Cited by 12,787Spatial and Panel Data AnalysisMonetary Policy and Economic ImpactDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies

A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence

Open access
Pesaran, M. Hashem·2007·Journal of Applied Econometrics

Abstract

A number of panel unit root tests that allow for cross‐section dependence have been proposed in the literature that use orthogonalization type procedures to asymptotically eliminate the cross‐dependence of the series before standard panel unit root tests are applied to the transformed series. In this paper we propose a simple alternative where the standard augmented Dickey–Fuller (ADF) regressions are augmented with the cross‐section averages of lagged levels and first‐differences of the individual series. New asymptotic results are obtained both for the individual cross‐sectionally augmented ADF (CADF) statistics and for their simple averages. It is shown that the individual CADF statistics are asymptotically similar and do not depend on the factor loadings. The limit distribution of the average CADF statistic is shown to exist and its critical values are tabulated. Small sample properties of the proposed test are investigated by Monte Carlo experiments. The proposed test is applied to a panel of 17 OECD real exchange rate series as well as to log real earnings of households in the PSID data. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jae.951

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using the Pesaran (2007) panel unit-root test, the null of homogeneous nonstationarity is rejected for all variables.

    “Using the Pesaran (2007) panel unit-root test in the presence of cross-section dependence, we reject the null of homogeneous nonstationarity (i.e., all countries are non-stationary) for all variables.”

    From Consumer panic in the COVID-19 pandemic (2021) · cites this paper as Pesaran (2007)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pesaran, M. H.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Pesaran, M. Hashem
Venue
Journal of Applied Econometrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
265-312
ISSN
  • 0883-7252 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1255
OpenAlex
W3124091918
Cited by
12,787
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1692 · 2025: 1602 · 2024: 1601 · 2023: 1675 · 2022: 1439 · 2021: 1064 · 2020: 786 · 2019: 529 · 2018: 387 · 2017: 314 · 2016: 275 · 2015: 250 · 2014: 222 · 2013: 194 · 2012: 183
FWCI
280.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Econometrics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Keywords
panel unit root tests, cross-sectional dependence, asymptotic distribution, critical values, small sample properties, factor loadings, real exchange rate, household earnings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review