Cited by 7Economics of Agriculture and Food MarketsMarket Dynamics and VolatilityAgricultural economics and policies

Global shocks and local sellers: Kenyan fertilizer markets’ response to the fuel-fertilizer-food price crisis

Open access
Willwerth, Hanna S., Khaemba, Colleta N., Serra, Teresa, Michelson, Hope C., Rutsaert, Pieter, Donovan, Jason·2025·Food Policy

Abstract

Global fertilizer prices doubled during the 2020–2022 fuel-fertilizer-food crisis, pushing an additional 210 million people into acute food insecurity. We use transaction-level data from agro-dealers to analyze how this global shock transmitted through Kenyan retail markets. How global price shocks spread across rural markets to affect firms and farmers in low-income countries remains poorly understood. We show that retail fertilizer prices in Kenya rose 81% on average during the crisis, with remarkable spatial variation ranging from 5% decreases to 138% increases across shops. We use dyadic panel analysis to identify changes in price transmission and in market integration across Kenyan fertilizer retailers and to evaluate the effects of government policy intervention. We find evidence of asymmetric price transmission; agro-dealer prices responded faster to import price increases than decreases. We show that larger shops and major agricultural production zones experienced faster price transmission and stronger integration with import markets relative to high-poverty areas. Kenya’s National Fertilizer Subsidy Program slowed price transmission but may have prolonged higher fertilizer retail prices. Our results imply that farmers do not benefit as rapidly from input price reductions as they would under symmetric transmission. Our results also demonstrate that global shocks transmit unevenly across markets, suggesting effective stabilization policies should account for heterogeneity in market conditions and variable pass-through behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102889

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ariga, J., Jayne, T.S., 2011. Fertilizer in Kenya: Factors Driving the Increase in Usage by Smallholder Farmers. In: Yes Africa Can: Success Stories from a Dynamic Continent. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, pp. 269-288.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Willwerth, H. S., Khaemba, C. N., Serra, T., Michelson, H. C., Rutsaert, P., & Donovan, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (KE)
  • Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo (MX)
Corresponding author
Willwerth, Hanna S.
Venue
Food Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-05
Volume
133
Pages
102889
ISSN
0306-9192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411065419
Cited by
7
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1
FWCI
5.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • USAID (INV-003439)
  • Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Market Dynamics and Volatility
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
Keywords
fertilizer prices, price transmission, market integration, agro-dealers, food insecurity, import prices, Kenya, agricultural input prices, market heterogeneity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review