Cited by 744Market Dynamics and VolatilityEconomics of Agriculture and Food MarketsEnergy, Environment, and Transportation Policies

What do we learn from the price of crude oil futures?

Open access
Alquist, Ron, Kilian, Lutz·2010·Journal of Applied Econometrics

Abstract

Despite their widespread use as predictors of the spot price of oil, oil futures prices tend to be less accurate in the mean‐squared prediction error sense than no‐change forecasts. This result is driven by the variability of the futures price about the spot price, as captured by the oil futures spread. This variability can be explained by the marginal convenience yield of oil inventories. Using a two‐country, multi‐period general equilibrium model of the spot and futures markets for crude oil we show that increased uncertainty about future oil supply shortfalls under plausible assumptions causes the spread to decline. Increased uncertainty also causes precautionary demand for oil to increase, resulting in an immediate increase in the real spot price. Thus the negative of the oil futures spread may be viewed as an indicator of fluctuations in the price of crude oil driven by precautionary demand. An empirical analysis of this indicator provides evidence of how shifts in the uncertainty about future oil supply shortfalls affect the real spot price of crude oil. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jae.1159

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An unexpected increase in the uncertainty about future oil supply shortfalls would have much the same effect as news about future oil supplies and demand.

    “An unexpected increase in the uncertainty about future oil supply shortfalls would have much the same effect.This point has been demonstrated formally in a general equilibrium model by Alquist and Kilian (2010).”

    From THE ROLE OF INVENTORIES AND SPECULATIVE TRADING IN THE GLOBAL MARKET FOR CRUDE OIL (2014) · cites this paper as Alquist and Kilian (2010)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alquist, R., & Kilian, L.
Affiliations
  • Bank of Canada (CA)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Kilian, Lutz
Venue
Journal of Applied Econometrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-05-04
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
539-573
ISSN
  • 0883-7252 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1255
OpenAlex
W2139116473
Cited by
744
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 48
FWCI
116.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Econometrics (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Market Dynamics and Volatility
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Keywords
crude oil futures, oil spot prices, convenience yield, oil inventories, precautionary demand, general equilibrium model, oil price forecasting, mean squared prediction error

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review