degiannakis, S., Filis, G., & Arora, V. (2018) · The Energy Journal · doi:10.5547/01956574.39.5.sdeg · Cited by 298 · see citing works
- Authors
- Alquist, R., & Kilian, L.
- Affiliations
- Bank of Canada (CA)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kilian, Lutz
- ORCID
- Kilian, Lutz
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Econometrics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-05-04
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 539-573
- ISSN
- 0883-7252 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1255
- OpenAlex
- W2139116473
- Cited by
- 744
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 48
- FWCI
- 116.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Econometrics (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Market Dynamics and Volatility
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
- Keywords
- crude oil futures, oil spot prices, convenience yield, oil inventories, precautionary demand, general equilibrium model, oil price forecasting, mean squared prediction error
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review