The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diagnostic tests for models based on individual data: A survey
Abstract
This paper surveys the growing literature on diagnostic testing of models based on unit record data. We argue that while many of these tests are produced in a Lagrange multiplier framework they are often more readily derived, and more easily applied, if approached from the conditional moment testing view of Newey (1985) and Tauchen (1985). In addition we propose some new tests based on comparisons of parametric estimators with nonparametric estimators which are consistent under certain forms of misspecification. To illustrate the utility of the tests we employ them in the examination of some existing published studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_25 · Cited by 45,181
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779
Specification Tests in Econometrics
Hausman, J. A. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913827 · Cited by 18,820
Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators
Hansen, L. P. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912775 · Cited by 13,467
Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics
Maddala, G. S. (1983) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511810176 · Cited by 13,240
A Simple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation
Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911963 · Cited by 5,647
Self-citationMaximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models
White, H. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912526 · Cited by 4,098
Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models
White, H. (1983) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912004 · Cited by 3,674
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B)
Fildes, R. (1993) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(93)90088-5 · Cited by 3,437
Cited by
(2001) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 27,577
Estimating Models with Sample Selection Bias: A Survey
Vella, F. (1998) · The Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.2307/146317 · Cited by 1,007
Self-citationProtection for Sale: An Empirical Investigation
Goldberg, P. K., & Maggi, G. (1999) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.89.5.1135 · Cited by 854
Using least squares and tobit in second stage DEA efficiency analyses
McDonald, J. (2009) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.07.039 · Cited by 734
ALTERNATIVE ESTIMATING AND TESTING EMPIRICAL STRATEGIES FOR FRACTIONAL REGRESSION MODELS
Ramalho, E. A., Ramalho, J. J. S., & Murteira, J. M. R. (2011) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00602.x · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Pagan, A., & Vella, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Econometrics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-12
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S29-S59
- ISSN
- 0883-7252 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1255
- OpenAlex
- W2079923236
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 17.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic tests for models based on individual data: A survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jae.3950040504
- The paper
- Pagan, A., & Vella, F. (1989). Diagnostic tests for models based on individual data: A survey. Journal of Applied Econometrics. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.3950040504
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.