Cited by 493Market Dynamics and VolatilityEconomics of Agriculture and Food MarketsFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies

The Role of Speculation in Oil Markets: What Have We Learned So Far?

Open access
Fattouh, Bassam, Kilian, Lutz, Mahadeva, Lavan·2013·The Energy Journal

Abstract

A popular view is that the surge in the real price of oil during 2003-08 cannot be explained by economic fundamentals, but was caused by the increased financialization of oil futures markets, which in turn allowed speculation to become a major determinant of the spot price of oil. This interpretation has been driving policy efforts to tighten the regulation of oil derivatives markets. This survey reviews the evidence supporting this view. We identify six strands in the literature and discuss to what extent each sheds light on the role of speculation. We find that the existing evidence is not supportive of an important role of speculation in driving the spot price of oil after 2003. Instead, there is strong evidence that the co-movement between spot and futures prices reflects common economic fundamentals rather than the financialization of oil futures markets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5547/01956574.34.3.2

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The distinction between normal speculation and excessive speculation is moot because there is no speculation in the physical market at all.

    “the evidence in Figure 2 suggests that the distinction between normal speculation and speculation that is excessive is moot, for if there is no speculation in the physical market at all there cannot have been excessive speculation either under any definition.”

    From THE ROLE OF INVENTORIES AND SPECULATIVE TRADING IN THE GLOBAL MARKET FOR CRUDE OIL (2014) · cites this paper as Fattouh et al. (2013)

  • This implication is fully consistent with other, more direct evidence on the potential impact of financial investors on oil futures prices.

    “This implication is fully consistent with other, more direct evidence on the potential impact of financial investors on oil futures prices (seeFattouh et al., 2013).”

    From THE ROLE OF INVENTORIES AND SPECULATIVE TRADING IN THE GLOBAL MARKET FOR CRUDE OIL (2014) · cites this paper as Fattouh et al., 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fattouh, B., Kilian, L., & Mahadeva, L.
Affiliations
  • SOAS University of London (GB)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 57 Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6FA, UK..
Venue
The Energy Journal
Published
2013-07
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
7-33
ISSN
  • 0195-6574 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9089
OpenAlex
W2118985681
Cited by
491
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 33
FWCI
126.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Energy Journal (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Market Dynamics and Volatility
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Keywords
oil speculation, oil futures market, financialization, oil prices, economic fundamentals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review