The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Synthesis, characterization, and cytocompatibility of elastomeric, biodegradable poly(ester‐urethane)ureas based on poly(caprolactone) and putrescine
Abstract
The engineering of tissue for mechanically demanding applications in the cardiovascular system is likely to require mechanical conditioning of cell–scaffold constructs prior to their implantation. Scaffold properties amenable to such an application include high elasticity and strength coupled with controllable biodegradative and cell‐adhesive properties. To fulfill such design criteria, we have synthesized a family of poly(ester‐urethane)ureas (PEUUs) from polycaprolactone and 1,4‐diisocyanatobutane. Lysine ethyl ester (Lys) or putrescine was used as chain extenders. To encourage cell adhesion, PEUUs were surface modified with radio‐frequency glow discharge followed by coupling of Arg‐Gly‐Asp‐Ser (RGDS). The synthesized PEUUs were highly flexible, with breaking strains of 660–895% and tensile strengths from 9.2–29 MPa. Incubation in aqueous buffer for 8 weeks resulted in mass loss, from >50% (Lys chain extender) to 10% (putrescine chain extender). Human endothelial cells cultured for 4 days with medium containing the degradation products from PEUUs with either the Lys or putrescine chain extender showed no toxic effects. Cell adhesion was 85% of that measured on tissue‐culture polystyrene for unmodified PEUU surfaces (p < 0.01) and >160% (p < 0.001) of polystyrene on RGDS‐modified PEUUs. These biodegradable PEUUs demonstrate potential for future application as cell scaffolds in cardiovascular tissue‐engineering or other soft‐tissue applications. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 61: 493–503, 2002
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Skarja, G. A., & Woodhouse, K. A. (1998) · Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition · doi:10.1163/156856298x00659 · Cited by 173
Cited by
Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering
Ma, P. X. (2008) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.041 · Cited by 1,310
Scaffolds for tissue fabrication
Ma, P. X. (2004) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/s1369-7021(04)00233-0 · Cited by 1,077
Degradation and stabilization of polyurethane elastomers
Xie, F., Zhang, T., Bryant, P., Kurusingal, V., Colwell, J. M., & Laycock, B. (2019) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.12.003 · Cited by 722
Santerre, J. P., Woodhouse, K., Laroche, G., & Labow, R. S. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.079 · Cited by 718
Elastomeric biomaterials for tissue engineering
Chen, Q., Liang, S., & Thouas, G. A. (2013) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.05.003 · Cited by 564
Metadata
- Authors
- Guan, J., Sacks, M. S., Beckman, E. J., & Wagner, W. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-05-17
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 493-503
- ISSN
- 0021-9304 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4636
- OpenAlex
- W1992064090
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synthesis, characterization, and cytocompatibility of elastomeric, biodegradable poly(ester‐urethane)ureas based on poly(caprolactone) and putrescine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.10204
- The paper
- Guan, J., Sacks, M. S., Beckman, E. J., & Wagner, W. R. (2002). Synthesis, characterization, and cytocompatibility of elastomeric, biodegradable poly(ester‐urethane)ureas based on poly(caprolactone) and putrescine. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.