The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New frontiers for arch models
Abstract
In the 20 years following the publication of the ARCH model, there has been a vast quantity of research uncovering the properties of competing volatility models. Wide‐ranging applications to financial data have discovered important stylized facts and illustrated both the strengths and weaknesses of the models. There are now many surveys of this literature. This paper looks forward to identify promising areas of new research. The paper lists five new frontiers. It briefly discusses three—high‐frequency volatility models, large‐scale multivariate ARCH models, and derivatives pricing models. Two further frontiers are examined in more detail—application of ARCH models to the broad class of non‐negative processes, and use of Least Squares Monte Carlo to examine non‐linear properties of any model that can be simulated. Using this methodology, the paper analyses more general types of ARCH models, stochastic volatility models, long‐memory models and breaking volatility models. The volatility of volatility is defined, estimated and compared with option‐implied volatilities. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Engle, R. F. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912773 · Cited by 20,795
Self-citation
Cited by
25 years of time series forecasting
De Gooijer, J. G., & Hyndman, R. J. (2006) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.01.001 · Cited by 1,587
Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., & Diebold, F. X. (2007) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.89.4.701 · Cited by 1,445
GENERALIZED AUTOREGRESSIVE SCORE MODELS WITH APPLICATIONS
Creal, D., Koopman, S. J., & Lucas, A. (2013) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.1279 · Cited by 981
Human insula activation reflects risk prediction errors as well as risk
Preuschoff, K., Quartz, S. R., & Bossaerts, P. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4286-07.2008 · Cited by 784
Risk and Volatility: Econometric Models and Financial Practice
Engle, R. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828041464597 · Cited by 554
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Engle, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Econometrics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 425-446
- ISSN
- 0883-7252 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1255
- OpenAlex
- W2094006360
- Cited by
- 737
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.