The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating market power in a two‐sided market: The case of newspapers
Abstract
The newspaper industry is a two‐sided market: the readers market and the advertising market are closely linked by inter‐market network externalities. We estimate market power in the Italian newspaper industry by building a structural model which encompasses a demand estimation for differentiated products on both sides of the market and where profit maximization by the publishing firms takes into account the interaction between them. The question that we address is whether the observed price pattern is consistent with profit‐maximizing behaviour by competing firms or is instead driven by some form of (tacit or explicit) coordinated practice. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets
Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1162/154247603322493212 · Cited by 5,642
Chicken & Egg: Competition among Intermediation Service Providers
Caillaud, B., & Jullien, B. (2003) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1593720 · Cited by 1,799
Cited by
Zhu, F., & Zhang, X. (. (2010) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.74.2.133 · Cited by 2,363
Poell, T., Nieborg, D., & van Dijck, J. (2019) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2019.4.1425 · Cited by 823
Chandra, A., & Kaiser, U. (2015) · Handbook of Media Economics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-62721-6.00009-3 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Argentesi, E., & Filistrucchi, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Econometrics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1247-1266
- ISSN
- 0883-7252 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1255
- OpenAlex
- W1979006156
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
