Cited by 61Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringNerve injury and regenerationTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Morphologic and functional evaluation of peripheral nerve fibers regenerated through polyimide sieve electrodes over long‐term implantation

Ceballos, Dolores, Valero‐Cabré, Antoni, Valderrama, Elena, Schüttler, Martin, Stieglitz, Thomas, Navarro, Xavier·2002·Journal of Biomedical Materials Research

Abstract

We evaluated by morphologic and functional analysis the regeneration of peripheral nerve fibers through polyimide regenerative-type electrodes over long-term implantation. Polyimide sieve electrodes were placed in silicone chambers and implanted between the severed ends of the sciatic nerve in rats. The sieve part had 281 round via holes of 40 microm in diameter, with nine integrated recording-stimulating electrodes arranged around the via holes. The degree of axonal regeneration was examined at 2, 7, and 12 months postimplantation (mpi). Regeneration was successful in 12 of the 13 animals implanted. Reinnervation of distal muscle and nerves increased with time, reaching a plateau about 7 mpi. The number of myelinated fibers increased from 2 to 7 months, at which time it was similar to control values. With time the myelinated fibers matured, with significant increases in axon diameter and myelin thickness. Only 0.6% of the regenerated axons showed evidence of compression near the implanted electrode. The majority of the myelinated fibers that crossed the via holes and had been regenerated through the distal nerve had a normal appearance. Sieve electrodes were useful for nerve stimulation at postimplantation. Stimulation through different active electrodes excited nerve bundles, evoking compound muscle action potentials of varying shape and amplitude, indicative of selective axonal stimulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbm.10099

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 61

Authors
Ceballos, D., Valero‐Cabré, A., Valderrama, E., Schüttler, M., Stieglitz, T., & Navarro, X.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Biomedical Engineering (DE)
Corresponding author
Navarro, Xavier
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-03-06
Volume
60
Issue
4
Pages
517-528
ISSN
  • 0021-9304 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4636
OpenAlex
W2053517954
Cited by
61
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Materials Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • FIS, Spain (00/0031-02)
  • ESPRIT (GRIP, #26322)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
peripheral nerve regeneration, nerve conduits, sciatic nerve, myelinated axons, axon diameter, myelin thickness, compound muscle action potential, neurostimulation, long-term implantation, reinnervation
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Nerve Regeneration, Resins, Synthetic, Sciatic Nerve, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Muscle, Skeletal, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review