Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,445

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Roughing It Up: Including Jump Components in the Measurement, Modeling, and Forecasting of Return Volatility

Andersen, Torben G., Bollerslev, Tim, Diebold, Francis X.·2007·Review of Economics and Statistics

Abstract

A growing literature documents important gains in asset return volatility forecasting via use of realized variation measures constructed from high-frequency returns. We progress by using newly developed bipower variation measures and corresponding nonparametric tests for jumps. Our empirical analyses of exchange rates, equity index returns, and bond yields suggest that the volatility jump component is both highly important and distinctly less persistent than the continuous component, and that separating the rough jump moves from the smooth continuous moves results in significant out-of-sample volatility forecast improvements. Moreover, many of the significant jumps are associated with specific macroeconomic news announcements.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/rest.89.4.701

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,445

Metadata

Authors
Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., & Diebold, F. X.
Venue
Review of Economics and Statistics
Published
2007-11
Volume
89
Issue
4
Pages
701-720
ISSN
  • 0034-6535 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9142
OpenAlex
W3125987794
Cited by
1,445
References
0
FWCI
99.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Roughing It Up: Including Jump Components in the Measurement, Modeling, and Forecasting of Return Volatility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/rest.89.4.701
The paper
Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., & Diebold, F. X. (2007). Roughing It Up: Including Jump Components in the Measurement, Modeling, and Forecasting of Return Volatility. Review of Economics and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.89.4.701

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.