The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The relationship between R&D collaboration, subsidies and R&D performance: Empirical evidence from Finland and Germany
Open accessAbstract
This study focuses on the impact of innovation policies and R&D collaboration in Germany and Finland. We consider collaboration and subsidies as heterogeneous treatments, and perform an econometric matching to analyze R&D and patent activity at the firm level. In general, we find that collaboration has positive effects. In Germany, subsidies for individual research do neither exhibit a significant impact on R&D nor on patenting, but the innovative performance could be improved by additional incentives for collaboration. For Finnish companies, public funding is an important source of finance for R&D. Without subsidies, recipients would show less R&D and patenting activity, whilst those firms not receiving subsidies would perform significantly better if they were publicly funded. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
ROSENBAUM, P. R., & RUBIN, D. B. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · Cited by 31,241
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805271 · Cited by 7,784
Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2233763 · Cited by 7,530
Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey
Griliches, Z. (1990) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w3301 · Cited by 5,828
Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator
Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. (1998) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-937x.00044 · Cited by 3,807
The Economics and Econometrics of Active Labor Market Programs
Heckman, J. J., Lalonde, R. J., & Smith, J. A. (1999) · Handbook of Labor Economics · doi:10.1016/s1573-4463(99)03012-6 · Cited by 3,059
Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs
Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (1999) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1999.10473858 · Cited by 2,395
Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data
Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J., & Todd, P. (1998) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2999630 · Cited by 2,286
Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly With Spillovers
d'Aspremont-Lynden, C., & Jacquemin, A. P. (1988) · American Economic Review · Cited by 2,024
The role of the propensity score in estimating dose-response functions
Imbens, G. (2000) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/87.3.706 · Cited by 1,776
Metadata
- Authors
- Czarnitzki, D., Ebersberger, B., & Fier, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Econometrics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1347-1366
- ISSN
- 0883-7252 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1255
- OpenAlex
- W2169976514
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 25.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relationship between R&D collaboration, subsidies and R&D performance: Empirical evidence from Finland and Germany. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jae.992
- The paper
- Czarnitzki, D., Ebersberger, B., & Fier, A. (2007). The relationship between R&D collaboration, subsidies and R&D performance: Empirical evidence from Finland and Germany. Journal of Applied Econometrics. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.992
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
