The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heterogeneity and cross section dependence in panel data models: theory and applications introduction
Open accessAbstract
The papers included in this special issue are primarily concerned with the problem of cross section dependence and heterogeneity in the analysis of panel data models and their relevance in applied econometric research. Cross section dependence can arise due to spatial or spill over effects, or could be due to unobserved (or unobservable) common factors. Much of the recent research on non‐stationary panel data have focussed on this problem. It was clear that the first generation panel unit root and cointegration tests developed in the 1990's, which assumed cross‐sectional independence, are inadequate and could lead to significant size distortions in the presence of neglected cross‐section dependence. Second generation panel unit root and cointegration tests that take account of possible cross‐section dependence in the data have been developed, see the recent surveys by Choi (2006) and Breitung and Pesaran (2007). The papers by Baltagi, Bresson and Pirotte, Choi and Chue, Kapetanios, and Pesaran in this special issue are further contributions to this literature. The papers by Fachin, and Moon and Perron are empirical studies in this area. Controlling for heterogeneity has also been an important concern for empirical researchers with panel data methods promising better handle on heterogeneity than cross‐section data methods. The papers by Hsiao, Shen, Wang and Weeks, Pedroni and Serlenga and Shin are empirical contributions to this area. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence
Pesaran, M. H. (2007) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.951 · Cited by 12,787
Self-citation
Cited by
Jahanger, A., Usman, M., Murshed, M., Mahmood, H., & Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2022) · Resources Policy · doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102569 · Cited by 710
Cross-Sectional Dependence in Panel Data Analysis
Sarafidis, V., & Wansbeek, T. (2012) · Econometric Reviews · doi:10.1080/07474938.2011.611458 · Cited by 497
Li, Y., Wang, X., Imran, A., Aslam, M. U., & Mehmood, U. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18882 · Cited by 43
Does the electric vehicle industry help achieve sustainable development goals?—evidence from China
Lu, P., Hamori, S., Sun, L., & Tian, S. (2024) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2023.1276382 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Baltagi, B. H., & Hashem Pesaran, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Econometrics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 229-232
- ISSN
- 0883-7252 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1255
- OpenAlex
- W1983639306
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.